A method for reversible drug delivery to internal tissues of Drosophila embryos

Fly

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 193-203

  Schulman, Victoria K ^a,b   Folker, Eric S ^a   Baylies, Mary K ^a,b  

^a MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER   (United States)

^b Weill Cornell Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences   (United States)

Author keywords

Chorion; Drosophila; Drug delivery; Embryo; Permeabilization

Indexed keywords

DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER;

CYCLOHEXENE DERIVATIVE; HEPTANE; LIMONENE; NOCODAZOLE; TERPENE;

ANIMAL; ANIMAL EMBRYO; ARTICLE; CHORION; DROSOPHILA; DRUG COMBINATION; DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM; DRUG EFFECT; EMBRYO; METHODOLOGY; MUSCLE; PERMEABILITY; PERMEABILIZATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PRENATAL DEVELOPMENT;

CHORION; DROSOPHILA; DRUG DELIVERY; EMBRYO; PERMEABILIZATION;

ANIMALS; CYCLOHEXENES; DROSOPHILA; DRUG COMBINATIONS; DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS; EMBRYO, NONMAMMALIAN; HEPTANES; MUSCLES; NOCODAZOLE; PERMEABILITY; TERPENES;

EID: 84881488586     PISSN: 19336934     EISSN: 19336942     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4161/fly.25438     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Brand AH, Perrimon N. Targeted gene expression as a means of altering cell fates and generating dominant phenotypes. Development 1993; 118:401-15; PMID:8223268
2. Ni JQ, Markstein M, Binari R, Pfeiffer B, Liu LP, Villalta C, et al. Vector and parameters for targeted transgenic RNA interference in Drosophila melanogaster. Nat Methods 2008; 5:49-51; PMID:18084299; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmeth1146
3. Dietzl G, Chen D, Schnorrer F, Su KC, Barinova Y, Fellner M, et al. A genome-wide transgenic RNAi library for conditional gene inactivation in Drosophila. Nature 2007; 448:151-6; PMID:17625558; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature05954
4. De Brabander M, Geuens G, De Mey J, Joniau M. Nucleated assembly of mitotic microtubules in living PTK2 cells after release from nocodazole treatment. Cell Motil 1981; 1:469-83; PMID:7348606; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cm.970010407
5. Ezratty EJ, Partridge MA, Gundersen GG. Microtubule-induced focal adhesion disassembly is mediated by dynamin and focal adhesion kinase. Nat Cell Biol 2005; 7:581-90; PMID:15895076; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb1262
6. Margaritis LH, Kafatos FC, Petri WH. The eggshell of Drosophila melanogaster. I. Fine structure of the layers and regions of the wild-type eggshell. J Cell Sci 1980; 43:1-35; PMID:6774986
7. Brust-Mascher I, Scholey JM. Microinjection techniques for studying mitosis in the Drosophila melanogaster syncytial embryo. J Vis Exp 2009; PMID:19755959; http://dx.doi.org/10.3791/1382
8. Zappe S, Fish M, Scott MP, Solgaard O. Automated MEMS-based Drosophila embryo injection system for high-throughput RNAi screens. Lab Chip 2006; 6:1012-9; PMID:16874371; http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/b600238b
9. Lecuit T, Wieschaus E. Junctions as organizing centers in epithelial cells? A fly perspective. Traffic 2002; 3:92-7; PMID:11929599; http://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0854.2002.030202.x
10. Arking R, Parente A. Effects of RNA inhibitors on the development of Drosophila embryos permeabilized by a new technique. J Exp Zool 1980; 212:183-94; PMID:6156991; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jez.1402120205
11. Lynch DV, Lin TT, Myers SP, Leibo SP, Macintyre RJ, Pitt RE, et al. A two-step method for permeabilization of Drosophila eggs. Cryobiology 1989; 26:445-52; PMID:2507226; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0011-2240(89)90069-2
12. Mazur P, Cole KW, Mahowald AP. Critical factors affecting the permeabilization of Drosophila embryos by alkanes. Cryobiology 1992; 29:210-39; PMID:1582229; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0011-2240(92)90021-S
13. Strecker TR, McGhee S, Shih S, Ham D. Permeabilization, staining and culture of living Drosophila embryos. Biotech Histochem 1994; 69:25-30; PMID:7511938; http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/10520299409106257
14. Rand MD, Kearney AL, Dao J, Clason T. Permeabilization of Drosophila embryos for introduction of small molecules. Insect Biochem Mol Biol 2010; 40:792-804; PMID:20727969; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ibmb.2010.07.007
15. Petri WH, Wyman AR, Kafatos FC. Specific protein synthesis in cellular differentiation. III. The eggshell proteins of Drosophila melanogaster and their program of synthesis. Dev Biol 1976; 49:185-99; PMID:815116; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0012-1606(76)90266-9
16. Margaritis LH. The egg-shell of Drosophila melanogaster III. Covalent crosslinking of the chorion proteins involves endogenous hydrogen peroxide. Tissue Cell 1985; 17:553-9; PMID:18620142; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0040-8166(85)90031-X
17. Cernilogar FM, Fabbri F, Andrenacci D, Taddei C, Gargiulo G. Drosophila vitelline membrane cross-linking requires the fs(1)Nasrat, fs(1)polehole and chorion genes activities. Dev Genes Evol 2001; 211:573-80; PMID:11819114; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00427-001-0192-1
18. Limbourg B, Zalokar M. Permeabilization of Drosophila eggs. Dev Biol 1973; 35:382-7; PMID:4207363; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0012-1606(73)90034-1
19. Folker ES, Schulman VK, Baylies MK. Muscle length and myonuclear position are independently regulated by distinct Dynein pathways. Development 2012; 139:3827-37; PMID:22951643; http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/dev.079178
20. Morrison EE, Wardleworth BN, Askham JM, Markham AF, Meredith DM. EB1, a protein which interacts with the APC tumour suppressor, is associated with the microtubule cytoskeleton throughout the cell cycle. Oncogene 1998; 17:3471-7; PMID:10030671; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1202247
21. Baylies MK, Bate M. Twist: a myogenic switch in Drosophila. Science 1996; 272:1481-4; PMID:8633240; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science. 272.5267.1481
22. Rogers GC, Rusan NM, Peifer M, Rogers SL. A multicomponent assembly pathway contributes to the formation of acentrosomal microtubule arrays in interphase Drosophila cells. Mol Biol Cell 2008; 19:3163-78; PMID:18463166; http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E07-10-1069
23. Tilney LG, Gibbins JR. Microtubules in the formation and development of the primary mesenchyme in Arbacia punctulata. II. An experimental analysis of their role in development and maintenance of cell shape. J Cell Biol 1969; 41:227-50; PMID:5775787; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.41.1.227
24. Handel MA, Roth LE. Cell shape and morphology of the neural tube: implications for microtubule function. Dev Biol 1971; 25:78-95; PMID:5557970; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0012-1606(71)90020-0
25. Brown DL, Bouck GB. Microtubule biogenesis and cell shape in Ochromonas. II. The role of nucleating sites in shape development. J Cell Biol 1973; 56:360-78; PMID:4682901; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.56.2.360
26. Downie JR. The role of microtubules in chick blastoderm expansion--a quantitative study using colchicine. J Embryol Exp Morphol 1975; 34:265-77; PMID:1237532
27. Gipson IK. Cytoplasmic filaments: their role in motility and cell shape. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1977; 16:1081-4; PMID:411764
28. Matthews KA, Kaufman TC. Developmental consequences of mutations in the 84B alpha-tubulin gene of Drosophila melanogaster. Dev Biol 1987; 119:100-14; PMID:3098600; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0012-1606(87)90211-9
29. Mikhailov A, Gundersen GG. Relationship between microtubule dynamics and lamellipodium formation revealed by direct imaging of microtubules in cells treated with nocodazole or taxol. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton 1998; 41:325-40; PMID:9858157; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0169(1998)41:4<325::AID-CM5>3.0.CO;2-D
30. Richardson BE, Beckett K, Nowak SJ, Baylies MK. SCAR/WAVE and Arp2/3 are crucial for cytoskeletal remodeling at the site of myoblast fusion. Development 2007; 134:4357-67; PMID:18003739; http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/dev.010678