Variation of a test's sensitivity and specificity with disease prevalence

CMAJ. Canadian Medical Association Journal

Volumn 185, Issue 11, 2013, Pages

  Leeflang, Mariska M G ^a   Rutjes, Anne W S ^b,c   Reitsma, Johannes B ^d   Hooft, Lotty ^e   Bossuyt, Patrick M M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CHIETI   (Italy)

^d UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^e Dutch Cochrane Centre   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; PREVALENCE; SENSITIVITY AND SENSIBILITY;

EID: 84881493693     PISSN: 08203946     EISSN: 14882329     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.121286     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Honest H, Khan KS. Reporting of measures of accuracy in systematic reviews of diagnostic literature. BMC Health Serv Res 2002;2:4.
2. Straus SE, Richardson WS, Glasziou P, et al. Diagnosis and screening. In: Evidence-based medicine: how to practice and teach EBM. 3rd ed. Oxford (UK): Elsevier; 2005:89-90.
3. Guyatt G, Sackett DL, Haynes RB. Evaluating diagnostic tests. In: Clinical epidemiology: how to do clinical practice research. Haynes RB, Sackett DL, Guyatt GH, et al. editors. New York (NY): Lippincott William and Wilkins; 2006:294-5.
4. Linden A. Measuring diagnostic and predictive accuracy in disease management: an introduction to receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. J Eval Clin Pract 2006;12:132-9.
5. Scales CD Jr, Dahm P, Sultan S, et al. How to use an article about a diagnostic test. J Urol 2008;180:469-76.
6. Mulherin SA, Miller WC. Spectrum bias or spectrum effect? Subgroup variation in diagnostic test evaluation. Ann Intern Med 2002;137:598-602.
7. Feinstein AR. Misguided efforts and future challenges for research on "diagnostic tests." J Epidemiol Community Health 2002;56:330-2.
8. Szklo M, Nieto J. Quality assurance and control. In: Epidemiology: beyond the basics. Burlington (MA): Jones and Bartlett Learning; 2007:315-7.
9. Brenner H, Gefeller O. Variation of sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios and predictive values with disease prevalence. Stat Med 1997;16:981-91.
10. Leeflang MM, Bossuyt PM, Irwig L. Diagnostic test accuracy may vary with prevalence: implications for evidence-based diagnosis. J Clin Epidemiol 2009;62:5-12.
11. Rutjes AW, Reitsma JB, Di Nisio M, et al. Evidence of bias and variation in diagnostic accuracy studies. CMAJ 2006;174:469-76.
12. Macaskill P, Gatsonis C, Deeks JJ, et al. Analysing and presenting results. In: Deeks JJ, Bossuyt PM, Gatsonis C, editors. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy. Version 1.0. Oxford (UK): The Cochrane Collaboration; 2010. Available: http://srdta .cochrane .org
13. Reitsma JB, Glas AS, Rutjes AW, et al. Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol 2005;58:982-90.
14. Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. 5.1.0 ed. Oxford (UK): The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011. Available: www.cochrane-handbook.org (accessed 2012 Mar. 27).
15. Balk EM, Ioannidis JP, Salem D, et al. Accuracy of biomarkers to diagnose acute cardiac ischemia in the emergency department: a meta-analysis. Ann Emerg Med 2001;37:478-94.
16. Lau J, Ioannidis JP, Balk EM, et al. Diagnosing acute cardiac ischemia in the emergency department: a systematic review of the accuracy and clinical effect of current technologies. Ann Emerg Med 2001;37:453-60.
17. Berger MY, van der Velden JJ, Lijmer JG, et al. Abdominal symptoms: Do they predict gallstones? A systematic review. Scand J Gastroenterol 2000;35:70-6.
18. Devillé WL, van der Windt DA, Dzaferagic A, et al. The test of Lasègue: systematic review of the accuracy in diagnosing herniated discs. Spine 2000;25:1140-7.
19. Fiellin DA, Reid MC, O'Connor PG. Screening for alcohol problems in primary care: a systematic review. Arch Intern Med 2000;160:1977-89.
20. Gould MK, Maclean CC, Kuschner WG, et al. Accuracy of positron emission tomography for diagnosis of pulmonary nodules and mass lesions: a meta-analysis. JAMA 2001;285:914-24.
21. Hobby JL, Tom BD, Bearcroft PW, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the wrist: diagnostic performance statistics. Clin Radiol 2001;56:50-7.
22. Hoffman RM, Clanon DL, Littenberg B, et al. Using the free-tototal prostate-specific antigen ratio to detect prostate cancer in men with nonspecific elevations of prostate-specific antigen levels. J Gen Intern Med 2000;15:739-48.
23. Hoogendam A, Buntinx F, de Vet HC. The diagnostic value of digital rectal examination in primary care screening for prostate cancer: a meta-analysis. Fam Pract 1999;16:621-6.
24. Huicho L, Campos-Sanchez M, Alamo C. Metaanalysis of urine screening tests for determining the risk of urinary tract infection in children. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2002;21:1-11.
25. Hurley JC. Concordance of endotoxemia with gram-negative bacteremia. A meta-analysis using receiver operating characteristic curves. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2000;124:1157-64.
26. Kelly S, Harris KM, Berry E, et al. A systematic review of the staging performance of endoscopic ultrasound in gastrooesophageal carcinoma. Gut 2001;49:534-9.
27. Kim C, Kwok YS, Heagerty P, et al. Pharmacologic stress test-ing for coronary disease diagnosis: a meta-analysis. Am Heart J 2001;142:934-44.
28. Kwok Y, Kim C, Grady D, et al. Meta-analysis of exercise testing to detect coronary artery disease in women. Am J Cardiol 1999;83:660-6.
29. Lederle FA, Simel DL. The rational clinical examination. Does this patient have abdominal aortic aneurysm? JAMA 1999 ;281: 77-82.
30. Mitchell MF, Cantor SB, Brookner C, et al. Screening for squamous intraepithelial lesions with fluorescence spectroscopy. Obstet Gynecol 1999;94:889-96.
31. Mol BW, Lijmer JG, van der Meulen J, et al. Effect of study design on the association between nuchal translucency measurement and Down syndrome. Obstet Gynecol 1999;94:864-9.
32. Nelemans PJ, Leiner T, de Vet HC, et al. Peripheral arterial disease: meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of MR angiography. Radiology 2000;217:105-14.
33. Safriel Y, Zinn H. CT pulmonary angiography in the detection of pulmonary emboli: a meta-analysis of sensitivities and specificities. Clin Imaging 2002;26:101-5.
34. Sloan NL, Winikoff B, Haberland N, et al. Screening and syndromic approaches to identify gonorrhea and chlamydial infection among women. Stud Fam Plann 2000;31:55-68.
35. Sonnad SS, Langlotz CP, Schwartz JS. Accuracy of MR imaging for staging prostate cancer: a meta-analysis to examine the effect of technologic change. Acad Radiol 2001;8:149-57.
36. Vasquez TE, Rimkus DS, Hass MG, et al. Efficacy of morphine sulfate-augmented hepatobiliary imaging in acute cholecystitis. J Nucl Med Technol 2000;28:153-5.
37. Visser K, Hunink MG. Peripheral arterial disease: gadoliniumenhanced MR angiography versus color-guided duplex US-a meta-analysis. Radiology 2000;216:67-77.
38. Wiese W, Patel SR, Patel SC, et al. A meta-analysis of the Papanicolaou smear and wet mount for the diagnosis of vaginal trichomoniasis. Am J Med 2000;108:301-8.
39. Smidt N, Rutjes AW, van der Windt DA, et al. The quality of diagnostic accuracy studies since the STARD statement: Has it improved? Neurology 2006;67:792-7.
40. Ransohoff DF, Feinstein AR. Problems of spectrum and bias in evaluating the efficacy of diagnostic tests. N Engl J Med 1978; 299:926-30.
41. Irwig L, Bossuyt P, Glasziou P, et al. Designing studies to ensure that estimates of test accuracy are transferable. BMJ 2002; 324:669-71.
42. Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, et al. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative: Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy. Ann Intern Med 2003;138:40-4.