Using a Modified Block Schedule to Create a Positive Learning Environment

Middle School Journal

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 14-20

  Ullrich, Walter J ^a,b   Yeamen, John T ^c  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b ST CLOUD STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Becker Middle School   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84881546739     PISSN: None     EISSN: 23276223     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00940771.1999.11494604     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Canady, R. L., & Rettig, M. D., (1995). Block scheduling: A catalyst for change in high schools. Princeton, NJ: Eye on Education.
2. Carroll, J. M., (1989). The Copernican plan: Restructuring the American high school. Andover, MA: Regional Laboratory for the Educational Improvement of the Northeast and Islands.
3. Cushman, K., (1995). Using time well: Schedules in essential schools. Horace, 12(2), 1–8.
4. Maruyama, G., Freeman, C., Hale, D., Frderickson, J., & Springis-Doss, R., (1994). Anoka-Hennepin School District schedule study, preliminary report. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, Center for Applied Reseach and Educational Improvement.
5. Sadowski, M., (1996). Just like starting over: The promises and piffalls of block scheduling. Harvard Education Letter, 12(6), 1–4.