The Life and Death of Desegregation Policy in Wake County Public School System and Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools

Education and Urban Society

Volumn 45, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 571-588

  Williams, Sheneka M ^a   Houck, Eric A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

educational policy; educational reform; urban education

Indexed keywords

EID: 84881564279     PISSN: 00131245     EISSN: 15523535     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0013124513486290     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. AdairS.WilliamsS. M. (unpublished). A critical race theory perspective of student assignment policies. Working paper.
2. Anderson J. D.The education of Blacks in the south, 1860-1935. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press; 1988:.
3. Anderson J. E.Public policymaking: An introduction. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt; 2003:.
4. Board of Education v. Superior Court, 61 Cal. App. 4th 411 (1998).
5. Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, 347 U.S. 483 (1954).
6. Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka II, 349 U.S. 294 (1955).
7. Cappachione v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools, 57 Supp. 2d 228 (1999).
8. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools (2006). Equity plus: Providing equity in all schools. Retrieved from http://www.cms.k12.nc.us/allschools/equityPlus/index.asp.
9. Eisenhardt K.,Graebner M.Theory building crom cases: Opportunities and challenges.The Academy of Management Journal ARCHIVE. 2007;50 (1): 25-32.
10. Fife B. L.School desegregation in the twenty-first century: The focus must change. Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Press; 1997:.
11. Goldring E.,Cohen-Vogel L.,Smrekar C.,Taylor C.Schooling closer to home: Desegregation policy and neighborhood context.American Journal of Education. 2006;112:335-362.
12. Goldring E. B.,Smrekar C. Paper presented at the Re-segregation of Southern Schools? A Crucial Moment in the History (and the Future) of Public Schooling in America Conference; 2002Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina; 2002.
13. Greenwald R.,Hedges L. V.,Laine R. D.The effect of school resources on student achievement.Review of Educational Research. 1996;66:361-396.
14. Hanushek E. A.The impact of differential expenditures on school performance.Educational Researcher. 1981;18 (4): 45-62.
15. Hanushek E. A.The economics of schooling: Production and efficiency in public schools.Journal of Economic Literature. 1986;24:1141-1177.
16. HanushekE. A.KainJ. F.RivkinS. G. (1999). Do higher salaries buy better teachers?Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w7082.
17. HanushekE. A.KainJ. F.RivkinS. G. (2004). New evidence about Brown v. Board of Education: The complex effects of school racial composition on achievement. (Unpublished manuscript). Retrieved from http://edpro.stanford.edu/eah/papers/race.PDF.
18. Hanushek E. A.,Kain J. F.,Rivkin S. G.New evidence about Brown v. Board of Education: The complex effects of school racial composition on achievement.Journal of Labor Economics. 2009;27:349-383.
19. Harris D.Lost learning, forgotten promises: A national analysis of school racial segregation, student Achievement, and "controlled choice" plans. Washington, DC: Center for American Progress; 2006:.
20. Hedges L. V.,Laine R. D.,Greenwald R.Does money matter? A metaanalysis of studies of the effects of differential school inputs on student outcomes.Educational Researcher. 1994;23 (3): 5-14.
21. Houck E. A.Integrating schools in a changing society: New policies and legal options for a multiracial generation. Frankenberg E.DeBray E., ed. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press; 2011:243-254.
22. Hoxby C.Peer effects in the classroom: Learning from gender and race variation. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research; 2000:.
23. Keyes v. Denver School District No. I, 902 F. Supp. 1274 (1995).
24. Majone G.Evidence, argument, and persuasion in the policy process. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 1989:.
25. Marshall C.Feminist critical policy analysis: A perspective from primary and secondary schooling. London, UK: Falmer Press; 1997:.
26. Merriam S. B.Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 1998:.
27. Mickelson R. A.,Smith S. S.,Southworth S.From the courtroom to the classroom: The shifting landscape school desegregation. Smrekar C. E.Goldring E. B., ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press; 2009:129-156.
28. Milliken v. Bradley, 418 U.S. 717 (1974).
29. Mills v. Freeman, 942 F.Supp. 1449, 1464 (ND Ga.1996).
30. Orfield G.Schools more separate: Consequences of a decade of resegregation. Cambridge, MA: The Civil Rights Project at Harvard University; 2001:.
31. Orfield G.,Frankenberg E. D.,Lee C.The resurgence of school segregation.Educational Leadership. 2003;60 (4): 16-20.
32. Stake R. E.Multiple case study analysis. New York, NY: The Guilford Press; 2006:.
33. The Century Foundation. (2001). Public school choice and integration. Session at the National Press Club. Retrieved from http://www.tcf.org/Events/02-22-01/transcript.pdf.
34. Walker V. S.Their highest potential: An African American school community in the segregated south. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press; 1996:.
35. Williams S. M.Through the eyes of friends: An investigation of school context and cross-racial friendships in racially mixed schools.Urban Education. 2010;45:480-505.
36. Williams S. M.The future of school integration: Socioeconomic diversity as an education reform strategy. Kahlenberg R. D., ed. New York, NY: The Century Foundation Press; 2012:257-281.