Introduction

Species at Risk: Using Economic Incentives to Shelter Endangered Species on Private Lands

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 1-22

  Shogren, Jason F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84881394835     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Editorial

References (39)

1. Bayon, R. 2002. A bull market in⋯ woodpeckers? Milken Institute Review (first quarter): 30-39.
2. Bean, Michael J. 1997. Review of "Private property and the Endangered Species Act: Saving habitat, protecting homes." BioScience 49:825.
3. -. 1998. The Endangered Species Act and private land: Four lessons learned from the past quarter century. Environmental Law Reporter 28: 10701-10710.
4. -. 1999. Endangered species? Endangered act? Environment 41:12-38.
5. Bean, M., and D. Wilcove. 1997. The private-land problem. Conservation Biology 11:1-2.
6. Beissinger, S., and J. Perrine. 2001. Extinction, recovery, and the Endangered Species Act. Pp. 51-71 in Protecting endangered species in the United States: Biological needs, political realities, economic choices, edited by J. Shogren and J. Tschirhart. New York: Cambridge University Press.
7. Blume, L., D. Rubinfeld, and P. Shapiro. 1984. The taking of land: When should compensation be paid? Quarterly Journal of Economics 100:71-92.
8. Brown, Gardner Jr., and Jason Shogren. 1998. Economics of the Endangered Species Act. Journal of Economic Perspectives 12:3-20.
9. Dawson, D., and J. Shogren. 2001. An update on priorities and expenditures under the Endangered Species Act. Land Economics 77:527-532.
10. Defenders of Wildlife. 2002. Conservation in America: State government incentive for habitat conservation. Washington, D.C. March.
11. Easterbrook, G. 1998. Getting around the takings problem. PERC Reprints (Bozeman, Mont.) 16, no. 2 (June).
12. Originally published in New Republic, 2 March 1998.
13. Eisner, T., J. Lubchenco, E. O. Wilson, D. Wilcove, and M. Bean. 1995. Building a scientifically sound policy for protecting endangered species. Science 268:1231-1232.
14. Epstein, R. 1985. Takings: Private property and power of eminent domain. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
15. -. 1995. Simple rules for a complex world. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
16. Farrier, D. 1995. Conserving biodiversity on private land: Incentives for management or compensation for lost expectations? Harvard Environmental Law Review 19:303-408.
17. General Accounting Office (GAO). 1995. Endangered Species Act: Information on species protection on nonfederal lands. Washington, D.C. GAO/RCED-95-16 (Dec. 1994).
18. Innes, Robert, Stephan Polasky, and John Tschirhart. 1998. Takings, compensation, and endangered species protection on private lands. Journal of Economic Perspectives 12, no. 3: 35-52.
19. Korfmacher, K., and E. Elsom. 1998. Voluntary incentive for farmland preservation in Central Ohio: What do farmers think? Working paper 98-4, Center for Agriculture in the Environment, American Farmland Trust. DeKalb, Ill.: Northern Illinois University.
20. Kruckenberg, L. 2000. A conservation crystal ball. Wyoming Wildlife, February.
21. Leopold, A. 1949. A Sand County almanac, and sketches here and there. New York: Oxford University Press.
22. Mann, C, and M. Plummer. 1995. Noah's choice: The future of endangered species. New York: Knopf.
23. Matthews, M. 1999. Standing up for the underdog. High Country News, 16 August.
24. McEvoy, A. 1998. Markets and ethics in U.S. property law. Pp. 94-113 in Who owns America? Social conflict over property rights, edited by H. Jacobs. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
25. Melious, J., and R. Thornton. 1999. Contractual ecosystem management under the Endangered Species Act: Can federal agencies make enforceable commitments? Ecology Law Quarterly 26, no. 3: 489-542.
26. National Research Council. 1995. Science and the Endangered Species Act. Washington, D.C: National Academy Press.
27. Norton, G. 2002. Helping citizens conserve their own land-and America's. New York Times, 20 April.
28. Parkhurst, Gregory, Jason Shogren, Chris Bastian, Paul Kivi, Jennifer Donner, and Rodney Smith. 2002. Agglomeration bonus: An incentive mechanism to reunite fragmented habitat for biodiversity conservation. Ecological Economics 41:305-328.
29. Pinchot, G. 1947. Breaking new ground. New York: Harcourt, Brace.
30. Sagoff, M. 1997. Muddle or muddle through: Takings jurisprudence meets the Endangered Species Act. 'William and Mary Law Review 38:825-993.
31. Shogren, Jason F., ed. 1998. Private property and the Endangered Species Act: Saving habitat, protecting homes. Austin: University of Texas Press.
32. Shogren, J. F., J. Tschirhart, T. Anderson, A. W. Ando, S. R. Beissinger, D. Brookshire, G. M. Brown Jr., D. Coursey, R. Innes, S. M. Meyer, and S. Polasky. 1999. Why economics matters for endangered species protection. Conservation Biology 13:1257-1261.
33. Smith, Rodney B., and Jason F. Shogren. 2002. Voluntary incentive design for endangered species protection. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 43:169-187.
34. Thompson, Barton S. Jr. 1997. The Endangered Species Act: A case study in takings and incentives. Stanford Law Review 49:305-376.
35. Turner, J., and J. Rylander. 1998. The private lands challenge: Integrating biodiversity conservation and private property. Pp. 138-144 in Private property and the Endangered Species Act: Saving habitat, protecting homes, edited by J. Shogren. Austin: University of Texas Press.
36. U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). 1998. Conservation Reserve Program: Oregon State Enhancement Program. Farm Service Agency. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.
37. Whicker, A. S., and J. K. Detling. 1988. Ecological consequences of prairie dog disturbances. BioScience 38:778-785.
38. Wilcove, D., D. Rothstein, J. Dubow, A. Phillips, and E. Losos. 2000. Precious heritage: The status of biodiversity science in the United States. New York: Oxford University Press.
39. Wu, J. J., and W. Boggess. 1999. The optimal allocation oficonservation funds. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 38:302-321.