Acoustic angiography: A new imaging modality for assessing microvasculature architecture

International Journal of Biomedical Imaging

Volumn 2013, Issue , 2013, Pages

  Gessner, Ryan C ^a   Frederick, C Brandon ^a   Foster, F Stuart ^b   Dayton, Paul A ^a  

^a USA and North Carolina State University   (United States)

^b SUNNYBROOK RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL IMAGING; CONTRAST IMAGING; CONTRAST-ENHANCED; CONTRAST-TO-TISSUE RATIO; DUAL-FREQUENCY ULTRASOUND; IMAGING MODALITY; MICRO-VASCULATURE; PRECLINICAL IMAGING;

ANGIOGRAPHY; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; MEDICAL IMAGING; TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER; ULTRASONIC TRANSDUCERS;

TISSUE;

CONTRAST MEDIUM; FENESTRA VC; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ACOUSTIC ANGIOGRAPHY; ACOUSTIC TECHNOLOGY; AMPLIFIER; ANGIOGRAPHY; ANGIOGRAPHY DEVICE; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNER; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; FILTER; GENERATOR; MICRO-COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; MICROBUBBLE; MICROVASCULATURE; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PHOTOACOUSTIC TOMOGRAPHY; PHOTOACOUSTICS; RAT; TUMOR MODEL; TUMOR VASCULARIZATION; ULTRASOUND SCANNER; ULTRASOUND TRANSDUCER;

EID: 84881425138     PISSN: 16874188     EISSN: 16874196     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1155/2013/936593     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Carmeliet P., Angiogenesis in life, disease and medicine. Nature 2005 438 7070 932 936 2-s2.0-30744479430 10.1038/nature04478 (Pubitemid 43093958)
2. Egeblad M., Nakasone E. S., Werb Z., Tumors as organs: complex tissues that interface with the entire organism. Developmental Cell 2010 18 6 884 901 2-s2.0-77955928161
3. Bullitt E., Ewend M., Vredenburgh J., Friedman A., Lin W., Wilber K., Zeng D., Aylward S. R., Reardon D., Computerized assessment of vessel morphological changes during treatment of glioblastoma multiforme: report of a case imaged serially by MRA over four years. NeuroImage 2009 47 2 T143 T151 2-s2.0-67749101273 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.10.067
4. Li C.-Y., Shan S., Huang Q., Initial stages of tumor cell-induced angiogenesis: evaluation via skin window chambers in rodent models. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2000 92 2 143 147 (Pubitemid 30089871)
5. Schambach S. J., Bag S., Groden C., Schilling L., Brockmann M. A., Vascular imaging in small rodents using micro-CT. Methods 2010 50 1 26 35 2-s2.0-72149089580 10.1016/j.ymeth.2009.09.003
6. Ungersma S. E., Pacheco G., Ho C., Yee S. F., Ross J., Van Bruggen N., Peale F. V. Jr., Ross S., Carano R. A. D., Vessel imaging with viable tumor analysis for quantification of tumor angiogenesis. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 2010 63 6 1637 1647 2-s2.0-77952740515 10.1002/mrm.22442
7. Korpanty G., Carbon J. G., Grayburn P. A., Fleming J. B., Brekken R. A., Monitoring response to anticancer therapy by targeting microbubbles to tumor vasculature. Clinical Cancer Research 2007 13 1 323 330 2-s2.0-33846305065 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-1313 (Pubitemid 46121886)
8. Xuan J. W., Bygrave M., Jiang H., Valiyeva F., Dunmore-Buyze J., Holdsworth D. W., Izawa J. I., Bauman G., Moussa M., Winter S. F., Greenberg N. M., Chin J. L., Drangova M., Fenster A., Lacefield J. C., Functional neoangiogenesis imaging of genetically engineered mouse prostate cancer using three-dimensional power doppler ultrasound. Cancer Research 2007 67 6 2830 2839 2-s2.0-34047260962 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-3944 (Pubitemid 46548973)
9. Cheung A. M. Y., Brown A. S., Cucevic V., Roy M., Needles A., Yang V., Hicklin D. J., Kerbel R. S., Foster F. S., Detecting vascular changes in tumour xenografts using micro-ultrasound and micro-CT following treatment with VEGFR-2 blocking antibodies. Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology 2007 33 8 1259 1268 2-s2.0-34547115692 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2007.01.015 (Pubitemid 47102516)
10. Barua A., Bitterman P., Bahr J. M., Bradaric M. J., Hales D. B., Luborsky J. L., Abramowicz J. S., Detection of tumor-associated neoangiogenesis by doppler ultrasonography during early-stage ovarian cancer in laying hens: a preclinical model of human spontaneous ovarian cancer. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine 2010 29 2 173 182 2-s2.0-75749109449
11. Niermann K. J., Fleischer A. C., Huamani J., Yankeelov T. E., Kim D. W., Wilson W. D., Hallahan D. E., Measuring tumor perfusion in control and treated murine tumors: correlation of microbubble contrast-enhanced sonography to dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine 2007 26 6 749 756 2-s2.0-34249864501 (Pubitemid 46870342)
12. Hoyt K., Warram J. M., Umphrey H., Belt L., Lockhart M. E., Robbin M. L., Zinn K. R., Determination of breast cancer response to bevacizumab therapy using contrast-enhanced ultrasound and artificial neural networks. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine 2010 29 4 577 585 2-s2.0-77951462041
13. Kruse D. E., Ferrara K. W., A new imaging strategy using wideband transient response of ultrasound contrast agents. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control 2005 52 8 1320 1329 2-s2.0-27644566583 10.1109/TUFFC.2005.1509790 (Pubitemid 41560486)
14. Bouakaz A., Krenning B. J., Vletter W. B., Ten Cate F. J., De Jong N., Contrast superharmonic imaging: A Feasibility Study. Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology 2003 29 4 547 553 2-s2.0-0038062991 10.1016/S0301-5629(03)00012-7 (Pubitemid 36561422)
15. Yen C.-K., Su S.-Y., Shen C.-C., Li M.-N., Dual high-frequency difference excitation for contrast detection. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control 2008 55 10 2164 2176 2-s2.0-54049122299 10.1109/TUFFC.916
16. Stephens D. N., Kruse D. E., Ergun A. S., Barnes S., Lu X. M., Ferrara K. W., Efficient array design for sonotherapy. Physics in Medicine and Biology 2008 53 14 3943 3969 2-s2.0-47649083964 10.1088/0031-9155/53/14/014 (Pubitemid 352020274)
17. Gessner R., Lukacs M., Lee M., Cherin E., Foster F. S., Dayton P. A., High-resolution, high-contrast ultrasound imaging using a prototype dual-frequency transducer: in vitro and in vivo studies. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control 2010 57 8 1772 1781 2-s2.0-77955385744 10.1109/TUFFC.2010.1615
18. Yuan H., Schroeder T., Bowsher J. E., Hedlund L. W., Wong T., Dewhirst M. W., Intertumoral differences in hypoxia selectivity of the PET imaging agent64Cu(II)-diacetyl-bis(N4-methylthiosemicarbazone). Journal of Nuclear Medicine 2006 47 6 989 998 2-s2.0-33746089972 (Pubitemid 46939952)
19. Streeter J. E., Gessner R., Miles I., Dayton P. A., Improving sensitivity in ultrasound molecular imaging by tailoring contrast agent size distribution: in vivo studies. Molecular Imaging 2010 9 2 87 95 2-s2.0-77951797196 10.2310/7290.2010.00005
20. Zhang E. Z., Laufer J. G., Pedley R. B., Beard P. C., In vivo high-resolution 3D photoacoustic imaging of superficial vascular anatomy. Physics in Medicine and Biology 2009 54 4 1035 1046 2-s2.0-63649150845 10.1088/0031-9155/54/4/014
21. Laufer J., Johnson P., Zhang E., In vivo preclinical photoacoustic imaging of tumor vasculature development and therapy. Journal of Biomedical Optics 2012 17 5, article 056016 10.1117/1.JBO.17.5.056016
22. Abdelmoneim S. S., Bernier M., Scott C. G., Dhoble A., Ness S. A. C., Hagen M. E., Moir S., McCully R. B., Pellikka P. A., Mulvagh S. L., Safety of contrast agent use during stress echocardiography in patients with elevated right ventricular systolic pressure: A Cohort Study. Circulation 2010 3 3 240 248 2-s2.0-77953640671 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.109.895029
23. Abdelmoneim S. S., Bernier M., Scott C. G., Dhoble A., Ness S. A. C., Hagen M. E., Moir S., McCully R. B., Pellikka P. A., Mulvagh S. L., Safety of contrast agent use during stress echocardiography. A 4-Year experience from a single-center cohort study of 26,774 Patients. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2009 2 9 1048 1056 2-s2.0-70149086779 10.1016/j.jcmg.2009.03.020