Behavioural foundations of two-fluid model for urban traffic

Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies

Volumn 35, Issue , 2013, Pages 115-126

  Dixit, Vinayak V ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

Driver behaviour; Two fluid model; Utility maximization

Indexed keywords

BOSE-EINSTEIN CONDENSATION; ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; STATISTICAL MECHANICS; TRAFFIC CONTROL; TRAFFIC SIGNALS; TRAVEL TIME;

ACTUATED SIGNALS; DRIVER BEHAVIOUR; GEOMETRIC FACTORS; PHYSICAL PHENOMENA; THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK; TRAFFIC FLOW MODELS; TWO FLUID MODEL; UTILITY MAXIMIZATIONS;

TWO PHASE FLOW;

FLOW MODELING; PERCEPTION; TRADE-OFF; TRAFFIC CONGESTION; TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT; TRAVEL TIME; TWO-DIMENSIONAL MODELING; URBAN TRANSPORT;

EID: 84881249548     PISSN: 0968090X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.trc.2013.06.009     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Ardekani, S.A., 1984. The Two-Fluid characterization of Urban Traffic: Theory Observation, and Experiment. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Teas at Austin, Texas.
2. Ardekani S.A., Williams J.C., Bhat S.C.S. Influence of urban network features on quality of traffic service. Transportation Research Record 1992, 1358:6-12.
3. Ayadh, M.T., 1986. Influence of the City Geometric Features on the Two Fluid Model Parameters. M.S. Thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia.
4. Banks, James H., Amin, Mohammad R., Cassidy, Michael, Chung, Koohong, 2003. Validation of Daganzo's Behavioral Theory of Multi-Lane Traffic Flow. California Partners for Advanced Transit and Highways (PATH), UC Berkley Final Report.
5. Bhat, S.C.S., Williams, J.C., Ardekani, S.A., 1992. Influence of Urban Network Features on Quality of Traffic Service. Final Project report to the Advance Research Program, Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, Grant No. 003656-109.
6. Chen D., Laval J.A., Ahn S., Zheng Z. Microscopic traffic hysteresis in traffic oscillations: a behavioral perspective. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 2012, 46(10):1440-1453.
7. Chen D., Laval J.A., Zheng Z., Ahn S. A behavioral car-following model that captures traffic oscillations. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 2012, 46(6):744-761.
8. Daganzo C.F. A behavioral theory of multi-lane traffic flow. Part I: Long homogeneous freeway sections. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 2002, 36(2):131-158.
9. Daganzo C.F. A behavioral theory of multi-lane traffic flow. Part II: Merges and the onset of congestion. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 2002, 36(2):159-169.
10. Del Castillo J.M., Benitez F.G. On the functional form of the speed-density relationship - I: General theory. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 1995, 29B(1995):373-389.
11. Del Castillo J.M., Benitez F.G. On the functional form of the speed-density relationship - II: Empirical investigation. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 1995, 29B(1995):391-406.
12. Dixit V.V., Pande A., Abdel-Aty M., Das A., Radwan E. Quality of traffic flow on urban arterial streets and its relationship with safety. Accident Analysis and Prevention 2011, 43(5):1610-1616.
13. Drake J., Schofer J., May A. A statistical analysis of speed-density hypotheses. Highway Research Record 1967, 156(1967):53-87.
14. Dreze J.M. Essays on Economic Decisions under Uncertainty 1987, Cambridge University Press.
15. Elvik, R., Christensen, P., Amundsen, A., 2004. Speed and Road Accidents-An Evaluation of the Power Model. Institute of Transportation Economics. TOI Report, 740/2004, Oslo.
16. Evans W.N., Graham J.D. Risk reduction or risk compensation? The case of mandatory safety-belt use laws. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 1991, 4(1):61-73.
17. FHWA, 2008. Surrogate Safety Assessment Model and Validation: Final Report. Publication No. FHWA-HRT-08-051. (accessed 10.08.11). http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/safety/08051/08051.pdf.
18. Fuller R. Towards a general theory of driver behaviour. Accident Analysis and Prevention 2005, 37:461-472.
19. Greenberg H. An analysis of traffic flow. Operation Research 1959, 7(1959):79-85.
20. Greenshields B.D. A study in highway capacity. Highway Research Board Proceedings 1935, 14(1935):448-477.
21. Hamdar, S.H., Treiber, M., Mahmassani, H.S., Kesting, A., 2008. Modeling Driver Behavior as a Sequential Risk Taking Task. Transportation Research Record, No. 2088, pp. 208-217.
22. Herman R., Malakhoff A.L., Ardekani S.A. Trip time-stop time studies of extreme driver behaviors. Transportation Research Part A 1988, 22A(6):427-433.
23. Jones E.G., Farhat W. Validation of two-fluid model of urban traffic for arterial streets. Transportation Research Record 2004, 1876:132-141.
24. Karni, E., 2005. State-Dependent Preferences. <> (accessed 10.08.11). http://www.econ.jhu.edu/people/Karni/sdp1.pdf.
25. Mahmassani, H., Williams, J.C., Herman, R., 1984. Investigation of Network-Level Traffic Flow Relationships: Some Simulation Results. Transportation Research Record 971, Transportation Research Board.
26. Mahmassani H., Williams J.C., Herman R. Performance of urban traffic networks. Transportation and Traffic Theory (Proceedings of the Tenth International Symposium on Transportation and Traffic Theory, Cambridge Massachusetts) 1987, Elsevier. N.H. Gartner, N.H.M. Wilson (Eds.).
27. Mahmassani H.J., Jayakrishnan R., Herman R. Network traffic flow theory: microscopic simulation experiments on supercomputers. Transportation Research Part A 1990, 24A(2):149-162.
28. Parkin J.M., Wu S.Y. Choice involving unwanted risky events and optimal insurance. American Economic Review 1972, 62:982-987.
29. Prigogine I., Herman R. Kinetic Theory of Vehicular Traffic 1971, American Elsevier, New York.
30. Rumar K. The role of perceptual and cognitive filters in observed behavior. Human Behavior and Traffic Safety 1985, Plenum, London. L. Evans', R.C. Schwing (Eds.).
31. Savage L.J. The Foundations of Statistics 1954, Wiley, New York, (1972, second ed., Dover, New York).
32. Tarko A.P. Modeling driver's speed selection as a trade-off behavior. Accident Analysis and Prevention 2009, 41:608-616.
33. Transportation Research Board, 1998. Managing Speed: A Review of Current Practice for Setting and Enforcing Speed Limits. Special Report 254. Transportation Research Board, National Academy of Science, Washington, DC.
34. European Commission, 1999. MASTER: Managing speeds of traffic on European roads. Final Report. European Commission, Brussels.
35. Vo P.T., Mattingly S.P., Ardekani S., Dilshad Y. Comparison of quality of service in two central business districts: two-fluid model approach in Texas. Transportation Research Record 2007, 1999:180-188.
36. Wang H., Li J., Chen Q.Y., Ni D. Logistic modeling of the equilibrium speed-density relationship. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 2011, 45(6):554-566.
37. Wickens C.D., Hollands J.G. Engineering Psychology and Human Performance 2000, Prentice Hall, New Jersey. third ed.