Priority weight intervals derived from intuitionistic multiplicative preference relations

IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 642-654

  Xu, Zeshui ^a  

^a PLA UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

Decision making; error matrix; error propagation; geometric aggregation operator; intuitionistic multiplicative preference relation

Indexed keywords

AGGREGATION OPERATOR; DECISION MAKER'S PREFERENCES; DECISION MAKERS; ERROR MATRICES; ERROR PROPAGATION; MULTIPLICATIVE PREFERENCE RELATIONS; PREFERENCE INFORMATION; PRIORITY WEIGHTS;

MATHEMATICAL OPERATORS;

DECISION MAKING;

EID: 84881335555     PISSN: 10636706     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TFUZZ.2012.2226893     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. T. L. Saaty, "A scaling method for priorities in hierarchy structures," J. Math. Psychology, vol. 15, pp. 234-281, 1977.
2. T. L. Saaty, The Analytic Hierarchy Process. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1980.
3. R. E. Jensen, "An alternative scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures," J. Math. Psychology, vol. 28, pp. 317-332, 1984.
4. T. L. Saaty and L. G.Vargas, "Comparison of eigenvalue, logarithmic least squares and least squares methods in estimating ratios," Math. Model., vol. 5, pp. 309-324, 1984.
5. K. O. Cogger and P. L. Yu, "Eigenweight vectors and least-distance approximation for revealed preference in pairwise weight ratios," J. Optim. Theory Appl., vol. 46, pp. 483-491, 1985. (Pubitemid 15549690)
6. G. Crawford and C. Williams, "A note on the analysis of subjective judgment matrices," J. Math. Psychology, vol. 29, pp. 387-405, 1985.
7. M. M. Xia, Z. S. Xu, and H. C. Liao, "Preference relations based on intuitionistic multiplicative information," IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., DOI:10.1109/TFUZZ.2012.2202907.
8. Z. S. Xu, "Intuitionistic preference relations and their application in group decision making," Inf. Sci., vol. 177, pp. 2363-2379, 2007.
9. Z. S. Xu, "Intuitionistic fuzzy multi-attribute decision making: An interactive method," IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 514-525, Jun. 2012.
10. E. M. Pugh and G. H. Winslow, The analysis of physical measurements. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1966.
11. K.Yoon, "The propagation of errors in multiple attribute decision analysis: A practical approach," J. Operational Res. Soc., vol. 40, pp. 681-686, 1989.
12. Z. S. Xu, "An error-analysis-based method for the priority of an intuitionistic preference relation in decision making," Knowledge-Based Syst., vol. 33, pp. 173-179, 2012.
13. Z. S. Xu, "Intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operators," IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 1179-1187, Dec. 2007.
14. Z. S. Xu and Q. L. Da, "The uncertain OWA operator," Int. J. Intell. Syst., vol. 17, pp. 569-575, 2002. (Pubitemid 34566426)
15. S. A. Orlovsky, "Decision-making with a fuzzy preference relation," Fuzzy Sets Syst., vol. 1, pp. 155-167, 1978.
16. T. Tanino, "Fuzzy preference ordering in group decision making," Fuzzy Sets Syst., vol. 12, pp. 117-131, 1984. (Pubitemid 14569423)
17. J. Kacprzyk, "Group decision making with a fuzzy linguistic majority," Fuzzy Sets Syst., vol. 18, pp. 105-118, 1986.
18. F. Chiclana, F. Herrera, and E. Herrera-Viedma, " Integratingmultiplicative preference relations in a multipurpose decision making model based on fuzzy preference relations," Fuzzy Sets Syst., vol. 122, pp. 277-291, 2001. (Pubitemid 32590554)
19. E. Herrera-Viedma, F. Herrera, and F. Chiclana, "A consensus model for multi-person decision making with different preference structures," IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern., A, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 394-402, May 2002. (Pubitemid 35426921)
20. J. Ma, Z. P. Fan, Y. P. Jiang, and J. Y. Mao, "An optimization approach to multi-person decision making based on different formats of preference information," IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern., A, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 876-889, Sep. 2006.
21. Z. S. Xu and J. Chen, "MAGDM linear programming models with distinct uncertain preference structures," IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern., B, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 1356-1370, Oct. 2008.
22. H. Bustince, M. Pagola, R. Mesiar, E.Hullermeier, and F. Herrera, "Grouping, overlap, and generalized bientropic functions for fuzzy modeling of pairwise comparisons fuzzy systems," IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 405-415, Jun. 2012.
23. Z. S. Xu, "Algorithm for priority of fuzzy complementary judgment matrix," J. Syst. Eng., vol. 16, pp. 311-314, 2001.
24. S. E. Bodily, "A delegation process for combining individual utility functions," Manage. Sci., vol. 25, pp. 1035-1041, 1979.
25. H. W. Brock, "The problem of utility weights in group preference aggregation," Oper. Res., vol. 28, pp. 176-187, 1980.
26. R. Ramanathan and L. S.Ganesh, "Group preference aggregation methods employed in AHP: An evaluation and an intrinsic process for deriving members' weightages," Eur. J. Oper. Res., vol. 79, pp. 249-265, 1994.
27. Z. W. Gong, L. S. Li, J. Forrest, and Y. Zhao, "The optimal priority models of the intuitionistic fuzzy preference relation and their application in selecting industries with higher meteorological sensitivity," Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 38, pp. 4394-4402, 2011.
28. Y. M. Wang and C. Parkan, "Optimal aggregation of fuzzy preference relations with an application to broadband internet service selection," Eur. J. Oper. Res., vol. 187, pp. 1476-1486, 2008. (Pubitemid 350236650)
29. Z. S. Xu and R. R. Yager, "Power-geometric operators and their use in group decision making," IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 94-105, Feb. 2010.
30. J. Acźel and T. L. Saaty, "Procedures for synthesizing ratio judgments," J. Math. Psychology, vol. 27, pp. 93-102, 1983.