Influence of various operating conditions on cleaning efficiency in sequencing batch reactor (SBR) activated sludge process. Part III: Chemical cleaning

Desalination

Volumn 325, Issue , 2013, Pages 122-131

  Wang, Zhan ^a   Zhang, Qian ^a   Ma, Yu ^b   Yang, Liying ^c   Lyu, Yawen ^d   Zhao, Shanshan ^e  

^a BEIJING UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^b Climatic Center of Xingjiang Uygur Autonomous Region of China   (China)

^c Aerospace Environmental Engineering Co Ltd   (China)

^d Beijing Rosedale Filter Systems Company   (China)

^e Beijing Xindayu Environmental Protection Engineering Co Ltd   (China)

Author keywords

Chemical cleaning conditions; Impact; Quantitative evaluation; SBR

Indexed keywords

CLEANING EFFICIENCY; DEAD END MICROFILTRATION; IMPACT; POLYETHERSULFONE MEMBRANE; QUANTITATIVE EVALUATION; SBR; SEQUENCING BATCH REACTORS; SODIUM HYPOCHLORITES;

ACTIVATED SLUDGE PROCESS; ALKALINITY; CITRIC ACID; HYDROMETALLURGY; MICROFILTRATION;

CHEMICAL CLEANING;

ACTIVATED SLUDGE; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; CITRIC ACID; CLEANUP; EFFICIENCY MEASUREMENT; MEMBRANE; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; PERMEABILITY; POLYMER; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; ULTRAFILTRATION;

EID: 84881494306     PISSN: 00119164     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2013.06.011     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Yang W., Cicek N., Ilg J. State-of-the-art of membrane bioreactors: worldwide research and commercial applications in North America. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 207:201-211.
2. Fane A.G., Fell C.J.D. A review of fouling and fouling control in ultrafiltration. Desalination 1987, 62:117-136.
3. Visvanathan C., Aim R.B. Application of an electric field for the reduction of particle and colloidal membrane fouling in cross-flow microfiltration. Sep. Sci. Technol. 1989, 24:383-398.
4. Wang P., Tan K.L., Kang E.T., Neoh K.G. Plasma-induced immobilization of poly(ethylene glycol) onto poly(vinylidene fluoride) microporous membrane. J. Membr. Sci. 2002, 195:103.
5. Chiemchaisri C., Wong Y.K., Urase T., Yamamoto K. Organic stabilization and nitrogen removal in membrane separation bioreactor for domestic wastewater treatment. Water Sci. Technol. 1992, 25:231.
6. Van Boxtel A.J.B., Otten Z.E.H. New strategies for economic optimal membrane fouling control based on dynamic optimization. Desalination 1993, 90:363-377.
7. Arkhangelsky Elizabeth, Wicaksana Filicia, Tang Chuyang, Al-Rabiah Abdulrahman A., Al-Zahrani Saeed M., Wang Rong Combined organic-inorganic fouling of forward osmosis hollow fiber membranes. Water Res. 2012, 4(6):6329-6338.
8. Robles A., Ruano M.V., Ribes J., Ferrer J. Factors that affect the permeability of commercial hollow-fibre membranes in a submerged anaerobic MBR (HF-SAnMBR) system. Water Res. 2013, 47:1277-1288.
9. Wang Z., Zhao S., Liu F., Yang L., Song Y., Wang X., Xi X. Influence of operating conditions on cleaning efficiency in sequencing batch reactor (SBR) activated sludge process-water rinsing introduced membrane filtration process. Desalination 2010, 259:235-242.
10. Yang L., Wang Z., Sun Y., Hu Z., Zhao S., Wang X., Li W., Xi X., Zhang J., Pei Z. Influence of various operating conditions on cleaning efficiency in sequencing batch reactor (SBR) activated sludge process. Part II: backwash and water rinsing introduced membrane filtration process. Desalination 2011, 272:76-84.
11. Kuzmenko D., Arkhangelsky E., Belfer S., Freger V., Gitis V. Chemical cleaning of UF membranes fouled by BSA. Desalination 2005, 179:323-333.
12. Porcelli N., Judd S. Chemical cleaning of potable water membranes: a review. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2010, 71:137-143.
13. Norazman N., Wua W., Li H., Wasinger V., Zhang H., Chen V. Evaluation of chemical cleaning of UF membranes fouled with whey protein isolates via analysis of residual protein components on membranes surface. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2013, 103:241-250.
14. Clech P.L., Chen V., Fane A.G. Fouling in membrane bioreactors used in wastewater treatment. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 284:17-53.
15. Bartlett M., Bird M.R., Howell J.A. An experimental study for the development of a qualitative membrane cleaning model. J. Membr. Sci. 1995, 105:147-157.
16. Abdullah S.Z., Berube P.R., Jankhah S. Model development to access the ageing of polymeric membrane due to chemical cleaning. Procedia Eng. 2012, 44:871-873.
17. Lim B.R., Ahn K.H., Song K.G., Jin W.C. Microbial community in biofilm on membrane surface of submerged MBR: Effect of in-line cleaning chemical agent. Water Sci. Technol. 2005, 51(6-7):201-207.
18. Lee H., et al. Cleaning strategies for flux recovery of an ultrafiltration membrane fouled by natural organic matter. Pergamon 2001, 35:3301-3308.
19. Morel G., et al. Surfactant modified ultrafiltration of nitrate ions removal. J. Membr. Sci. 1997, 134:47-57.
20. Ebrahim S. Cleaning and regeneration of membranes in desalination and waste water applications. Desalination 1994, 96:225-238.
21. Väisänen P., Bird M.R., Nyström M. Treatment of UF membranes with simple and formulated cleaning agents. Trans IChemE 2002, 80:98-108.
22. Strugholtz S., Sundaramoorthy K., Panglisch S., Lerch A., BriJgger A., Gimbel R. Evaluation of the performance of different chemicals for cleaning capillary membranes. Desalination 2005, 179:191-202.
23. Chen V., Li H., Li D., Tan S., Petrus H.B. Cleaning strategies for membrane fouled with protein mixtures. Desalination 2006, 200:198-200.
24. Platt S., Nyström M. Cleaning of membranes fouled by proteins to evaluate the importance of fully developed flow. Desalination 2007, 208:19-33.
25. Mohammadi T., Madaeni S.S., Moghadam M.K. Investigation of membrane fouling. Desalination 2003, 155:153-160.
26. Cabero M.L., Riera F.A., Alvarez R. Rinsing of ultrafiltration ceramic membranes fouled with whey proteins: effects on cleaning procedures. J. Membr. Sci. 1999, 154:239.
27. Chen J.P., Kim S.L., Ting Y.P. Optimization of membrane physical and chemical cleaning by a statistically designed approach. J. Membr. Sci. 2003, 219:27.
28. Porcelli N., Judd S. Chemical cleaning of potable water membranes: the cost benefit of optimization. Water Res. 2010, 44:1389-1398.
29. Lee Eui-Jong, Kim Kwan-Yeop, Lee Yong-Soo, Nam Jong-Woo, Lee Young-Soo, Kim Hyung-Soo, Jang Am A study on the high-flux MBR system using PTFE flat sheet membranes with chemical backwashing. Desalination 2012, 306:35-40.
30. Zsirai T., Buzatu P., Aerts P., Judd S. Efficacy of relaxation, backflushing, chemical cleaning and clogging removal for an immersed hollow fibre membrane bioreactor. Water Res. 2012, 46:4499-4507.
31. Hajibabania Shima, Antony Alice, Leslie Greg, Le-Clech Pierre Relative impact of fouling and cleaning on PVDF membrane hydraulic performances. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2012, 90:204-212.
32. Wang S., Wang Z., Zhang Y., Wu W., Liu D., Zhang X. Experimental study on the control of pore sizes of porous membrane by chemical methods. Desalination 2005, 177:7-13.
33. Zhou C., Wang Z., Liang Y., Yao J. Study on the control of pore sizes of membranes using chemical methods. Part II. Optimization factors for preparation of membranes. Desalination 2008, 225:123-138.
34. Wang Z., Chu J., Song Y., Cui Y., Zhang H., Zhao X., Li Z., Yao J. Influence of operating conditions on the efficiency of domestic wastewater treatment in membrane bioreactors. Desalination 2009, 245:73-81.
35. Hwang K.J., Chan C.S. Effect of backwash on the performance of submerged membrane filtration. J. Membr. Sci. 2009, 330:349-356.
36. Cote Pierre, Alam Zamir, Penny Jeff Hollow fiber membrane life in membrane bioreactors (MBR). Desalination 2012, 288:145-15.
37. Ho C.C., Zydney A.L. A combined pore blockage and cake filtration model for protein fouling during microfiltration. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2000, 232:389-399.
38. Ghosh R. Protein Bioseparation Using Ultrafiltration: Theory, Applications and New Developments 2003, Imperial College Press, London.
39. Kazemimoghadam M., Mohammadi T. Chemical cleaning of ultrafiltration membranes in the milk industry. Desalination 2007, 204(1-3 Spec. Iss):213-218.
40. Tragardh G. Membrane cleaning. Desalination 1989, 71(3):325-335.
41. Meng Fangang, Zhang Hanmin, Yang Fenglin, Zhang Shoutong, Zhang Xingwen Identification of activated sludge properties affecting membrane fouling in submerged membrane bioreactors. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2006, 51:95-103.
42. Skorvan O., Holba M., Bodik I., Mikulasek P. Comparison of PES membrane chemical cleaning efficiency using different protocols. Procedia Eng. 2012, 44:1860-1863.
43. Al-Amoudi A., Lovitt R.W. Fouling strategies and the cleaning system of NF membranes and factors affecting cleaning efficiency. J. Membr. Sci. 2007, 303(1-2):4-28.
44. Ang W.S., Elimelech M. Protein (BSA) fouling of reverse osmosis membranes: implications for wastewater reclamation. J. Membr. Sci. 2007, 296(1-2):83-92.
45. Bellona C., Drewes J.E., Xu P., Gary A. Factors affecting the rejection of organic solutes during NF/RO treatment - a literature review. Water Res. 2004, 38(12):2795-2809.
46. Hong S.K., Elimelech M. Chemical, physical aspects of natural organic matter (NOM) fouling of nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 1997, 132(2):159-181.
47. Lujan Facundo M.J., Mendoza Roca J.A., Cuartas Uribe B., Alvarez Blanco S., Bes Pia A. Influence of the operating conditions on the chemical cleaning of ultrafiltration membranes fouled with BSA solution. Procedia Eng. 2012, 44:1940-1942.
48. Porcelli N., Hillis P., Judd S. Microfiltration membrane plant start up: a case study with autopsy and permeability recovery analysis. Environ. Technol. 2009, 30(6):629-639.
49. Li X., Li J., Fu X., Wickramasinghe R., Chen J. Chemical cleaning of PS ultrafilters fouled by the fermentation broth of glutamic acid. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2005, 42(2):181-187.
50. Bohner H.F., Bradley R.L. Effective cleaning and sanitizing of polysulfone ultrafiltration membrane systems. J. Dairy Sci. 1992, 75(3):718-724.