Semantically enriched obligation management an approach for improving the handling of obligations represented in contracts

KMIS 2012 - Proceedings of the International Conference on Knowledge Management and Information Sharing

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 40-48

  Thönssen, Barbara ^a,b   Lutz, Jonas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES AND ARTS NORTHWESTERN SWITZERLAND   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMERINO   (Italy)

Author keywords

Contract management; Enterprise architecture; Enterprise ontology; Information extraction; Obligation management; Risk management

Indexed keywords

BACK-GROUND KNOWLEDGE; COMMERCIAL CONTRACTS; CONTRACT MANAGEMENT; ENTERPRISE ARCHITECTURE; ENTERPRISE ONTOLOGY; FORMAL REPRESENTATIONS; PROOF OF CONCEPT; RELEVANT INFORMATIONS;

INDUSTRY; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; RISK MANAGEMENT;

KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT;

EID: 84881578006     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Anon, 2007. Contract Management: Optimizing Revenues and Capturing Savings. Contract Lifecycle Management and the CFO. Available at: http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi-pwwi/is-200705/ai-n19058810/[Accessed April 19, 2012].
2. Arenas, M. et al., 2011. A Direct Mapping of Relational Data to RDF. W3C Working Draft 20 September 2011, (September 2011), pp.1-11.
3. Auer, S. et al., 2010. Use Cases and Requirements for Mapping Relational Databases to RDF. W3C Working Draft 2 June 2010, (June), pp.1-18. Available at: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/use-cases/[Accessed January 26, 2012].
4. Bertolazzi, P. et al., 2001. An Approach to the Definition of a Core Enterprise Ontology : CEO. In International Workshop on Open Enterprise Solutions: Systems, Experiences, and Organizations - OES-SEO 2001. Rome, pp. 104-115.
5. Bizer, C., Heath, T. & Berners-Lee, T., 2009. Linked Data - The Story So Far. International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems (IJSWIS), 5(3), pp.1-22.
6. Dimitrakos, T., Golby, D. & Kearney, P., 2004. Towards a Trust and Contract Management Framework for dynamic Virtual Organisations. In Proceedings of the eChallenges Conference (eChallenges 2004). Vienna, Austria. DoDAF, 2007. DoD Architecture Framework Volume I : Definitions and Guidelines. Architecture, I(April 2007), pp.1-46.
7. Fox, M. S. & Grüninger, M., 1998. Enterprise Modeling. AI Magazine, 19(3), pp.109-121.
8. Fox, M. S. & Grüninger, M., 1997. On Ontologies And Enterprise Modelling. In International Conference on Enterprise Integration Modelling Technology 97. Springer. Available at: http://www.eil.utoronto.ca/enterprise- modelling/papers/fox-eimt97.pdf.
9. Goetz, C. J. & Scott, R. E., 1983. Mitigation Principle: Toward a General Theory of Contractual Obligation. Virginia Law Review, 69(6). Available at: https://litigation-essentials.lexisnexis.com/webcd/app?action= DocumentDisplay&crawlid=1&srctype=smi&srcid=3B15&doctype= cite&docid=69+Va.+L.+Rev.+967&key=2c499ddc896515ef43456ba87a993188.
10. Grosse-Ruyken, P. T. & Wagner, S. M., 2011. APPRIS Project Report, Zürich.
11. Hert, M., Reif, G. & Gall, H. C., 2001. A Comparison of RDB-to-RDF Mapping Languages. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Semantic Systems. Graz, Austria, pp. 25-32. Available at: http://dl.acm.org/ft- gateway.cfm?id=2063522&ftid=1 054499&dwn=1&CFID= 81605256&CFTOKEN=14608054.
12. IACCM, 2007. Contract Management Software. Market Sizing And Status Report, .
13. Leppänen, M., 2005. A Context-Based Enterprise Ontology. In G. Guizzardi & G. Wagner, eds. Proceedings of the EDOC International Workshop on Vocabularies, Ontologies and Rules for the Enterprise (VORTE'05). Enschede, Netherlands: Springer Berlin, pp. 17-24.
14. Sahoo, S.S. et al., 2009. A Survey of Current Approaches for Mapping of Relational Databases to RDF., pp.1- 15.
15. Spanos, D.-E., Stavrou, P. & Mitrou, N., 2011. Bringing relational databases into the Semantic Web: A survey. Semantic Web - Interoperability, Usability, Applicability, 0, pp.1-41. The Open Group, 2009. ArchiMate 1.0 Specification, Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20087110.
16. Thönssen, B. & Wolff, D., 2010. A broader view on Context Models to support Business Process Agility. In S. Smolnik, F. Teuteberg, & O. Thomas, eds. Semantic Technologies for Business and Information Systems Engineering: Concepts and Applications. W3C Working Group, 2011. RDB2RDF Implementations. Available at: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/wiki/ Implementations [Accessed January 25, 2012].
17. Wick, M., GeoNames. Available at: http://www.geonames.org/ [AccessedApril22, 2012].
18. Wilson, E.M., 2007. TrustCoM Project Final Report V1, Available at: ftp://ftp.cordis.europa.eu/pub/ist/docs/st/trustcom-finalreport-en.pdf.
19. Wilson, M., Arenas, A. & Schubert, L., 2006. The TrustCoM Framework for trust, security and contract management of web services and the Grid - V2, Available at: http://www.clrc.ac.uk/Activity/ACTIVITY=Publications;SECTION=225.
20. Yu, L., 2011. Developer's Guide to the Semantic Web online., A. Springer. Available at: http://lib.myilibrary.com?ID=308236 KMIS 2012 - International Conference on Knowledge Management and Information Sharing 48.