A large-scale system evaluation on component-level

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 6611 LNCS, Issue , 2011, Pages 679-682

  Kürsten, Jens ^a   Eibl, Maximilian ^a  

^a CHEMNITZ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BUILDING COMPONENTS; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL;

COMPONENT LEVELS; CONFIGURATION PARAMETERS; EMPIRICAL EVALUATIONS; REFERENCE FOR EVALUATION; SYSTEM COMPONENTS; TEXT COLLECTION; TEXT CORPORA;

LARGE SCALE SYSTEMS;

EID: 84881537477     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-20161-5_69     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Cleverdon, C.W.: Report on the testing and analysis of an investigation into the comparative efficiency of indexing systems. Tech. report, Cranfield, USA (1962)
2. Hanbury, A., Müller, H.: Automated Component–Level Evaluation: Present and Future. In: Agosti, M., Ferro, N., Peters, C., de Rijke, M., Smeaton, A. (eds.) CLEF 2010. LNCS, vol. 6360, pp. 124–135. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
3. Ogilvie, P., Callan, J.: Experiments using the Lemur toolkit. TREC 10, 103–108 (2001)
4. Ounis, I., Lioma, C., Macdonald, C., Plachouras, V.: Research directions in terrier: a search engine for advanced retrieval on the Web. Novatica/UPGRADE Special Issue on Next Generation Web Search, 49–56 (2007)
5. Billerbeck, B., Cannane, A., Chattaraj, A., Lester, N., Webber, W., Williams, H.E., Yiannis, J., Zobel, J.: RMIT University at TREC 2004 (2004)
6. Ferro, N., Harman, D.: CLEF 2009: Grid@CLEF pilot track overview. In: Peters, C., Di Nunzio, G.M., Kurimo, M., Mostefa, D., Penas, A., Roda, G. (eds.) CLEF 2009. LNCS, vol. 6241, pp. 552–565. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
7. McNamee, P., Nicholas, C., Mayfield, J.: Addressing morphological variation in alphabetic languages. In: ACM SIGIR 2009, pp. 75–82 (2009)
8. Amati, G.: Frequentist and bayesian approach to information retrieval. In: Lalmas, M., MacFarlane, A., Rüger, S.M., Tombros, A., Tsikrika, T., Yavlinsky, A. (eds.) ECIR 2006. LNCS, vol. 3936, pp. 13–24. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
9. Zhou, Y., Croft, W.B.: Ranking robustness: a novel framework to predict query performance. In: ACM CIKM 2006, pp. 567–574 (2006)
10. Hauff, C., Azzopardi, L., Hiemstra, D.: The combination and evaluation of query performance prediction methods. In: Boughanem, M., Berrut, C., Mothe, J., Soule-Dupuy, C. (eds.) ECIR 2009. LNCS, vol. 5478, pp. 301–312. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
11. Lafferty, J., Zhai, C.: Document language models, query models, and risk minimization for information retrieval. In: ACM SIGIR 2001, pp. 111–119 (2001)
12. Collins-Thompson, K.: Reducing the risk of query expansion via robust constrained optimization. In: ACM CIKM 2009, pp. 837–846 (2009)
13. Kürsten, J., Eibl, M.: Vergleich von IR Systemkonfigurationen auf Komponentenebene. In: Internationales Symposium der Informationswissenschaft 2011 (to appear, 2011)
14. Manning, C.D., Raghavan, P., Schütze, H.: Introduction to information retrieval, p. 160. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2009)