Dual time point based quantification of metabolic uptake rates in 18F-FDG PET

EJNMMI Research

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 1-11

  van den Hoff, Jörg ^a,b   Hofheinz, Frank ^a   Oehme, Liane ^b   Schramm, Georg ^a   Langner, Jens ^a   Beuthien Baumann, Bettina ^a,b   Steinbach, Jörg ^a   Kotzerke, Jörg ^a,b  

^a INSTITUTE OF ION BEAM PHYSICS AND MATERIALS RESEARCH   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL CARL GUSTAV CARUS   (Germany)

Author keywords

Dual time point; Metabolic rate of FDG; PET quantification; Tracer kinetic modeling; Whole body PET

Indexed keywords

FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE F 18;

ADULT; AORTA; ARTICLE; BODY WEIGHT; CALIBRATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COLORECTAL CANCER; DUAL TIME POINT POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; GLUCOSE INTAKE; HUMAN; LIVER METASTASIS; MALE; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TISSUE REACTION;

EID: 84881257208     PISSN: None     EISSN: 2191219X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/2191-219X-3-16     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Patlak C, Blasberg R, Fenstermacher J: Graphical evaluation of blood-to-brain transfer constants frommultiple-time uptake data. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1983, 3:1-7.
2. Patlak C, Blasberg R: Graphical evaluation of blood-to-brain transfer constants frommultiple-time uptake data. Generalizations. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1985, 5(4):584-590.
3. Wahl R, Jacene H, Kasamon Y, Lodge M: From RECIST to PERCIST: evolving considerations for PET response criteria in solid tumors. J Nucl Med 2009, 50(Suppl 1):122S-150S.
4. Hamberg L, Hunter G, Alpert N, Choi N, Babich J, Fischman A: The dose uptake ratio as an index of glucose metabolism: useful parameter or oversimplification? J Nucl Med 1994, 35(8):1308.
5. Keyes J Jr: SUV: standard uptake or silly useless value? J Nucl Med 1995, 36(10):1836-1839.
6. Huang S: Anatomy of SUV. Nucl Med Biol 2000, 27(7):643-646.
7. Hustinx R, Smith R, Benard F, Rosenthal D, Machtay M, Farber L, Alavi A: Dual time point fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography: a potential method to differentiatemalignancy from inflammation and normal tissue in the head and neck. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 1999, 26(10):1345-1348.
8. Zhuang H, Pourdehnad M, Lambright E, Yamamoto A, Lanuti M, Li P, Mozley P, Rossman M, Albelda S, Alavi A: Dual time point 18F-FDG PET imaging for differentiatingmalignant from inflammatory processes. J Nucl Med 2001, 42(9):1412-1417.
9. Basu S, Alavi A: Partial volume correction of standardized uptake values and the dual time point in FDG-PET imaging: should these be routinely employed in assessing patients with cancer? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2007, 34(10):1527-1529.
10. Lin Y, Chen J, Ding H, Liang J, Yeh J, Kao C: Potential value of dual-time-point 18F-FDG PET compared with initial single-time-point imaging in differentiatingmalignant from benign pulmonary nodules: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nucl Med Commun 2012, 33(10):1011-1018.
11. Strauss L, Klippel S, Pan L, Schönleben K, Haberkorn U, Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A: Assessment of quantitative FDG PET data in primary colorectal tumours: which parameters are important with respect to tumour detection? Eur J Nucl MedMol Imaging 2007, 34(6):868-877.
12. Herzog H, Meyer P, Stoffels G, Floeth F, Coenen H, Langen K: Simplified analysis of FET-kinetics in brain tumors by voxel-by-voxel linear regression. J Nucl Med 2008, 49(Suppl 1):78P.
13. ROVER: ROVER: ROI visualization, evaluation and image registration. ABX Radeberg 2008. [http://www.abx.de/rover].
14. Hofheinz F, Pötzsch C, Oehme L, Beuthien-Baumann B, Steinbach J, Kotzerke J, van den Hoff J: Automatic volume delineation in oncological PET Evaluation of a dedicated software tool and comparison with manual delineation in clinical data sets. Nuklearmed 2012, 51:9-16.
15. R Development Core Team: R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2011. [http://www.R-project.org].
16. Hofheinz F, Langner J, Beuthien-Baumann B, Oehme L, Steinbach J, Kotzerke J, van den Hoff J: Suitability of bilateral filtering for edge-preserving noise reduction in PET. EJNMMI Res 2011, 1:1-9.
17. Freedman N, Sundaram S, Kurdziel K, Carrasquillo J, Whatley M, Carson J, Sellers D, Libutti S, Yang J, Bacharach S: Comparison of SUV and Patlak slope for monitoring of cancer therapy using serial PET scans. Eur J Nucl MedMol Imaging 2003, 30:46-53.
18. Buchert R, van den Hoff J, Mester J: Accurate determination of metabolic rates from dynamic positron emission tomography data with very-low temporal resolution. J Comput Assist Tomo 2003, 27(4):597-605.