Treatment outcomes of partial nephrectomy for T1b tumours

Current Opinion in Urology

Volumn 23, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 403-410

  Volpe, Alessandro ^a,c   Amparore, Daniele ^b,c   Mottrie, Alexandre ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EASTERN PIEDMONT   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TURIN   (Italy)

^c OLV HOSPITAL   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Nephron sparing surgery; Outcomes; Partial nephrectomy; Renal cell carcinoma; T1b

Indexed keywords

CANCER SURVIVAL; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; ISCHEMIA; KIDNEY FUNCTION; KIDNEY TUMOR; LENGTH OF STAY; LOCAL RECURRENCE FREE SURVIVAL; METASTASIS FREE SURVIVAL; NEPHRECTOMY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; ROBOTICS; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TUMOR VOLUME;

EID: 84881624686     PISSN: 09630643     EISSN: 14736586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e328363a5c0     Document Type: Review

References (61)

1. Ljungberg B, Bensalah K, Bex A, et al. Guidelines on Renal Cell Carcinoma 2013. Renal Cell Carcinoma: Update March 2013. European Association of Urology. Milan 2013
2. Campbell SC, Novick AC, Belldegrun A, et al. Guideline for management of the clinical T1 renal mass. J Urol 2009; 182:1271-1279
3. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. Kidney cancer. Version 2-2012
4. Becker F, Siemer S, Humke U, et al. Elective nephron sparing surgery should become standard treatment for small unilateral renal cell carcinoma: Long-Term survival data of 216 patients. Eur Urol 2006; 49:308-313
5. Patard JJ, Shvarts O, Lam JS, et al. Safety and efficacy of partial nephrectomy for all T1 tumors based on an international multicenter experience. J Urol 2004; 171:2181-2185
6. Matin SF, Gill IS, Worley S, Novick AC. Outcome of laparoscopic radical and open partial nephrectomy for the sporadic 4 cm or less renal tumor with a normal contralateral kidney. J Urol 2002; 168:1356-1359
7. Van Poppel H, Da Pozzo L, Albrecht W, et al. A prospective, randomised EORTC intergroup phase 3 study comparing the oncologic outcome of elective nephron-sparing surgery and radical nephrectomy for low-stage renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol 2011; 59:543-552
8. Crepel M, Jeldres C, Sun M, et al. A population-based comparison of cancercontrol rates between radical and partial nephrectomy for T1A renal cell carcinoma. Urology 2010; 76:883-888
9. Huang WC, Levey AS, Serio AM, et al. Chronic kidney disease after nephrectomy in patients with renal cortical tumours: A retrospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol 2006; 7:735-740
10. Go AS, Chertow GM, Fan D, et al. Chronic kidney disease and the risks of death, cardiovascular events, and hospitalization. N Engl J Med 2004; 351:1296-1305
11. Thompson RH, Boorjian SA, Lohse CM, et al. Radical nephrectomy for pT1a renal masses may be associated with decreased overall survival compared with partial nephrectomy. J Urol 2008; 179:468-471
12. Huang WC, Elkin EB, Levey AS, et al. Partial nephrectomy versus radical nephrectomy in patients with small renal tumors-is there a difference in mortality and cardiovascular outcomes? J Urol 2009; 181:55-61
13. Hollenbeck BK, Taub DA, Miller DC, et al. National utilization trends of partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: A case of underutilizatioñ Urology 2006; 67:254-259
14. Dulabon LM, Lowrance WT, Russo P, Huang WC. Trends in renal tumor surgery delivery within the United States. Cancer 2010; 116:2316-2321
15. Breau RH, Crispen PL, Jenkins SM, et al. Treatment of patients with small renal masses: A survey of the American Urological Association. J Urol 2011; 185:407-413
16. Greene FL, Gospodarowicz M, Wittekend C, et al. American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Staging Manual. 7th ed Philadelphia: Springer; 2009
17. Ficarra V, Novara G, Secco S, et al. Preoperative Aspects and Dimensions Used for an Anatomical (PADUA) classification of renal tumours in patients who are candidates for nephron-sparing surgery. Eur Urol 2009; 56:786-793
18. Kutikov A, Uzzo RG. The R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score: A comprehensive standardized system for quantitating renal tumor size, location and depth. J Urol 2009; 182:844-853
19. Sprenkle PC, Power N, Ghoneim T, et al. Comparison of open and minimally invasive partial nephrectomy for renal tumors 4-7 centimeters. Eur Urol 2012; 61:593-599
20. Peycelon M, Hupertan V, Comperat E, et al. Long-Term outcomes after nephron sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma larger than 4 cm. J Urol 2009; 181:35-41
21. Joniau S, Vander Eeckt K, Srirangam SJ, Van Poppel H. Outcome of nephronsparing surgery for T1b renal cell carcinoma. BJU Int 2009; 103:1344-1348
22. Patard JJ, Pantuck AJ, Crepel M, et al. Morbidity and clinical outcome of nephron-sparing surgery in relation to tumour size and indication. Eur Urol 2007; 52:148-154
23. Becker F, Siemer S, Hack M, et al. Excellent long-Term cancer control with elective nephron-sparing surgery for selected renal cell carcinomas measuring more than 4 cm. Eur Urol 2006; 49:1058-1063
24. Carini M, Minervini A, Lapini A, et al. Simple enucleation for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma between 4 and 7 cm in greatest dimension: Progression and long-Term survival. J Urol 2006; 175:2022-2026
25. Permpongkosol S, Bagga HS, Romero FR, et al. Laparoscopic versus open partial nephrectomy for the treatment of pathological T1N0M0 renal cell carcinoma: A 5-year survival rate. J Urol 2006; 176:1984-1988
26. Roos FC, Brenner W, Thomas C, et al. Functional analysis of elective nephronsparing surgery vs. radical nephrectomy for renal tumors larger than 4 cm. Urology 2012; 79:607-613
27. Piper C, Pfister D, Porres D, et al. Organ-preserving renal tumor surgery for renal cell carcinoma T1b: Operative technique, complications and oncological control. Urologe A 2012; 51:539-543
28. Antonelli A, Ficarra V, Bertini R, et al. Elective partial nephrectomy is equivalent to radical nephrectomy in patients with clinical T1 renal cell carcinoma: Results of a retrospective, comparative, multiinstitutional study. BJU Int 2012; 109:1013-1018
29. Roos FC, Brenner W, Muller M, et al. Oncologic long-Termoutcome of elective nephron-sparing surgery versus radical nephrectomy in patients with renal cell carcinoma stage pT1b or greater in a matched-pair cohort. Urology 2011; 77:803-808
30. Kim JM, Song PH, Kim HT, Park TC. Comparison of partial and radical nephrectomy for pT1b renal cell carcinoma. Korean J Urol 2010; 51:596-600
31. Weight CJ, Larson BT, Fergany AF, et al. Nephrectomy induced chronic renal insufficiency is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular death and death from any cause in patients with localized cT1b renal masses. J Urol 2010; 183:1317-1323
32. Thompson RH, Siddiqui S, Lohse CM, et al. Partial versus radical nephrectomy for 4 to 7 cm renal cortical tumors. J Urol 2009; 182:2601-2606
33. Pahernik S, Roos F, Rohrig B, et al. Elective nephron sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma larger than 4 cm. J Urol 2008; 179:71-74
34. Mitchell RE, Gilbert SM, Murphy AM, et al. Partial nephrectomy and radical nephrectomy offer similar cancer outcomes in renal cortical tumors 4cm or larger. Urology 2006; 67:260-264
35. Leibovich BC, Blute M, Cheville JC, et al. Nephron sparing surgery for appropriately selected renal cell carcinoma between 4 and 7 cm results in outcome similar to radical nephrectomy. J Urol 2004; 171:1066-1070
36. Dash A, Vickers AJ, Schachter LR, et al. Comparison of outcomes in elective partial vs. radical nephrectomy for clear cell renal cell carcinoma of 4-7 cm. BJU Int 2006; 97:939-945
37. Nemr E, Azar G, Fakih F, et al. Partial nephrectomy for renal cancers larger than 4 cm. Prog Urol 2007; 17:810-814
38. Crepel M, Jeldres C, Perrotte P, et al. Nephron-sparing surgery is equally effective to radical nephrectomy for T1BN0M0 renal cell carcinoma: A population-based assessment. Urology 2010; 75:271-275
39. Badalato GM, Kates M, Wisnivesky JP, et al. Survival after partial and radical nephrectomy for the treatment of stage T1bN0M0 renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in the USA: A propensity scoring approach. BJU Int 2012; 109:1457-1462
40. Crispen PL, Boorjian SA, Lohse CM, et al. Outcomes following partial nephrectomy by tumor size. J Urol 2008; 180:1912-1917
41. Bouliere F, Crepel M, Bigot P, et al. Nephron-sparing surgery is superior to radical nephrectomy in preserving renal function outcome in tumors larger than 4 cm. Prog Urol 2011; 21:842-850
42. Gill IS, Kavoussi LR, Lane BR, et al. Comparison of 1800 laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomies for single renal tumors. J Urol 2007; 178: 41-46
43. Tsivian A, Tsivian M, Stanevsky Y, et al. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: Beyond the straightforward T1a. BJU Int 2012; 110:738-742
44. Rais-Bahrami S, Romero FR, Lima GC, et al. Elective laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in patients with tumors >4 cm. Urology 2008; 72: 580-583
45. Simmons MN, Chung BI, Gill IS. Perioperative efficacy of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for tumors larger than 4 cm. Eur Urol 2009; 55:199-207
46. Nouralizadeh A, Simforoosh N, Tabibi A, et al. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for tumours >4cm compared with smaller tumours: Perioperative results. Int Urol Nephrol 2011; 43:371-376
47. Lifshitz DA, Shikanov SA, Deklaj T, et al. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for tumors larger than 4 cm: A comparative study. J Endourol 2010; 24:49-55
48. Porpiglia F, Fiori C, Piechaud T, et al. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for large renal masses: Results of a European survey. World J Urol 2010; 28:525-529
49. Eng MK, Bernstein AJ, Katz MH, et al. Impact of renal lesion size on perioperative and pathologic outcomes in patients undergoing laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. J Endourol 2009; 23:439-443
50. Porpiglia F, Fiori C, Bertolo R, Scarpa RM. Does tumour size really affect the safety of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy? BJU Int 2011; 108:268-273
51. Deklaj T, Lifshitz DA, Shikanov SA, et al. Laparoscopic radical versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for clinical T1bN0M0 renal tumors: Comparison of perioperative, pathological, and functional outcomes. J Endourol 2010; 24:1603-1607
52. Simmons MN, Weight CJ, Gill IS. Laparoscopic radical versus partial nephrectomy for tumors >4 cm: Intermediate-Term oncologic and functional outcomes. Urology 2009; 73:1077-1082
53. Breda A, Stepanian SV, Liao J, et al. Positive margins in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in 855 cases: A multiinstitutional survey from the United States and Europe. J Urol 2007; 178:47-50
54. Papalia R, Simone G, Ferriero M, et al. Laparoscopic and robotic partial nephrectomy without renal ischaemia for tumours larger than 4 cm: Perioperative and functional outcomes. World J Urol 2012; 30:671-676
55. Aboumarzouk OM, Stein RJ, Eyraud R, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: A systematic review and meta-Analysis. Eur Urol 2012; 62:1023-1033
56. Ficarra V, Bhayani S, Porter J, et al. Robot-Assisted partial nephrectomy for renal tumors larger than 4cm: Results of a multicenter, international series. World J Urol 2012; 30:665-670
57. Tiu A, Kim KH, Shin TY, et al. Feasibility of robotic laparoendoscopic singlesite partial nephrectomy for renal tumors >4 cm. Eur Urol 2013; 63:941-946
58. Petros F, Sukumar S, Haber GP, et al. Multiinstitutional analysis of robotassisted partial nephrectomy for renal tumors >4 cm versus<4cm in 445 consecutive patients. J Endourol 2012; 26:642-646
59. Gupta GN, Boris R, Chung P, et al. Robot-Assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for tumors greater than 4cm and high nephrometry score: Feasibility, renal functional, and oncological outcomes with minimum 1 year follow-up. Urol Oncol 2013; 31:51-56
60. Patel MN, Krane LS, Bhandari A, et al. Robotic partial nephrectomy for renal tumors larger than 4 cm. Eur Urol 2010; 57:310-316
61. Long JA, Yakoubi R, Lee B, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for complex tumors: Comparison of perioperative outcomes. Eur Urol 2012; 61:1257-1262