Development of a Vector-Based Method for Coastal Bluffline Mapping Using LiDAR Data and a Comparison Study in the Area of Lake Erie

Marine Geodesy

Volumn 36, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 285-302

  Choung, Yunjae ^a   Li, Rongxing ^a   Jo, Myung Hee ^b  

^a The Ohio State University   (United States)

^b Kyungpook National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

bluff toe; bluff top; bluffline; Delaunay triangulation; DEM (Digital Elevation Model); LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging); normal vector

Indexed keywords

COAST; DIGITAL ELEVATION MODEL; LIDAR; MAPPING; NUMERICAL METHOD; TRIANGULATION;

GREAT LAKES [NORTH AMERICA]; LAKE ERIE;

EID: 84881623193     PISSN: 01490419     EISSN: 1521060X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01490419.2013.813878     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Arias-Castro, E. and Donoho, D. L. 2009. Does median filtering truly preserve edges better than linear filtering?. The Annals of Statistics, 37 (3): 1172 - 1206.
2. Briese, C. Three-dimensional modelling of breaklines from airborne laser scanner data. Proceedings of the 10th ISPRS Congress, pp. 12 - 23. Istanbul, Turkey July
3. Brock, J. C., Wright, C. W., Sallenger, A. H., Krabill, W. B. and Swift, R. N. 2002. Basis and methods of NASA airborne topographic mapper LiDAR surveys for coastal studies. Journal of Coastal Research, 18 (1): 1 - 13.
4. Brügelmann, R. 2000. Automatic breakline detection from airborne laser range data. International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 33 (B3): 109 - 115.
5. California Coastal Commission. 2013. Procedural Guidance Document: Monitoring Attachments and Glossary. http://www.coastal.ca.gov/pgd/pgd-mon2.html. Last accessed 29 April 2013
6. Di, K., Wang, J., Ma, R. and Li, R. Automatic shoreline extraction from high-resolution IKONOS satellite imagery. Proceedings of the ASPRS 2003 Annual Conference, pp. 5 - 9. Anchorage, AK May
7. Harris, M., Brock, J., Nayegandhi, A. and Duffy, M. 2005. Extracting shorelines from NASA airborne topographic LiDAR-derived digital elevation models. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2005-1427. http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2005/1427/. Last accessed 29 April 2013
8. Hubeli, A. and Gross, M. Multi-resolution feature extraction for unstructured meshes. Proceedings of the 12th annual IEEE Visualization Conference, pp. 21 - 26. October, San Diego, CA
9. Lee, I. C., Wu, B. and Li, R. Shoreline extraction from the integration of LiDAR point cloud data and aerial orthophotos using mean shift segmentation. Proceedings of the ASPRS 2009 Annual Conference, pp. 9 - 13. Baltimore, MD March
10. Li, R., Liu, J. and Felus, Y. 2001. Spatial modeling and analysis for shoreline change detection and coastal erosion monitoring. Marine Geodesy, 24 (1): 1 - 12.
11. Li, R., Ma, R. and Di, K. 2002. Digital tide-coordinated shoreline. Marine Geodesy, 25 (1): 27 - 36.
12. Liu, J.-K. 1998. Developing geographic information system applications in analysis of responses to Lake Erie shoreline changes The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH Master's thesis
13. Liu, J.-K., Li, R., Deshpande, S., Niu, X. and Shih, T.-Y. 2009. Estimation of blufflines using topographic LiDAR data and orthoimages. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 75 (1): 69 - 79.
14. Ma, R. 2004. Building model reconstruction from LiDAR data and aerial photographs The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH Doctoral dissertation
15. Maine Geological Survey. 2013. Coastal bluff maps. http://www.maine.gov/doc/nrimc/mgs/mapuse/series/descrip-bluff.htm. Last accessed 29 April 2013
16. Mayer, L. A., Barbor, R. K., Boudreau, P., Chance, T., Fletcher, C., Greening, H., Li, R., Mason, C., Metcalf, K., Snow-Cotter, S. and Wright, D. 2004. A geospatial framework for the coastal zone national needs for coastal mapping and charting, final report, Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
17. National Geodetic Survey. 2013. Remote sensing division coastal mapping program. http://www.ngs.noaa.gov/RSD/coastal/. Last accessed 29 April 2013
18. Parrish, C. E., White, S. A., Calder, B. R., Pe'eri, S. and Rzhanov, Y. 2010. " New approaches for evaluating LiDAR-derived shoreline ". In Imaging and Applied Optics Congress 6 - 8. Tucson, AZ June
19. Quadros, N. D., Collier, P. A. and Fraser, C. S. Integration of bathymetric and topographic LiDAR: A preliminary investigation. Proceedings of ISPRS Congress, pp. 3 - 11. Beijing, China July
20. Saade, E. 2011. " Realities and challenges of airborne operations along the coastal zone ". In Coastal Geotools 2011 21 - 24. Myrtle Beach, SC March
21. Schenk, T. 1999. Digital photogrammetry, Vol. I, Laurelville, OH: Terra Science.
22. Shalowitz, A. L. 1964. Shore and sea boundaries, Silver Spring, MD: U.S. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Ocean Service
23. Srivastava, A. 2005. A least-squares approach to improved shoreline modeling The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH Master's thesis
24. Srivastava, A., Niu, X., Di, K. and Li, R. Shoreline modeling and erosion prediction. Proceedings of ASPRS Annual Conference, pp. 7 - 11. Baltimore, MD March
25. Sukcharoenpong, A. 2010. Review of U.S. tide-coordinated shoreline The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH Master's thesis
26. Washington State Department of Ecology. 2013. Managing drainage on coastal bluffs. http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/sea/pubs/95-107/glossary.html. Last accessed 29 April 2013
27. Wozencraft, J. M. and Millar, D. 2005. Airborne LiDAR and integrated technologies for coastal mapping and charting. Marine Technology Society Journal, 39 (3): 27 - 35.
28. Wolf, P. R. and Dewitt, B. A. 2000. Elements of Photogrammetry with Applications in GIS, 3rd edition, New York: McGraw-Hill.
29. Wright, C. W. and Brock, J. EAARL: A LiDAR for mapping shallow coral reefs and other coastal environments. Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Remote Sensing for Marine and Coastal Environments, pp. 20 - 22. Miami, FL May
30. Zuzek, P. J., Robert, B. N. and Scott, J. T. 2003. Spatial and temporal considerations for calculating shoreline change rates in the Great Lakes basin. Journal of Coastal Research, 38: 125 - 146.