Potential challenges for engineering students working on teams with liberal arts students: Recommendations for structuring and managing multidisciplinary projects

Research in Engineering Education Symposium 2008

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 191-193

[No Author Info available]

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84881458789     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (5)

1. Atman, C. J. (2007). Center for the Advancement of Engineering Education: An Overview of Accomplishments To Date. Paper presented at the 2007 NAE/CASEE Dane and Mary Louise Miller SYMPOSIUM. from http://www.nae.edu/nae/caseecomnew. nsf/weblinks/NFOY-77U4FV?OpenDocument.
2. Burack, C., & Franks, S. E. (2004). Telling Stories About Engineering: Group Dynamics and Resistance to Diversity. NWSA Journal, 16(1), 79-95.
3. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Edison, New Jersey: Adeline Transaction.
4. Mansilla, V. B., & Duraising, E. D. (2007). Targeted Assessment of Students' Interdisciplinary Work: An Empirically Grounded Framework Proposed. Journal of Higher Education, 78(2), 215-237.
5. Stevens, R., Amos, D., Jocuns, A., & Garrison, L. (2007). Engineering as Lifestyle and a Meritocracy of Difficulty: Two pervasive beliefs among engineering students and their possible effects. Paper presented at the Annual Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education.