BI-RADS 3 for Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Clinics of North America

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 561-570

  Comstock, Christopher ^a   Sung, Janice S ^a  

^a MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

American College of Radiology; BI RADS 3; Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System; Magnetic resonance imaging

Indexed keywords

BENIGN TUMOR; BREAST CANCER; BREAST CARCINOMA; BREAST FIBROADENOMA; BREAST IMAGING REPORTING AND DATA SYSTEM; CANCER CLASSIFICATION; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; FOLLOW UP; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HUMAN; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; MAMMOGRAPHY; MULTICENTER STUDY (TOPIC); NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; REVIEW; SIGNAL DETECTION;

EID: 84881330924     PISSN: 10649689     EISSN: 15579786     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.mric.2013.04.006     Document Type: Review

References (22)

1. Ikeda D.M., Hylton N.M., Kuhl C.K., et al. BI-RADS: magnetic resonance imaging. Breast imaging reporting and data system: ACR BI-RADS-breast imaging atlas 2003, American College of Radiology, Reston (VA). 1st edition. C.J. D'Orsi, E.B. Mendelson, D.M. Ikeda (Eds.).
2. Yasmeen S., Romano P.S., Pettinger M., et al. Frequency and predictive value of a mammographic recommendation for short-interval follow-up. JNatl Cancer Inst 2003, 95(6):429-436.
3. Caplan L.S., Blackman D., Nadel M., et al. Coding mammograms using the classification "probably benign finding-short interval follow-up suggested". AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999, 172(2):339-342.
4. Varas X., Leborgne F., Leborgne J.H. Nonpalpable, probably benign lesions: role of follow-up mammography. Radiology 1992, 184(2):409-414.
5. Vizcaino I., Gadea L., Andreo L., et al. Short-term follow-up results in 795 nonpalpable probably benign lesions detected at screening mammography. Radiology 2001, 219(2):475-483.
6. Sickles E.A. Management of probably benign breast lesions. Radiol Clin North Am 1995, 33(6):1123-1130.
7. Sickles E.A. Periodic mammographic follow-up of probably benign lesions: results in 3,184 consecutive cases. Radiology 1991, 179(2):463-468.
8. Sickles E.A. Nonpalpable, circumscribed, noncalcified solid breast masses: likelihood of malignancy based on lesion size and age of patient. Radiology 1994, 192(2):439-442.
9. Sickles E.A. Probably benign breast lesions: when should follow-up be recommended and what is the optimal follow-up protocol?. Radiology 1999, 213(1):11-14.
10. Kuhl C.K., Schmutzler R.K., Leutner C.C., et al. Breast MR imaging screening in 192 women proved or suspected to be carriers of a breast cancer susceptibility gene: preliminary results. Radiology 2000, 215(1):267-279.
11. Liberman L., Morris E.A., Benton C.L., et al. Probably benign lesions at breast magnetic resonance imaging: preliminary experience in high-risk women. Cancer 2003, 98(2):377-388.
12. Kriege M., Brekelmans C.T., Boetes C., et al. Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition. NEngl J Med 2004, 351(5):427-437.
13. Hartman A.R., Daniel B.L., Kurian A.W., et al. Breast magnetic resonance image screening and ductal lavage in women at high genetic risk for breast carcinoma. Cancer 2004, 100(3):479-489.
14. Sadowski E.A., Kelcz F. Frequency of malignancy in lesions classified as probably benign after dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI examination. JMagn Reson Imaging 2005, 21(5):556-564.
15. Kuhl C.K., Schrading S., Leutner C.C., et al. Mammography, breast ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for surveillance of women at high familial risk for breast cancer. JClin Oncol 2005, 23(33):8469-8476.
16. Eby P.R., DeMartini W.B., Gutierrez R.L., et al. Characteristics of probably benign breast MRI lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009, 193(3):861-867.
17. Weinstein S.P., Hanna L.G., Gatsonis C., et al. Frequency of malignancy seen in probably benign lesions at contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging: findings from ACRIN 6667. Radiology 2010, 255(3):731-737.
18. Warner E., Plewes D.B., Hill K.A., et al. Surveillance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, mammography, and clinical breast examination. JAMA 2004, 292(11):1317-1325.
19. Leung J.W., Sickles E.A. Multiple bilateral masses detected on screening mammography: assessment of need for recall imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000, 175(1):23-29.
20. Schnall M.D., Blume J., Bluemke D.A., et al. Diagnostic architectural and dynamic features at breast MR imaging: multicenter study. Radiology 2006, 238(1):42-53.
21. Liberman L., Mason G., Morris E.A., et al. Does Size Matter? Positive Predictive Value of MRI- Detected Lesions as a Function of Lesion Size. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006, 186(2):426-430.
22. Ha R, Brennan S, Lee CH, et al. Periodic MRI Follow-up of Probably Benign Breast Lesions: Results of 3987 Consecutive Cases. Presented at RSNA, Chicago, 2011.