Performance evaluation of a multi-image 3D reconstruction software on a low-feature artefact

Journal of Archaeological Science

Volumn 40, Issue 12, 2013, Pages 4450-4456

  Koutsoudis, Anestis ^a   Vidmar, Blaž ^b   Arnaoutoglou, Fotis ^a  

^a INSTITUTE FOR LANGUAGE AND SPEECH PROCESSING   (Greece)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LJUBLJANA   (Slovenia)

Author keywords

3D laser scanning; Data comparison; Dense multi view 3D reconstruction; Featureless object; Image based 3D reconstruction; Structure from Motion; Surface deviation

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTIFACT; DATA QUALITY; DATA SET; DIGITAL IMAGE; ERROR ANALYSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; RECONSTRUCTION; SOFTWARE; THREE-DIMENSIONAL MODELING;

EID: 84881253779     PISSN: 03054403     EISSN: 10959238     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2013.07.007     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Ahmadabadian A.H., Robson S., Boehma J., Shortisb M., Wenzelc K., Fritschc D. Acomparison of dense matching algorithms for scaled surface reconstruction using stereo camera rigs. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 2013, 78:157-167.
2. Bay H., Ess A., Tuytelaars T., Van Gool L. SURF: speeded up robust features. Computer Vision and Image Understanding 2008, 110:346-359.
3. Bercovitz J. Acomparison of camera base calculation methods. The ISU Journal: Stereoscopy 2005, (last accessed 01.07.13.). http://www.44bx.com/vic3d/bases.html.
4. Brutto M.L., Meli P. Computer vision tools for 3D modelling in archaeology. Proceeding of the International Conference on Cultural Heritage, Lemesos, Cyprus, October 29-3 November, 2012 2012, 1-6.
5. Dellaert F. Structure from motion without correspondence. Proceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, South Carolina, USA, June 13-15, 2000 2000, 557-564.
6. Doneus M., Verhoeven G., Fera M., Briese Ch., Kucera M., Neubauer W. From deposit to point cloud - a study of low-cost computer vision approaches for the straightforward documentation of archaeological excavations. Proceedings of 23rd International CIPA Symposium, Prague, Czech Republic, September 12-16, 2011 2011.
7. Doumas C. Early Cycladic Culture 2000, The N.P. Goulandris Collection, Athens.
8. Engels C., Stewénius H., Nistér D. Bundle adjustment rules. Proceedings of the Photogrammetric Computer Vision Conference, ISPRS, Bonn, Germany, September 20-22, 2006 2006.
9. Kersten T.P., Lindstaedt M. Image-based low cost systems for automatic 3D recording and modelling of archaeological finds and objects. Proceedings of Euromed 2012, Lemesos, Cyprus, October 29-November 3, 2012 2012, 1-10.
10. Koutsoudis A., Vidmar B., Ioannakis G., Arnaoutoglou F., Pavlidis G., Chamzas C. Multi-image 3D reconstruction data evaluation. Journal of Cultural Heritage 2012, (in press). Available online 17 January 2013. 10.1016/j.culher.2012.12.003.
11. Lowe D.G. Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. International Journal of Computer Vision 2000, 60:91-110.
12. Neitzel F., Klonowski J., Siebert S., Deshbach J.-P. Mobile 3D Mapping with a Low-cost UAV System on Example of a Landfill Survey 2011, vol. 10. Allgemeine Vermessungs-nachrichten AVN, Wichmann VDE-Verlag, Berlin - Offenbach.
13. Nguyen M.H., Wuensche B., Delmas P., Lutteroth C. 3D models from the black box: investigating the current state of image-based modelling. Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Computer Graphics, Visualisation and Computer Vision (WSCG 2012), Pilsen, Czech Republic, June 25-28, 2012 2012.
14. Opitz R., Simon K., Barnes A., Fisher K., Lippiello L. Close-range photogrammetry vs. 3D scanning: comparing data capture, processing and model generation in the field and the lab. Proceedings of the Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology (CAA) March 26-29, 2012, Avenue Campus, University of Southampton, England.
15. Remondino F., Del Pizzo S., Kersten P.T., Troisi S. Low-cost and open-source solutions for automated image orientation - a critical overview. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2012, 7616:40-54.
16. Renfrew C. Speculations on the use of Early Cycladic sculpture. Proceedings of the Seventh British Museum Classical Colloquium, June 1983 (London) 1984, 24-30. J.L. Fitton (Ed.).
17. Reu J.D., Plets G., Verhoeven G., Smedt P., Bats M., Cherrette B., Maeyer W., Deconynck J., Herremans D., Laloo P., Meirvenne M., Clercq W. Towards a three-dimensional cost-effective registration of the archaeological heritage. Journal of Archaeological Science 2012, 10.1016/j.jas.2012.08.040, 2012.
18. Snavely N., Seitz S.M., Szelinski R. Photo tourism: exploring image collections in 3D. Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 2006, Boston Massachusetts, July 30-August 3, USA, 2006 2006.
19. Snavely N. Bundler: Structure from Motion for Unordered Image Collections 2008, (last accessed 01.07.13.). http://phototour.cs.washington.edu/bundler/#S4.
20. (Web 1) PhotoSynth, Microsoft, , (last accessed 01.07.13.). http://photosynth.net.
21. (Web 2) 123D Catch, 2013. Autodesk, (last accessed 01.07.13.). http://www.123dapp.com/catch.
22. (Web 3) My 3D Scanner, (last accessed 01.07.13.). http://my3dscanner.com.
23. (Web 4) Cubify Capture, (last accessed 01.07.13.). http://www.cubify.com/products/capture.
24. (Web 5) Pix4UAV, (last accessed 01.07.13.). http://pix4d.com.
25. (Web 6) MicMac, (last accessed 01.07.13.). http://www.micmac.ign.fr.
26. (Web 7) PhotoModeller Scanner, (last accessed 01.07.13). http://www.photomodeler.com/products/scanner/default.html.
27. (Web 8) PhotoScan Agisoft LCC, (last accessed 01.07.13.). http://www.agisoft.ru/products/photoscan.
28. (Web 9) Meshlab, (last accessed 01.07.13.). http://meshlab.sourceforge.net.
29. (Web 10) CloudCompare, (last accessed 01.07.13). http://www.danielgm.net/cc.
30. Wu C., Agarwal S., Curless B., Seitz S.M. Multicore bundle adjustment. Proceedings of 24th Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, June 20-25, Colorado Springs, 2011 2011.
31. Wu C. VisualSFM: a Visual Structure from Motion System 2011, (last accessed 01.07.13.). http://www.cs.washington.edu/homes/ccwu/vsfm.