Top management support-almost always necessary and sometimes sufficient for success: Findings from a fuzzy set analysis

International Journal of Project Management

Volumn 31, Issue 7, 2013, Pages 943-957

  Young, Raymond ^a   Poon, Simon ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CANBERRA   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Critical success factor; Fuzzy set analysis; Project failure; Top management support

Indexed keywords

ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PLANNING; FUZZY SETS; PROJECT MANAGEMENT; RESEARCH;

ANALYTICAL APPROACH; CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTOR; CURRENT PRACTICES; PROJECT EXPERIENCES; PROJECT FAILURES; PROJECT MANAGEMENT PRACTICES; SENIOR MANAGEMENT; TOP MANAGEMENT SUPPORT;

MANAGEMENT SCIENCE;

CRITICAL ANALYSIS; EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; FUZZY MATHEMATICS; PROJECT MANAGEMENT;

EID: 84881612501     PISSN: 02637863     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.11.013     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. AICD Company Directors Course 2009, Australian Institute of Company Directors, Sydney.
2. Baccarini D. The logical framework for defining project success. Project Management Journal 1999, 30:25-32.
3. Bassellier G., Pinsonneault A. Assessing top management support for information technologies: an new conceptualisation and measure. European conference on information systems 1998, 1536-1543.
4. Benbasat I., Zmud R.W. Empirical research in information systems: the practice of relevance. MIS Quarterly 1999, 23:3-16.
5. Bertalanaffy L.v General Systems Theory 1968, George Braziller Inc., New York.
6. Brandon D.H. Management Planning for Data Processing 1970, Brandon Systems Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
7. Checkland P. Systems Thinking, Systems Practice 1981, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.
8. Clegg C., Axtell C., Damodaran L., Farbey B., Hull R., Lloyd-Jones R., Nicholls J., Sell R., Tomlinson C. Information technology: a study of performance and the role of human and organizational factors. Ergonomics 1997, 40:851-871.
9. Collins T., Bicknell D. Crash: ten easy ways to avoid a computer disaster 1997, Simon and Schuster, London.
10. Cooke-Davies T. The "real" success factors on projects. International Journal of Project Management 2002, 20:185-190.
11. Crawford L. Senior management perceptions of project management competence. International Journal of Project Management 2005, 23:7-16.
12. de Wit Measurement of project success. International Journal of Project Management 1985, 6:164-170.
13. Dinter H. Criteria for the organizational effectiveness of data processing. Data Management 1971, 9:33-34.
14. Doll W.J. Avenues for top management involvement in successful mis development. MIS Quarterly 1985, 9:17-35.
15. Downs G.W. The rational deterrence debate. World Politics 1989, 41:225-237.
16. Emery J.C. Editors comments-the management difference: a tale of two IS projects. MIS Quarterly 1990, 14:xi-xii.
17. Falconer D.J., Hodgett R.A. The relationship between participation in information systems planning and development and the achievement of performance criteria in Australian commercial organisations that plan strategically for information systems. 10th Australasian Conference on Information Systems, Wellington, New Zealand 1999.
18. Garrity J.T. Top Management and Computer Profits. Harvard Business Review 1963, 41(6-12):172-174.
19. Geortz G., Braumoeller B.F. The methodology of necessary conditions. American Journal of Political Science 2000, 44:14.
20. Goertz G. Assessing the importance of necessary or su±cient conditions in fuzzy-set social science. Compass Working Paper, WP 2003-3 2003.
21. HB280 Standards Australia HB 280 how boards and senior management have governed ICT projects to succeed (or fail) 2006, Standards Australia, Sydney. R. Young (Ed.).
22. Izzo J. A View of Tomorrow's System Architecture, Embattled Fortress 1987, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, (p. chapter 6).
23. Jarvenpaa S.L., Ives B. Executive involvement and participation in the management of information technology. MIS Quarterly 1991, 205-227.
24. Keil M. Pulling the plug: software project management and the problem of project escalation. MIS Quarterly 1995, 19:421.
25. Kohli R., Devaraj S. Realizing the business value of information technology investments: an organisational process. MIS Quarterly Executive 2004, 3:53-68.
26. Kraemer K.L., King J.L. Computing and public organizations. Public Administration Review 1986, 46:488-496.
27. Lederer A.L., Mendelow A.L. Information systems planning: top management takes control. Business Horizons 1988, 73-78. (May-June).
28. Lovallo D., Kahneman D. Delusions of success: how optimism undermines executive's decisions. Harvard Business Review 2003, 81.
29. Lucas H.C. Why Information Systems Fail 1975, Columbia University Press, New York.
30. Lyytinen K., Hirschheim R. Information systems failures-a survey and classification of the empirical literature. Oxford Surveys in Information Technology 1987, 4:257-309.
31. Mähring M. IT Project Governance 2002, The Economic Research Institute, Stockholm School of Economics, Stockholm.
32. Markus L.M. Implementation politics: top management support and user involvement. Systems, Objectives, Solutions 1981, 1:203-215.
33. Markus L.M. Change agentry-the next IS frontier. MIS Quarterly 1996, (Dec):385-407.
34. Markus M.L., Axline S., Petrie D., Tanis C. Learning from adopters' experience with ERP: problems encountered and success achieved. Journal of Information Technology 2000, 15:245-265.
35. McGolpin P., Ward J. Factors Influencing the Success of Strategic Information Systems. Information Systems: an emerging discipline? 1997, 287-327. McGraw-Hill, London. J. Mingers, F. Stowell (Eds.).
36. Peppard J., Ward J., Daniel E. Managing the realization of business benefits from it investments. MIS Quarterly Executive 2007, 6.
37. Poon S., Young R., Irandoost S., Land L. Re-assessing the importance of necessary or sufficient conditions of critical success conditions of critical success factors in IT project success: a fuzzy set theoretic approach, ECIS 2011, Helsinki 2011, (p. Paper 176).
38. Ragin C.C. The comparative method: Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies 1987, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
39. Ragin C.C. Redesigning Social Inquiry: Fuzzy Sets and Beyond 2008, University of Chicago Press.
40. Ragin C., Rihoux B. Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA): State of the Art and Prospects. In: Qualitative Methods. Newsletter of the American Political Science Association Organized Section on Qualitative Methods, 2, 2 2004, 3-13.
41. Rihoux B. Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Systematic Comparative Methods. Recent Advances and Remaining Challenges for Social Science Research. International Sociology 2006, 21(5):679-706.
42. Rocheleau B. Prescriptions for public-sector information management: a review, analysis and critique. American Review of Public Administration 2000, 30:414-435.
43. Rockart J.F., Crescenzi A.D. Engaging top management in information technology. Sloan Management Review 1984, 3-16.
44. Sargeant R. Creating Value in Project Management Using PRINCE2 2010, Queenland Univerisity of Technology, Brisbane.
45. Sauer C. Why Information Systems Fail: a case study approach 1993, Alfred Waller Ltd., Henley on Thames.
46. Sauer C. Deciding the Future for IS Failures Not the Choice You Might Think. Rethinking Management Information Systems 1999, Oxford University Press, New York. B. Galliers, W. Currie (Eds.).
47. Sauer C., Reich B.H. Rethinking IT project management: evidence of a new mindset and its implications. International Journal of Project Management 2009, 27:182-193.
48. Schmidt R., Lyytinen K., Keil M., Cule P. Identifying software project risks: an international Delphi study. Journal of Management Information Systems 2001, 17:5-36.
49. Schmitt J.W., Kozar K.A. Management's role in information system development failures: a case study. MIS Quarterly 1978, (June):7-16.
50. Sharma R., Yetton P. The contingent effects of Management Support and Task Interdependence on successful information systems implementation. MIS Quarterly 2003, 27:533-555.
51. Standish Unfinished voyages: a follow-up to the CHAOS report Available at:, (Last view 11/08/2010). http://www.standishgroup.com/sample_research/unfinished_voyages_1.php.
52. Standish Latest Standish group CHAOS Report Available at:, (Last view 27/10/2010). http://www.standishgroup.com/press/article.php?id=2.
53. Standish The CHAOS Report - Unfinished Voyages 2006, Standish Group International.
54. Standish The CHAOS Report 2009, Standish Group International.
55. Strassmann P.A. The Politics of Information Management 1995, Information Economics Press, New Canaan, CT.
56. Thomas J., Mullaly M. Researching the Value of Project Management 2008, PMI.
57. Thomas J., Dellisle C.L., Jugdev K., Buckle P. Selling project management to senior executives: the case for avoiding crisis sales. Project Management Journal 2002, 33:19-28.
58. Thomsett R. Third Wave Project Management 1989, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
59. Tichy L., Bascom T. The business end of it project failure. Mortgage Banking 2008, 68:28-35.
60. Vaughan D. Theory Elaboration: The Heuristics of Case Analysis. What is a Case?: Exploring the Foundations of Social Inquiry 1992, Cambridge University Press. C. Ragin, H.S. Becker (Eds.).
61. Willcocks L. Information Management: the evaluation of information systems investments 1994, Chapman & Hall, London.
62. Willcocks L., Margetts H. Risk assessment and information systems. European Journal of Information Systems 1994, 3(2):127-138.
63. Yin R.K. Case Study Research: design and methods 2003, Sage, Newbury Park. 3rd ed.
64. Young R. What is the ROI for IT Project Governance? Establishing a benchmark. 2006 IT Governance International Conference, Auckland, New Zealand 2006.
65. Young R., Jordan E. Top management support: mantra or necessity?. International Journal of Project Management 2008, 26:713-725.
66. Zadeh L.A. Fuzzy sets. Information and Control 1965, 338-353.