Understanding adaptive gait in lower-limb amputees: Insights from multivariate analyses

Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  Buckley, John G ^a   De Asha, Alan R ^a   Johnson, Louise ^a   Beggs, Clive B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRADFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Adaptive gait; Locomotion; Lower limb amputee; Multivariate analyses; Obstacle avoidance

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; FEMALE; GAIT; HEIGHT; HUMAN; KNEE FUNCTION; LEG AMPUTATION; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MALE; MULTIPLE REGRESSION; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SPATIOTEMPORAL ANALYSIS; VELOCITY; ADAPTATION; BIOMECHANICS; BODY EQUILIBRIUM; DISABLED PERSON; LEG; LIMB PROSTHESIS; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSIOLOGY;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; AMPUTEES; ARTIFICIAL LIMBS; BIOMECHANICAL PHENOMENA; FEMALE; GAIT; HUMANS; LEG; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; POSTURAL BALANCE;

EID: 84881521077     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17430003     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1743-0003-10-98     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. High failure rates when avoiding obstacles during treadmill walking in patients with a transtibial amputation. Hofstad CJ, van der Linde H, Nienhuis B, Weerdesteyn V, Duysens J, Geurts AC, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006 87 8 1115 1122 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.04.009 16876558
2. The influence of falling, fear of falling, and balance confidence on prosthetic mobility and social activity among individuals with a lower extremity amputation. Miller WC, Deathe AB, Speechley M, Koval J, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001 82 9 1238 1244 10.1053/apmr.2001.25079 11552197
3. Changes to control of adaptive gait in individuals with long-standing reduced stereoacuity. Buckley JG, Panesar GK, MacLellan MJ, Pacey IE, Barrett BT, Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010 51 5 2487 2495 10.1167/iovs.09-3858 20335609
4. The effects of distant and on-line visual information on the control of approach phase and step over an obstacle during locomotion. Mohagheghi AA, Moraes R, Patla AE, Exp Brain Res 2004 155 4 459 468 10.1007/s00221-003-1751-7 14770275
5. Any way you look at it, successful obstacle negotiation needs visually guided on-line foot placement regulation during the approach phase. Patla AE, Greig M, Neurosci Lett 2006 397 1-2 110 114 16413969
6. Visual control of limb trajectory over obstacles during locomotion: effect of obstacle height and width. Patla AE, Rietdyk S, Gait Posture 1993 1 45 60 10.1016/0966-6362(93)90042-Y
7. Visual exteroceptive information provided during obstacle crossing did not modify the lower limb trajectory. Rhea CK, Rietdyk S, Neurosci Lett 2007 418 1 60 65 10.1016/j.neulet.2007.02.063 17382468
8. Control of adaptive locomotion: effect of visual obstruction and visual cues in the environment. Rietdyk S, Rhea CK, Exp Brain Res 2006 169 2 272 278 10.1007/s00221-005-0345-y 16421728
9. Obstacle crossing during locomotion: visual exproprioceptive information is used in an online mode to update foot placement before the obstacle but not swing trajectory over it. Timmis MA, Buckley JG, Gait Posture 2012 36 1 160 162 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.02.008 22424759
10. The SIGAM mobility grades: a new population-specific measure for lower limb amputees. Ryall NH, Eyres SB, Neumann VC, Bhakta BB, Tennant A, Disabil Rehabil 2003 25 15 833 844 10.1080/0963828021000056460 12851094
11. Stepping up to a new level: effects of blurring vision in the elderly. Heasley K, Buckley JG, Scally A, Twigg P, Elliott DB, Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004 45 7 2122 2128 10.1167/iovs.03-1199 15223785
12. A new method for estimating joint parameters from motion data. Schwartz MH, Rozumalski A, J Biomech 2005 38 1 107 116 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.03.009 15519345
13. Attenuation of centre-of-pressure trajectory fluctuations under the prosthetic foot when using an articulating hydraulic ankle attachment compared to fixed attachment. De Asha AR, Johnson L, Munjal R, Kulkarni J, Buckley JG, Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2013 28 2 218 224 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2012.11.013
14. Biomechanical analysis of the influence of prosthetic feet on below-knee amputee walking. Gitter A, Czerniecki JM, DeGroot DM, Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1991 70 3 142 148 10.1097/00002060-199106000-00006 2039616
15. Biomechanics of below-knee amputee gait. Winter DA, Sienko SE, J Biomech 1988 21 5 361 367 10.1016/0021-9290(88)90142-X 3417688
16. Evidence for bilaterally delayed and decreased obstacle avoidance responses while walking with a lower limb prosthesis. Hofstad CJ, Weerdesteyn V, van der Linde H, Nienhuis B, Geurts AC, Duysens J, Clin Neurophysiol 2009 120 5 1009 1015 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.03.003 19362881
17. Falls in patients with lower limb amputations: prevalence and contributing factors. Kulkarni J, Toole C, Hirons R, Wright S, Physiotheraphy 1996 82 2 130 136 10.1016/S0031-9406(05)66968-4
18. Kinematic patterns of participants with a below-knee prosthesis stepping over obstacles of various heights in locomotion. Hill SW, Patla AE, Ishac MG, Adkin AL, Supan TJ, Barth DG, Gait Posture 1997 6 186 192 10.1016/S0966-6362(97) 01120-X
19. Altered kinetic strategy for the control of swing limb elevation over obstacles in unilateral below-knee amputee gait. Hill SW, Patla AE, Ishac MG, Adkin AL, Supan TJ, Barth DG, J Biomech 1999 32 5 545 549 10.1016/S0021-9290(98) 00168-7 10327009
20. Obstacle crossing in lower limb amputees. Vrieling AH, van Keeken HG, Schoppen T, Otten E, Halbertsma JP, Hof AL, Postema K, Gait Posture 2007 26 4 587 594 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2006.12.007 17275306