LigandBox: A database for 3D structures of chemical compounds

Biophysics (Japan)

Volumn 9, Issue , 2013, Pages 113-121

  Kawabata, Takeshi ^a   Sugihara, Yusuke ^b   Fukunishi, Yoshifumi ^c   Nakamura, Haruki ^a  

^a OSAKA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b FUJITSU LABORATORIES LTD   (Japan)

^c NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ADVANCED INDUSTRIAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AIST   (Japan)

Author keywords

Drug; Maximum common substructure; Molecular docking; Virtual screening

Indexed keywords

EID: 84881291627     PISSN: None     EISSN: 13492942     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2142/biophysics.9.113     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Williams, A. J. A perspective of publicly accessible/open-access chemistry database. Drug Discovery Today 13, 495-501 (2008).
2. Noorden, R. V. Chemistry's web of data expands. Nature 483, 524 (2012).
3. Wang, Y., Xiao, J., Suzek, T. O., Zhang, J. & Bryant, S. H. PubChem: A public information system for analyzing bioac-tivities of small molecules. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, W623-W633 (2009).
4. Gaulton, A., Bellis, L. J., Bentro, A. P., Chambers, J., Davies, M., Hersey, A., Light, Y., McGlinchey, S., Michalovich, D., Al-Lazikani, B. & Overington, P. ChEMBL: A large-scale bio-activity database for drug discovery. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, D1100-D1107 (2011).
5. Shoichet, B.K. Virtual screening of chemical libraries. Nature 432, 862-865 (2004).
6. Kolb, P., Ferreira, R. S., Irwin, J. J. & Shoichet, B. K. Docking and chemoinformatic screens for new ligands and targets. Cur. Opn. Biotech. 20, 429-436 (2009).
7. Cosconati, S., Forli, S., Perryman, A. L., Harris, R., Goodsell, D.S. & Olson, A.J. Virtual screening with AutoDock: theory and practice. Expert. Opin. Drug Discov. 5, 597-607 (2010).
8. Taboureau, O., Baell, J. B., Fernandez-Recio, J. & Villoutreix, B.O. Established and emerging trends in computational drug discovery in the structural genomics era. Chem. Biol. 19, 29-41 (2012).
9. Fukunishi, Y., Sugihara, Y., Mikami, Y., Sakai, K., Kusudo, H. & Nakamura, H. Advanced in-silico drug screening to achieve high hit ratio-Development of 3D-compound database-. Synthesiology 2, 64-72 (2009).
10. Lang, P. T., Brozell, S. R., Mukherjee, S., Pettersen, E. F., Meng, E.C., Thomas, V., Rizzo, R. C., Case, D. A., James, T.L. & Kuntz, I. D. DOCK 6: Combining techniques to model RNA-small molecule complexes. RNA 15, 1219-1230 (2009).
11. Morris, G. M., Huey, R., Lindstrom, W., Sanner, M. F., Belew, R. K., Goodsell, D. S. & Olson, A. AutoDock4 and AutoDockTools4: Automated docking with selective receptor flexibility. J. Comp. Chem. 30, 2785-2791 (2009).
12. Fukunishi, Y., Mikami, Y. & Nakamura, H. Similarities among receptor pockets and among compounds: Analysis and application to in silico ligand screening. J. Mol. Graph. Model. 24, 34-35 (2005).
13. Irwin, J. I. & Shoichet, B. K. ZINC-a free database of commercially available compounds for virtual screening. J. Chem. Info. Model. 45, 177-182 (2005).
14. Irwin, J. I., Sterling, T., Mysinger, M.M., Bolstad, E. S. & Coleman, R.G. ZINC: A free tool to discover chemistry for biology. J. Chem. Info. Model. 52, 1757-1768 (2012).
15. Masciocchi, J., Frau, G., Fanton, M., Sturlese, M., Floris, M., Pireddu, L., Palla, P., Cedrati, F., Rodriguez-Tomé, P. & Moro, S. MMsINC: A large-scale chemoinformatics database. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, D284-D290 (2009).
16. Del Rio, A., Barbosa, A.J. M., Caporuscio, F. & Mangiatordi, G. F. CoCoCo: A free suite of multiconformational chemical databases for high-throughput virtual screening purposes. Mol. BioSyst. 6, 2122-2128 (2010).
17. Bolton, E. E., Chen, J., Kim, S., Han, L., He, S., Shi, W., Simonyan, V., Sun, Y., Thiessen, P. A., Wang, J., Yu, B., Zhang, J. & Bryant, S.H. PubChem3D: A new resource for scientists. J. Cheminform. 3, 32 (2011).
18. Sadowski, J. & Gasteiger, J. From atoms and bonds to three-dimensional atomic coordinates: Automatic model builders. Chem. Rev. 93, 2567-2581 (1993).
19. Hawkins, P. C. D., Skillman, G., Warren, G. L., Ellingson, B.A. & Stahl, M. T. Conformer generation with OMEGA: Algorithm and validation using high quality structures from the protein databank and Cambridge structure database. J. Chem. Info. Model. 50, 572-584 (2010).
20. Kawabata, T. Build-up algorithm for atomic correspondence between chemical structures. J. Chem. Info. Model. 51, 1775-1787 (2011).
21. Kanehisa, M., Goto, S., Sato, Y., Furumichi, M. & Tanabe, M. KEGG for integration and interpretation of large-scale molecular data sets. Nucleic Acids Res. 34, D109-D114 (2012).
22. Wang, J., Wolf, R. M., Caldwell, J. W., Kollman, P.A. & Case, D. A. Developing and testing of a general amber force field. J. Comp. Chem. 25, 1157-1174 (2004).
23. Fukunishi, Y. & Nakamura, H. Definition of drug-likeness for compound affinity. J. Chem. Info. Model. 51, 1012-1016 (2011).
24. Mashimo, T., Fukunishi, Y., Orita, M., Katayama, N., Fujita, S. & Nakamura, H. Quantitative analysis of aggregation-solubility relationship by in-silico solubility prediction. International J. High Throughput Screening 1, 99-107 (2010).
25. Kinjo, A. R., Suzuki, H., Yamashita, R., Ikegawa, Y., Kudou, T., Igarashi, R., Kengaku, Y., Cho, H., Standley, D. M., Nakagawa, A. & Nakamura, H. Protein Data Bank Japan (PDBj): Maintaining a structural data archive and resource description framework format. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, D453-D460 (2011).
26. Weininger, D. SMILES, a chemical language and information system. 1. Introduction to methodology and encoding rules. 2. J. Chem. Inf.Comput. Sci. 28, 31-36 (1988).
27. Weininger, D., Weininger, A. & Weininger, J.L. SMILES. 2. a lgorithms for generation of unique SMILES notation. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 29, 97-101 (1989).
28. Carhart, R. E., Smith, H. S. & Venkataraghavan, R. Atom pairs as molecular features in structure-activity studies: Definition and applications. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 25, 64-73 (1985).
29. Ertl, P. Molecular structure input on the web. J. Cheminfo. 2, 1 (2010).
30. Martin, Y. C. Let's not forget tautomers. J. Comput. Aided. Mol. Des. 23, 693-704 (2009).