Magazine approach during a signal for food depends on pavlovian, not instrumental, conditioning

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes

Volumn 39, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 107-116

  Harris, Justin A ^a   Andrew, Benjamin J ^a   Kwok, Dorothy W S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Classical conditioning; Feature negative; Feature positive; Omission schedule; Operant

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMAL; APPETITE; ARTICLE; CONDITIONED REFLEX; FOOD; INSTRUMENTAL CONDITIONING; LEARNING; MALE; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PHYSIOLOGY; RAT; REINFORCEMENT; WISTAR RAT;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; APPETITIVE BEHAVIOR; ASSOCIATION LEARNING; CONDITIONING, CLASSICAL; CONDITIONING, OPERANT; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); FOOD; MALE; RATS; RATS, WISTAR; REINFORCEMENT (PSYCHOLOGY); REINFORCEMENT SCHEDULE;

EID: 84881228227     PISSN: 00977403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0031315     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Boakes, R. A. (1977). Performance on learning to associate a stimulus with positive reinforcement. In H. Davis & H. M. B. Hurwitz (Eds.), Operant-Pavlovian interactions (pp. 67-97). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. Church, R. M. (1964). Systematic effect of random error in the yoked control design. Psychological Bulletin, 62, 122-131. doi:10.1037/h0042733
3. Davison, M., & McCarthy, D. (1988). The matching law: A research review. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Delamater, A. R. (1996). Effects of several extinction treatments upon the integrity of Pavlovian stimulus-outcome associations. Animal Learning & Behavior, 24, 437-449. doi:10.3758/BF03199015
5. Farwell, B. J., & Ayres, J. J. (1979). Stimulus-reinforcer and response-reinforcer relations in the control of conditioned appetitive headpoking (goal tracking) in rats. Learning and Motivation, 10, 295-312. doi: 10.1016/0023-9690(79)90035-3
6. Gallistel, C. R., & Gibbon, J. (2000). Time, rate, and conditioning. Psychological Review, 107, 289-344. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.107.2.289
7. Gormezano, I., & Kehoe, E. J. (1975). Classical conditioning: Some methodological-conceptual issues. In W. K. Estes (Ed.), Handbook of learning and cognitive processes (pp. 143-179; Vol. 2). Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum.
8. Harris, J. A., & Carpenter, J. S. (2011). Response rate and reinforcement rate in Pavlovian conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 37, 375-384. doi:10.1037/a0024554
9. Herrnstein, R. J. (1970). On the law of effect. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 13, 243-266. doi:10.1901/jeab.1970.13-243
10. Holland, P. C. (1979). Differential effects of omission contingencies on various components of Pavlovian appetitive conditioned responding in rats. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 5, 178-193. doi:10.1037/0097-7403.5.2.178
11. Holland, P. C. (1991). Transfer of control in ambiguous discriminations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 17(3), 231-248. doi:10.1037/0097-7403.17.3.231
12. Jenkins, H. M. (1977). Sensitivity of different response systems to stimulus-reinforcer and response-reinforcer relations. In H. Davis & H. M. B. Hurwitz (Eds.), Operant-Pavlovian interactions (pp. 47-66). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
13. Lattal, K. M., & Nakajima, S. (1998). Overexpectation in appetitive Pav-lovian and instrumental conditioning. Animal Learning & Behavior, 26, 351-360. doi:10.3758/BF03199227
14. Luce, R. D. (1977). The choice axiom after twenty years. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15, 215-233. doi:10.1016/0022-2496(77)90032-3
15. Reberg, D., & Leclerc, R. (1977). A feature positive effect in conditioned suppression. Animal Learning & Behavior, 5, 143-147. doi:10.3758/BF03214069
16. Rescorla, R. A. (2000). Extinction can be enhanced by a concurrent excitor. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 26, 251-260. doi:10.1037/0097-7403.26.3.251
17. Rescorla, R. A., & Wagner, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonrein-forcement. In A. H. Black & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory (pp. 64-99). New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
18. Ricker, S. T., & Bouton, M. E. (1996). Reacquisition following extinction in appetitive conditioning. Animal Learning & Behavior, 24, 423-436. doi:10.3758/BF03199014
19. Sainsbury, R. S., & Jenkins, H. M. (1967). Feature-positive effect in discrimination learning. Proceedings of the Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, 2, 17-18.
20. Sheffield, F. D. (1965). Relation between classical conditioning and instrumental learning. In W. F. Prokasy (Ed.), Classical conditioning (pp. 302-322). New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
21. Wagner, A. R. (1981). SOP: A model of automatic memory processing in animal behavior. In N. E. Spear & R. R. Miller (Eds.), Information processing in animals: Memory mechanisms (pp. 5-47). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
22. Williams, D. R., & Williams, H. (1969). Auto-maintenance in the pigeon: Sustained pecking despite contingent non-reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 12, 511-520. doi:10.1901/jeab.1969 .12-511