Importance of a global scale approach to using regional models in the assessment of source-receptor relationships for mercury

Mercury Fate and Transport in the Global Atmosphere: Emissions, Measurements and Models

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 503-517

  Bullock Jr , O Russell ^a   Jaeglé, Lyatt ^b  

^a NOAA EARTH SYSTEM RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84881546717     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-93958-2_16     Document Type: Chapter

References (23)

1. Bullock, O.R., 2000. Modeling assessment of transport and deposition patterns of anthropogenic mercury air emissions in the United States and Canada. Science of the Total Environment 259, 145 - 157.
2. Bullock, O.R., Brehme, K.A., 2002. Atmospheric mercury simulation using the CMAQ model: formulation description and analysis of wet deposition results. Atmospheric Environment 36, 2135 - 2146.
3. Bullock, O. R., 2008b. The effect of lateral boundary values on atmospheric mercury simulations with the CMAQ model. In: Carlos Borrego and Ana Isabel Miranda, editors. Air Pollution Modeling and Its Applications XIX. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, in press.
4. Bullock, O.R., Atkinson, D., Braverman, T., Civerolo, K., Dastoor, A., Davignon, D., Ku, J.-Y., Lohman, K., Myers, T., Park, R., Seigneur, C., Selin, N.E., Sistla, G., Vijayaraghavan, K., 2008a. The North American Mercury Model Intercomparison Study (NAMMIS). Part 1: Study description and model-to-model comparisons. Submitted to Journal of Geophysical Research.
5. Christensen, J.H., 1997. The Danish Eulerian hemispheric model - A three-dimensional air pollution model used for the Arctic. Atmospheric Environment 31, 4169 - 4191.
6. Cohen, M., Artz, R., Draxler, R., Miller, P., Poissant, L., Niemi, D., Ratte, D., Deslauriers, M., Duval, R., Laurin, R., Slotnick, J., Nettesheim, T., McDonald, J., 2004. Modeling the atmospheric transport and deposition of mercury to the Great Lakes. Environmental Research 95, 247 - 265.
7. Dastoor, A.P., Larocque, Y., 2004. Global circulation of atmospheric mercury: A modeling study. Atmospheric Environment 38, 147 - 161.
8. ICF, 2005. User's Guide to the Regional Modeling System for Aerosols and Deposition (REMSAD), Version 8. ICF Consulting/SAI, San Francisco, CA.
9. Ilyin, I., Ryaboshapko, A., Afinogenova, O., Berg, T., Hjellbrekke, A.-G., Lee, D.S., 2002. Lead, cadmium and mercury transboundary pollution in 2000. EMEP/MSC-E Report 5/2002, Meteorological Synthesizing Centre - East, Moscow, Russia, 131 pp. http://www.msceast.org.html.
10. Keeler, G. J., Gratz, L., Al-Wali, K., 2005. Influences on the long-term atmospheric mercury wet deposition at Underhill, Vermont. Ecotoxicology 14, 71 - 83.
11. Murphy, D.M., Hudson, P.K., Thomson, D.S., Sheridan, P.J., Wilson, J.C., 2006. Observations of mercury-containing aerosols. Environmental Science & Technology 40, 3163 - 3167.
12. Pai, P., Karamchandani, P., Seigneur, C., 1997. Simulation of the regional atmospheric transport and fate of mercury using a comprehensive Eulerian model. Atmospheric Environment 31, 2717 - 2732.
13. Petersen, G., Bloxam, R., Wong, S., Munthe, J., Kruger, O., Schmolke, S.R., Kumar, A.V., 2001. A comprehensive Eulerian modelling framework for airborne mercury species: model development and applications in Europe. Atmospheric Environment 35, 3063 - 3074.
14. Ryaboshapko, A., Bullock, O.R., Christensen, J., Cohen, M., Dastoor, A., Ilyin, I., Petersen, G., Syrakov, D., Travnikov, O., Artz, R.S., Davignon, D., Draxler, R.R., Munthe, J., Pacyna, J., 2007. Intercomparison study of atmospheric mercury models: 2. Modelling results vs. long-term observations and comparison of country atmospheric balances. Science of the Total Environment 377, 319 - 333.
15. Schroeder, W.H., Anlauf, K.G., Barrie, L.A., Lu, J.Y., Steffon, A., Schneeberger, D.R., Berg, T., 1998. Arctic springtime depletion of mercury. Nature 394, 331 - 332.
16. Seigneur, C., Karamchandani, P., Lohman, K., Vijayaraghavan, K., Shia, R.-L., 2001. Multiscale modeling of the atmospheric fate and transport of mercury. Journal of Geophysical Research 106 (D21), 27795-27809.
17. Seigneur, C., Vijayaraghavan, K., Lohman, K., Karamchandani, P., Scott, C., 2004. Global source attribution for mercury deposition in the United States, Environmental Science & Technology 38, 555 - 569.
18. Selin, N.E., Jacob, D.J., Park, R.J., Yantosca, R.M., Strode, S., Jaegle, L., Jaffe, D., 2007. Chemical cycling and deposition of atmospheric mercury: Global constraints from observations. Journal of Geophysical Research 112, D02308, doi:10.1029/2006JD007450.
19. Shia, R.L., Seigneur, C., Pai, P., Ko, M., Sze, N.D., 1999. Global simulation of atmospheric mercury concentrations and deposition fluxes. Journal of Geophysical Research 104 (D19), 23747-23760.
20. Syrakov, Dimiter, Prodanova, Maria and Slavov Kiril (2005)Bulgarian Emergency Response System: Description and Ensemble Performance NATO Science Series Series IV: Earth and Environmental Series Advances in Air Pollution Modeling for Environmental Security Proceedings of the NATO Advanced Research Workshop on Advances in Air Pollution Modeling for Environmental Security Borovetz, Bulgaria 8-12 May 2004-10.1007/1-4020- 3351-6-33.
21. US EPA, 1997. Mercury Study Report to Congress. Fate and Transport of Mercury in the Environment, Vol. III. EPA-452/R-97-005, US Environmental Protection Agency, US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
22. US EPA, 2005. Technical Support Document for the Final Clean Air Mercury Rule: Air Quality Modeling, EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, March 2005. ( http://www.epa.gov/ttn/atw/ utility/aqm-oar-2002-0056-6130.pdf ).
23. Vermette, S., Lindberg, S., and Bloom, N., 1995. Field tests for a regional Mercury Deposition Network - Sampling design and preliminary test results. Atmospheric Environment 29, 1247 - 1251.