Accuracy of stopcursor method for determining systolic and pulse pressure variation

American Journal of Critical Care

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 298-305

  Tyler, Laurel ^a   Greco, Sheryl ^a   Bridges, Elizabeth ^a,b   Barnes, Sarah ^a   Brown, Laura ^a   Green, Kellie Garth ^a   Wolfson, Diane ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTERIAL PRESSURE; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL VENTILATION; BLOOD PRESSURE; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; METHODOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGIC MONITORING; POSITIVE END EXPIRATORY PRESSURE; PROSPECTIVE STUDY;

ARTERIAL PRESSURE; BLOOD PRESSURE; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMANS; INTENSIVE CARE UNITS; MONITORING, PHYSIOLOGIC; POSITIVE-PRESSURE RESPIRATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RESPIRATION, ARTIFICIAL;

EID: 84881535911     PISSN: 10623264     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4037/ajcc2013295     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Marik PE, Cavallazzi R, Vasu T, et al. Dynamic changes in arterial waveform derived variables and fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: a systematic review of the literature. Crit Care Med. 2009;37(9):2642-2647.
2. Ahrens TS, Schallom L. Comparison of pulmonary artery and central venous pressure waveform measurements via digital and graphic measurement methods. Heart Lung. 2001;30(1):26-38.
3. Lundstedt JL. Comparison of methods of measuring pulmonary artery pressure. Am J Crit Care. 1997;6(4):324-332.
4. Pasion E, Good L, Tizon J, et al. Evaluation of the monitor cursor-line method for measuring pulmonary artery and central venous pressures. Am J Crit Care. 2010;19(6):511-521.
5. Johnson MK, Schumann L. Comparison of three methods of measurement of pulmonary artery catheter readings in critically ill patients. Am J Crit Care. 1995;4(4):300-307.
6. Bridges E, Evers K, Schmelz J, et al. Invasive pressure monitoring at altitude [abstract]. Crit Care Med. 2005;33 (12 suppl):A13.
7. Bridges EJ. Pulmonary artery pressure monitoring: when, how, and what else to use. AACN Adv Crit Care. 2006;17(3):286-303
8. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1(8476):307-310.
9. Bland JM, Altman DG. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res. 1999;8(2):135-160.
10. De Backer D, Heenen S, Piagnerelli M, et al. Pulse pressure variations to predict fluid responsiveness: influence of tidal volume. Intensive Care Med. 2005;31(4):517-523.
11. Pambianco S, Bridges E, Sprow S, et al. Spontaneous variability in functional hemodynamic indices: enhancing interpretation of hemodynamic changes. Am J Crit Care. 2009; 18(3):e1-e2.
12. Wiklund CU, Morel DR, Orbring-Wiklund H, et al. Influence of tidal volume on pulse pressure variations in hypovolemic ventilated pigs with acute respiratory distress-like syndrome. Anesthesiology. 2010;113(3):630-638.
13. Lakhal K, Ehrmann S, Benzekri-Lefevre D, et al. Respiratory pulse pressure variation fails to predict fluid responsiveness in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care. 2011;15(2): R85 (epub).