The communicative participation item bank (CPIB): Item bank alibration and development of a disorder-generic short form

Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research

Volumn 56, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 1190-1208

  Baylor, Carolyn ^a   Yorkston, Kathryn ^a   Eadie, Tanya ^a   Kim, Jiseon ^a   Chung, Hyewon ^b   Amtmann, Dagmar ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b Chungnam National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Assessment; Communicative participation; Dysarthria; Item response theory; Outcomes; Outcomes measurement; Voice disorders

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS; ARTICLE; ASSESSMENT; CALIBRATION; COMMUNICATIVE PARTICIPATION; DISABILITY; DYSARTHRIA; FEMALE; HEAD AND NECK TUMOR; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; ITEM RESPONSE THEORY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS; OUTCOMES; OUTCOMES MEASUREMENT; PARKINSON DISEASE; QUESTIONNAIRE; REPRODUCIBILITY; SELF REPORT; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; STANDARD; VALIDATION STUDY; VERY ELDERLY; VOICE DISORDER; YOUNG ADULT; COMPLICATION; STANDARDS; VOICE DISORDERS;

ASSESSMENT; COMMUNICATIVE PARTICIPATION; DYSARTHRIA; ITEM RESPONSE THEORY; OUTCOMES; OUTCOMES MEASUREMENT; VOICE DISORDERS;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS; CALIBRATION; COMMUNICATION; DISABILITY EVALUATION; DYSARTHRIA; FEMALE; HEAD AND NECK NEOPLASMS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS; PARKINSON DISEASE; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SELF REPORT; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; VOICE DISORDERS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84881306452     PISSN: 10924388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2012/12-0140)     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2004). Preferred practice patterns for the profession of speech-language pathology. Retrieved from www.asha.org/NR/rdonlyres/C589BA8F-5931-48AA-8E02-59CF989DC01F/0/v1PPPSLP.pdf.
2. Baylor, C., Burns, M., Eadie, T., Britton, D., & Yorkston, K. (2011). A qualitative study of interference with communicative participation across communication disorders in adults. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 20, 269-287.
3. Baylor, C., Hula, W., Donovan, N., Doyle, P., Kendall, D., & Yorkston, K. (2011). An introduction to item response theory and Rasch models for speech-language pathologists. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 20, 243-259.
4. Baylor, C., Yorkston, K. M., Eadie, T. L., Miller, R., & Amtmann, D. (2008). Levels of Speech Usage: A self-report scale for describing how people use speech. Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology, 16, 191-198.
5. Baylor, C., Yorkston, K., Eadie, T., Miller, R. M., & Amtmann, D. (2009). Developing the Communicative Participation Item Bank: Rasch analysis results from a spasmodic dysphonia sample. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 52, 1302-1320.
6. Becker, S., Strobl, R., Cieza, A., Grill, E., Harreus, U., & Tschiesner, U. (2011). Graphical modeling can be used to illustrate associations between variables describing functioning in head and neck cancer patients. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 64, 885-892.
7. Bentler, P. M. (1980). Multivariate analysis with latent variables: Causal modeling. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 419-456.
8. Bowen, J., Gibbons, L., Gianas, A., & Kraft, G. H. (2001). Self-administered Expanded Disability Status Scale with functional system scores correlates well with a physician-administered test. Multiple Sclerosis, 7, 201-206.
9. Brown, M., Dijkers, M. P. J. M., Gordon, W. A., Ashman, T., Charatz, H., & Cheng, Z. (2004). Participation Objective, Participation Subjective: A measure of participation combining outsider and insider perspectives. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 19, 459-481.
10. Browne, M., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. Bollen & J. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). London, England: Sage.
11. Cedarbaum, J. M., Stambler, N., Malta, E., Fuller, C., Hilt, D., Thurmond, B., & Nakanishi, A. (1999). The ALSFRS-R: A revised ALS functional rating scale that incorporates assessments of respiratory function. Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 169, 13-21.
12. Cella, D., Yount, S., Rothrock, N., Gershon, R., Cook, K., Reeve, B., PROMIS Cooperative Group. (2007). The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): Progress of an NIH roadmap cooperative group during its first two years. Medical Care, 45(5, Suppl. 1), S3-S11.
13. Chen, A., Frankowski, R., Bishop-Leone, J., Hebert, T., Leyk, S., Lewin, J., & Goepfert, H. (2001). The development and validation of a dysphagia-specific quality-of-life questionnaire for patients with head and neck cancer: The M. D. Anderson Dysphagia Inventory. Archives of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 127, 870-876.
14. Chen, W.-H., & Thissen, D. (1997). Local dependence indexes for item pairs using item response theory. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 22, 265-289.
15. Choi, S. W., Gibbons, L., & Crane, P. K. (2011). Lordif: An R package for detecting differential item functioning using iterative hybrid ordinal logistic regression/item response theory and Monte Carlo simulations. Journal of Statistical Software, 39(8), 1-30.
16. Cook, K., Bombardier, C., Bamer, A., Choi, S. W., Kroenke, K., & Fann, J. R. (2011). Do somatic and cognitive symptoms of traumatic brain injury confound depression screening? Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 92, 818-823.
17. Cook, K., O'Malley, K. J., & Roddey, T. S. (2005). Dynamic assessment of health outcomes: Time to let the CAT out of the bag? Health Services Research, 40, 1694-1711.
18. Crane, P. K., Gibbons, L., Jolley, L., & van Belle, G. (2006). Differential item functioning analysis with ordinal logistic regression techniques: DIFdetect and difwithpar. Medical Care, 44(11, Suppl. 3), S115-S123.
19. Crane, P. K., Gibbons, L., Ocepek-Weiklson, K., Cook, K., Cella, D., Narasimhalu, K., Teresi, J. A. (2007). A comparison of three sets of criteria for determining the presence of differential item functioning using ordinal logistic regression. Quality of Life Research, 16(Suppl. 1), 69-84.
20. Crane, P. K., Van Belle, G., & Larson, E. B. (2004). Test bias in a cognitive test: Differential item functioning in the CASI. Statistics in Medicine, 23, 241-256.
21. deChamplain, A. F. (2010). A primer on classical test theory and item response theory for assessments in medical education. Medical Education, 44, 109-117.
22. DeWalt, D. A., Rothrock, N., Yount, S., & Stone, A. A. (2007). Evaluation of item candidates: The PROMIS qualitative item review. Medical Care, 45(5, Suppl. 1), 1-10.
23. Donovan, N. J., Kendall, D., Young, M. E., & Rosenbek, J. C. (2008). The Communicative Effectiveness Survey: Preliminary evidence of construct validity. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 17, 335-347.
24. Doyle, P. J., Hula, W. D., McNeil, M. R., Mikolic, J. M., & Matthews, C. (2005). An application of Rasch analysis to the measurement of communicative functioning. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 48, 1412-1428.
25. Doyle, P. J., McNeil, M. R., Hula, W. D., & Mikolic, J. M. (2003). The Burden of Stroke Scale (BOSS): Validating patient-reported communication difficulty and associated psychological distress in stroke survivors. Aphasiology, 17, 291-304.
26. Eadie, T. L. (2003). The ICF: A proposed framework for comprehensive rehabilitation of individuals who use alaryngeal speech. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 12, 189-197.
27. Eadie, T. L., Yorkston, K. M., Klasner, E. R., Dudgeon, B. J., Deitz, J. C., Baylor, C. R., Amtmann, D. (2006). Measuring communicative participation: A review of self-report instruments in speech-language pathology. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 15, 307-320.
28. Embretson, S., & Reise, S. P. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
29. Flora, D., & Thissen, D. (2002). IRTScore [Computer software]. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, L. L. Thurstone Psychometric Laboratory.
30. Food and Drug Administration. (2009). Guidance for industry: Patient-reported outcome measures: Use in medical product development to support labeling claims. Retrieved from www.fda. gov/downloads/Drugs/Guidances/UCM193282.pdf.
31. Fries, J. F., Bruce, B., & Cella, D. (2005). The promise of PROMIS: Using item response theory to improve assessment of patient-reported outcomes. Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology, 23(Suppl. 39), S53-S57.
32. Garcia, L. J., Laroche, C., & Barrette, J. (2002). Work integration issues go beyond the nature of the communication disorder. Journal of Communication Disorders, 35, 187-211.
33. Gray, C., Baylor, C., Eadie, T., Kendall, D., & Yorkston, K. (2012). The Levels of Speech Usage rating scale: Comparison of client self-ratings with speech pathologist ratings. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 47, 333-344.
34. Greenhalgh, J. (2009). The applications of PROs in clinical practice: What are they, do they work, and why? Quality of Life Research, 18, 115-123.
35. Hartelius, L., Elmberg, M., Holm, R., Lovberg, A.-S., & Nikolaidis, S. (2008). Living with dysarthria: Evaluation of a self-report questionnaire. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 60, 11-19.
36. Hays, R. D., Bjorner, J. B., Revicki, D. A., Spritzer, K. L., & Cella, D. (2009). Development of physical and mental health summary scores from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) global items. Quality of Life Research, 18, 873-880.
37. Hogikyan, N. D., & Sethuraman, G. (1999). Validation of an instrument to measure voice-related quality of life (V-RQOL). Journal of Voice, 13, 557-569.
38. Howe, T. J. (2008). The ICF contextual factors related to speech-language pathology. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 10, 27-37.
39. Howe, T. J., Worrall, L. E., & Hickson, L. M. H. (2008). Interviews with people with aphasia: Environmental factors that influence their community participation. Aphasiology, 22, 1092-1120.
40. Howe, T. J., Worrall, L. E., & Hickson, L. M. H. (2008). Observing people with aphasia: Environmental factors that influence their community participation. Aphasiology, 22, 618-643.
41. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
42. Jacobson, B. H., Johnson, A., Grywalski, C., Silbergleit, A., Jacobson, G., Benninger, M. S., & Newman, C. W. (1997). The Voice Handicap Index (VHI): Development and validation. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 6, 66-70.
43. Jenkinson, C., Fitzpatrick, R., Peto, V., Greenhall, R., & Hyman, N. (1997). The PDQ-8: Development and validation of a short-form Parkinson's disease questionnaire. Psychology and Health, 12, 805-814.
44. Kurtzke, J. F. (1983). Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: An Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS). Neurology, 33, 1444-1452.
45. Law, J., Bunning, K., Byng, S., Farrelly, S., & Heyman, B. (2005). Making sense in primary care: Leveling the playing field for people with communication difficulties. Disability and Society, 20, 169-184.
46. Law, M. (2002). Participation in the occupations of everyday life. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 56, 640-649.
47. Li, C., Thissen, D., & du Toit, S. H. C. (2011). IRTPRO [Computer software]. Chicago, IL: SSI International.
48. Ma, E. P.-M., & Yiu, E. M.-L. (2001). Voice activity and participation profile: Assessing the impact of voice disorders on daily activities. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44, 511-524.
49. Murphy, J. (2006). Perceptions of communication between people with communication disability and general practice staff. Health Expectations, 9, 49-59.
50. Muthén, L., & Muthén, B. (1998). Mplus (Version 6.1) [Computer software]. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
51. Nordehn, G., Meredith, A., & Bye, L. (2006). A preliminary investigation of barriers to achieving patient-centered communication with patients who have stroke-related communication disorders. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 13, 68-77.
52. O'Halloran, R., Worrall, L., & Hickson, L. (2011). Environmental factors that influence communication between patients and their healthcare providers in acute hospital stroke units: An observational study. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 46, 30-47.
53. Orlando, M., & Thissen, D. (2000). Likelihood-based item fit indices for dichotomous item response theory models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 24, 50-64.
54. Orlando, M., & Thissen, D. (2003). Further investigation of the performance of SX2: An item fit index for use with dichotomous item response theory models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27, 289-298.
55. Perenboom, R. J. M., & Chorus, A. M. J. (2003). Measuring participation according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Disability and Rehabilitation, 25, 577-587.
56. Reeve, B. B., Hays, R. D., Bjorner, J. B., Cook, K. F., Crane, P. K., Teresi, J. A. PROMIS Cooperative Group. (2007). Psychometric evaluation and calibration of health-related quality of life item banks. Medical Care, 45(5, Suppl. 1), S22-S31.
57. Revicki, D. A., & Cella, D. F. (1997). Health status assessment for the twenty-first century: Item response theory, item banking, and computer adaptive testing. Quality of Life Research, 6, 595-600.
58. Rogers, S., Gwanne, S., Lowe, D., Humphris, G., Yueh, B., & Weymuller, E. A. (2002). The addition of mood and anxiety domains to the University of Washington Quality of Life Scale. Head and Neck, 24, 521-529.
59. Rosen, C. A., Lee, A. S., Osborne, J., Zullo, T., & Murry, T. (2004). Development and validation of the Voice Handicap Index-10. Laryngoscope, 114, 1549-1556.
60. Samejima, F. (1970). Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores. Psychometrika, 35(1), 139.
61. SPSS. (2008). SPSS 17.0 for Windows [Computer software]. Chicago, IL: Author.
62. Steiger, J. H., & Lind, J. C. (1980, May). Statistically-based tests for the number of common factors. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society, Iowa City, IA.
63. Threats, T. (2007). Access for persons with neurogenic communication disorders: Influences of personal and environmental factors of the ICF. Aphasiology, 21, 67-80.
64. Tucker, L. R., & Lewis, C. (1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 38, 1-10.
65. U.S. Census Bureau. (n.d.). Census Bureau regions and divisions with state FIPS codes. Retrieved from www.census.gov/geo/www/us_regdiv.pdf.
66. Weymuller, E. A., Alsarraf, R., Yueh, B., Deleyiannis, F. W. B., & Coltrera, M. D. (2001). Analysis of the performance characteristics of the University of Washington Quality of Life instrument and its modification (UW-QOL-R). Archives of Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery, 127, 489-493.
67. Whitehill, T., Ma, E. P.-M., & Tse, F. (2010). Environmental barriers to communication for individuals with dysarthria. Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology, 18, 141-144.
68. Whiteneck, G. G. (1994). Measuring what matters: Key rehabilitation outcomes. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 75, 1073-1076.
69. Willis, G. B. (2005). Cognitive interviewing: A tool for improving questionnaire design. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
70. World Health Organization. (2001). International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: ICF. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
71. Yaruss, J. S., & Quesal, R. W. (2006). Overall Assessment of the Speaker's Experience of Stuttering (OASES): Documenting multiple outcomes in stuttering treatment. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 31, 90-115.
72. Orkston, K. M., Baylor, C. R., Deitz, J., Dudgeon, B. J., Eadie, T., Miller, R. M., & Amtmann, D. (2008). Developing a scale of communicative participation: A cognitive interviewing study. Disability and Rehabilitation, 30, 425-433.
73. Yorkston, K. M., Baylor, C. R., Klasner, E. R., Deitz, J., Dudgeon, B. J., Eadie, T., Amtmann, D. (2007). Satisfaction with communicative participation as defined by adults with multiple sclerosis: A qualitative study. Journal of Communication Disorders, 40, 433-451.
74. Zraick, R. I., Atcherson, S. R., & Brown, A. M. (2012). Readability of patient-reported outcome questionnaires for use with persons who stutter. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 37, 20-24.