Scientific working group for forensic toxicology (SWGTOX) standard practices for method validation in forensic toxicology

Journal of Analytical Toxicology

Volumn 37, Issue 7, 2013, Pages 452-474

[No Author Info available]

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BENZODIAZEPINE;

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; CALIBRATION; DOCUMENTATION; FORENSIC TOXICOLOGY; IMMUNOASSAY; IONIZATION; LIMIT OF DETECTION; LIMIT OF QUANTITATION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; VALIDATION PROCESS;

CALIBRATION; FORENSIC TOXICOLOGY; HUMANS; PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS; QUALITY CONTROL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 84881605727     PISSN: 01464760     EISSN: 19452403     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jat/bkt054     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Araujo, P. Key Aspects of Analytical Method Validation and Linearity Evaluation, J Chromatogr B, 877, (2009), 2224-2234.
2. Bressolle, F, Bromet-Petit, M, Audran, M. Validation of Liquid Chromatographic and Gas Chromatographic Methods, Applications to Pharmacokinetics J Chromatogr B, 686,1996),3-10.
3. Bruce, P, Minkkinen, Riekkola M. Practical Method Validation: Validation Sufficient for an Analytical Method, Mikrochim Acta, 128 (1998), 93-106.
4. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, C50-A Mass Spectrometry in the Clinical Laboratory: General Principles and Guidance; Approved Guideline, Vol 27, No 24 (2007).
5. Corley, J, Best Practices in Establishing Detection and Quantification Limits for Pesticides Residues in Foods in Handbook of Residue Analytical Methods for Agrochemicals, JohnWiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester (2003).
6. Drummer, O, Requirements for Bioanalytical Procedures in Postmortem Toxicology, Anal Bioanal Chem, 388 (2007), 1495-1503.
7. Eurachem Guide, The Fitness for Purposes of Analytical Methods, (1998).
8. Health Sciences Authority, Guidance Notes on Analytical Method Validation: Methodology, (Sept. 6, 2004).
9. Hubert, Ph, Nguyen-Huu, J-J, Boulanger, B et al. Harmonization of Strategies for the Validation of Quantitative Analytical Procedures ASFSTP Proposal-Part I, J Pharm Biomed Anal, 36 (2004), 579-586.
10. Hubert, Ph, Nguyen-Huu, J-J, Boulanger, B et al. Harmonization of Strategies for the Validation of Quantitative Analytical Procedures ASFSTP Proposal-Part II, J Pharm Biomed Anal, 45 (2007), 70-81.
11. Hubert, Ph, Nguyen-Huu, J-J, Boulanger, B et al. Harmonization of Strategies for the Validation of Quantitative Analytical Procedures ASFSTP Proposal-Part III, J Pharm Biomed Anal, 45 (2007), 82-96.
12. International Vocabulary of Metrology-Basic and General Concepts and Associated Terms (VIM), ISO/IEC Guide 99:2007, Organization for Standardization (ISO)/International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC), Geneva, 2007.
13. Kushnir, M M, Rockwood, A L, Nelson, G J et al. Assessing Analytical Specificity in Quantitative Analysis Using Tandem Mass Spectrometry, Clin Biochem, 12:003, (2004), 319-327.
14. Liang, H R, Foltz, R L, Meng, M, Bennett, P. Ionization enhancement in atmospheric pressure chemical ionization and suppression in electrospray ionization between target drugs and stable-isotope-labeled internal standards in quantitative liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry, Rapid Comm Mass Spec, 17 (2003), 2815-2821.
15. Matuszewski, B K, Constanzer, M L, Chavez-Eng, C M. Strategies for the Assessment of Matrix Effects in Quantitative Bioanalytical Methods Based on HPLC-MS/MS, Anal Chem, 75: 13, (2003), 3019-3030.
16. Niedbala R S and Gonzalez J M, Immunoassays in Clarke's Analysis of Drugs and Poisons, 4th edition, Moffat, A C, Osselton, M D, Widdop, B, Watts, J Eds. Pharmaceutical Press: London (2011).
17. Peters, F, Maurer, H H. Bioanalytical Method Validation and Its Implications for Forensic and Clinical Toxicology-A Review, Accred Qual Assur, 7, (2002), 441-449.
18. Peters, FT, Method Validation in Applications of LC-MS in Toxicology, Pharmaceutical Press, London (2006).
19. Peters, F, Drummer, O, Musshoff, F. Validation of New Methods, Forensic Sci Int, 165 (2007), 216-224.
20. Remane, D, Meyer, MR, Wissenbach, DK, Mauer, HH. Ion suppression and enhancement effects of co-eluting analytes in multi-analyte approaches: systematic investigation using ultra-high performance liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry with atmospheric pressure chemical ionization or electrospray ionization, Rapid Comm Mass Spec, 24 (2010), 3103-3108.
21. Shah, V, Midha, K, Dighe, S et al. Analytical Methods Validation: Bioavailability, Bioequivalence and Pharmacokinetics Studies, Pharm Res, 9:4, (1992), 588-592.
22. Shah, V, Midha, K, Findlay, J et al. Bioanalytical Method Validation-A Revisit with a Decade of Progress, Pharm Res, 17:12 (2000), 1551-1557.
23. Shultz, E K, Analytical Goals and Clinical Interpretation of Laboratory Procedures in Tietz Textbook of Clinical Chemistry, 2nd edition, Burtis, C A, Ashwood, E R, Eds. W.B. Saunders Company: Pennsylvania (1994).
24. Stockl, D, D'Hondt, H, Thienpont, L M. Method Validation Across the Disciplines-Critical Investigation of Major Validation Criteria and Associated Experimental Protocols, J Chromatogr B, 877, (2009), 2180-2190.
25. Thompson, M, Ellison, S LR, Wood, R. Harmonized Guidelines for Single-Laboratory Validation of Methods of Analysis, IUPAC Technical Report Pure Appl Chem, 74:5, (2002), 835-855.
26. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Guidance for Industry, Bioanalytical Method Validation, (2001).
27. Van Eeckhart, A, Lanckmas, K, Sarre, S et al. Validation of Bioanalytical LC-MS/MS Assays: Evaluation of Matrix Effects, J Chromatogr B, 877, (2009), 2198-2207.
28. Viswanathan, C T, Bansal, S, Booth, B et al. Quantitative Bioanalytical Methods Validation and Implementation: Best Practices for Chromatographic and Ligand Binding Assays, Pharm Res, 24:10, (2007), 1962-1973.
29. Viswanathan, C T, Bansal, S, Booth, B et al. Workshop/Conference Report - Quantitative Bioanalytical Methods Validation and Implementation: Best Practices for Chromatographic and Ligand Binding Assays, AAPS J, 9:1, (2007), E30-E42