Making the relationship between risk assessment and risk management more intimate

Environmental Science and Technology

Volumn 47, Issue 15, 2013, Pages 8095-8096

  Calow, P ^a   Forbes, V E ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHEMICAL POLLUTANT; ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; RISK ASSESSMENT;

COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; ECONOMIC ASPECT; ECOSYSTEM; HEALTH HAZARD; HUMAN; LIFESPAN; POLICY; RESEARCH; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK MANAGEMENT; SCIENTIST; SHORT SURVEY; UNCERTAINTY;

EUROPE;

CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; HUMANS; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK MANAGEMENT;

EID: 84881442298     PISSN: 0013936X     EISSN: 15205851     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/es402705y     Document Type: Short Survey

References (5)

1. NRC. Science and Decisions: Advancing Risk Assessment; Committee on Improving Risk Analysis; National Research Council, National Academy of Sciences: Washington, DC, 2009.
2. SCHER (Scientific Committee on Health and Environmental Risks), SCENIHR (Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks), SCCS (Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety). Making Risk Assessment More Relevant for Risk Management; European Commission: Brussels, 2013.
3. Jasanoff, S. Designs on Nature; Princeton University Press: Princeton and Oxford, 2005.
4. Calow, P.; Forbes, V. E. Ecological risk assessment should be value-relevant but not value-biased Integr. Environ. Assess. Manage. 2010, 6, 784-785
5. Pielke, R. A. The Honest Broker; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 2007.