Use of safety scalpels and other safety practices to reduce sharps injury in the operating room: What is the evidence?

Canadian Journal of Surgery

Volumn 56, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 263-269

  DeGirolamo, Kristin M ^a   Courtemanche, Douglas J ^a   Hill, Warren D ^b   Kennedy, Angie ^a   Skarsgard, Erik D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b BC CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84881472865     PISSN: 0008428X     EISSN: 14882310     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1503/cjs.003812     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Jagger J, Berguer R, Phillips EK, et al. Increase in sharps injuries in surgical settings versus nonsurgical settings after passage of national needlestick legislation. J Am Coll Surg 2010;210:496-502.
2. Frequently Asked Questions: The Needlestick Safety and Prevention Act. In: Occupational Safety & Health Administration [a website of the United States Department of Labor]. Available: www.osha.gov/needlesticks/needlefaq.html (accessed 2012 Jan. 7).
3. Occupational Health and Safety Act. Ontario Regulation 474/07: Needle Safety. In: e-Laws [a website of Service Ontario]. Available: www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/regs/english/elaws-regs-070474-e.htm (accessed 2012 Jan. 7).
4. Guidelines Part 6: G6.36(1.3) Not clinically appropriate. In: OHS Regulation [as website of Worksafe BC]. Available: www2.worksafebc.com/ Publications/OHSRegulation/GuidelinePart6.asp#SectionNumber:G6.36-1.3 (accessed 2011 Sept. 29).
5. American Heart Association. Appendix: Evidence-Based Worksheets 2010 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations and 2010 American Heart Association and American Red Cross International Consensus on First Aid Science With Treatment Recommendations. Circulation. 2010;122:S606-S638. Available: http://circ.ahajournals.org/content/122/16-suppl-2/S606.full.pdf+html (accessed 2012 Jan. 7).
6. Evidence Reviews [video]. In: EPIQ [website of Evidence-based Practice for Improving Quality]. Available: www.epiq.ca/Resources/EvidenceReviewVideo/ tabid/118/Default.aspx (accessed 2012 Jan. 7).
7. Tanner J, Parkinson H. Double gloving to reduce surgical crossinfection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006;3:CD003087.
8. Parantainen A, Verbeek JH, Lavoie MC, et al. Blunt versus sharp suture needles for preventing percutaneous exposure incidents in surgical staff. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011;11:CD009170.
9. Watt AM, Patkin M, Sinnott MJ, et al. Scalpel safety in the operative setting: a systematic review. Surgery 2010;147:98-106.
10. Stringer B, Haines T, Goldsmith CH, et al. Hands-free technique in the operating room: reduction in body fluid exposure and the value of a training video. Public Health Rep 2009;124(Suppl 1):169-79.
11. Stringer B, Infante-Rivard C, Hanley JA. Effectiveness of the handsfree technique in reducing operating theatre injuries. Occup Environ Med 2002;59:703-7.
12. Folin A, Nyberg B, Nordstrom G. Reducing blood exposures during orthopedic surgical procedures. AORN J 2000;71:573-6, 579, 581-2.
13. Eggleston MK Jr, Wax JR, Philput C, et al. Use of surgical pass trays to reduce intraoperative glove perforations. J Matern Fetal Med 1997;6: 245-7.
14. Bebbington MW, Treissman MJ. The use of a surgical assist device to reduce glove perforations in postdelivery vaginal repair: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;175:862-6.
15. Tokars JI, Bell DM, Culver DH, et al. Percutaneous injuries during surgical procedures. JAMA 1992;267:2899-904.
16. Bell PR, McNicholl BP. The needle catcher - a safer way to suture. Surgeon 2009;7:251-2.
17. Corlett MP, England DW, Kidner NL, et al. Reduction in incidence of glove perforation during laparotomy wound closure by 'no touch' technique. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1993;75:330-2.
18. Henry K, Campbell S. Needlestick/sharps injuries and HIV exposure among health care workers. National estimates based on a survey of U.S. hospitals. Minn Med 1995;78:41-4.
19. EPINet. EPINet Sharp-Object Injury and Blood and Body Fluid Exposure Reports by year. University of Virginia: International Health Care Worker Safety Center. Available: www.healthsystem.virginia.edu/pub/epinet/epinetdatareports. html#reports (accessed 2013 June 18).
20. Fullerton M, Gibbons V. Needlestick injuries in a healthcare setting in New Zealand. N Z Med J 2011;124:33-9.
21. Kessler CS, McGuinn M, Spec A, et al. Underreporting of blood and body fluid exposures among health care students and trainees in the acute care setting: a 2007 survey. Am J Infect Control 2011;39: 129-34.
22. Sebold EJ, Jordan LR. Intraoperative glove perforation. A comparative analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1993;297:242-4.
23. Sinnott M, Wall D. "SCALPEL SAFETY": How safe (or dangerous) are safety scalpels? Int J Surg 2008;6:176-7.
24. Perry J, Parker G, Jagger J. Scalpel blades: reducing injury risk. Adv Exposure Prevent 2003;6:37-48.
25. International Healthcare Worker Safety Center. In: website of the University of Virginia Health System. Available: www.healthsystem.virginia.edu/ internet/epinet/safetydevice/surgical.cfm#Scalpels (accessed 2012 Jan. 7).
26. Linkin DR, Sausman C, Santos L, et al. Applicability of healthcare failure mode and effects analysis to healthcare epidemiology: evaluation of the sterilization and use of surgical instruments. Clin Infect Dis 2005; 41:1014-9.
27. Hwang H. Warning: "Safety" scalpels are dangerous [letter]. B C Med J 2009; 51:103.
28. American College of Surgeons Committee on Perioperative Care. Statement on surgical sharps safety. Bull Am Coll Surg 2007;92.