Medicaid family planning expansions and related preventive care

American Journal of Public Health

Volumn 103, Issue 9, 2013, Pages 1577-1578

  Wherry, Laura R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIORAL RISK FACTOR SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM; BREAST DISEASE; FAMILY PLANNING; FEMALE; HUMAN; MEDICAID; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PREVENTIVE MEDICINE; SERODIAGNOSIS; STATISTICS; UNITED STATES; UTILIZATION REVIEW; VAGINA SMEAR;

ADULT; AIDS SERODIAGNOSIS; BEHAVIORAL RISK FACTOR SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM; BREAST DISEASES; FAMILY PLANNING SERVICES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MEDICAID; PREVENTIVE MEDICINE; UNITED STATES; VAGINAL SMEARS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84881507476     PISSN: 00900036     EISSN: 15410048     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301266     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Institute of Medicine. A Review of the HHS Family Planning Program: Mission, Management, and Measurement of Results. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2009.
2. Wherry LR. The Impact of Medicaid Family Planning Expansions on Preventive Services Utilization. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Institute for Social Research; January 2013. Population Studies Center Research Report no. 13-784.
3. Adams EK, Kenney GM, Galactionova K. Preventive and reproductive health services for women: the role of California's family planning waiver. Am J Health Promot. 2013;27(3, suppl):eS1-eS10.
4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Behavioral risk factor surveillance system operational and user's guide. 2006. Available at: ftp://ftp.cdc.gov/pub/ Data/Brfss/userguide.pdf. Accessed September 19, 2012.
5. US Preventive Services Task Force. Guide to Clinical Preventive Services: Report of the US Preventive Services Task Force. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services; 1989.
6. US Preventive Services Task Force. Guide to Clinical Preventive Services. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services; 1996.
7. US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for Cervical Cancer: Recommendations and Rationale. Washington, DC: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2003.
8. Bertrand M, Duflo E, Mullainathan S. How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates? Q J Econ. 2004;119(1):249-275.
9. Kearney MS, Levine PB. Subsidized contraception, fertility, and sexual behavior. Rev Econ Stat. 2009; 91(1):137-151.
10. Mann C. Family Planning Services Option and New Benefit Rules for Benchmark Plans. Baltimore, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2010.