Leaving the third dimension: No measurable evidence for cognitive aftereffects of stereoscopic 3D movies

Journal of the Society for Information Display

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 159-166

  Bombeke, Klaas ^a,c   Van Looy, Jan ^a   Szmalec, Arnaud ^b   Duyck, Wouter ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITÉ CATHOLIQUE DE LOUVAIN   (Belgium)

^c Research Group Media   (Belgium)

Author keywords

aftereffects; change detection; mental rotation; spatial cognition; stereoscopic 3D; visual cognition; visually directed walking task

Indexed keywords

AFTEREFFECTS; CHANGE DETECTION; MENTAL ROTATION; SPATIAL COGNITION; STEREOSCOPIC 3D; VISUAL COGNITION; WALKING TASKS;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; EXPERIMENTS; LAWS AND LEGISLATION; MOTION PICTURES;

THREE DIMENSIONAL;

EID: 84881227905     PISSN: 10710922     EISSN: 19383657     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jsid.164     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. " User Manual Samsung UN55C7000 55" 1080p 3D LED HDTV." Samsung, Daegu, p. 19.
2. M. R. Leary, " Introduction to Behavioral Research Methods: International Edition." Pearson Education, Limited Harlow, UK (2011).
3. R. Patterson, " Human factors of 3-D displays," J. Soc. Inf. Display 15, 861-871 (2007).
4. E. Kronholm, et al,., " Self-reported sleep duration and cognitive functioning in the general population," J. Sleep Res. 18, No. 4, 436-46 (2009).
5. W. J. Tam, et al,., " Stereoscopic 3D-TV: Visual Comfort," IEEE Trans. Broadcast. 57, No. 99, 1-1 (2011).
6. S. Yano, et al,., " A study of visual fatigue and visual comfort for 3D HDTV/HDTV images," Displays 23, No. 4, 191-201 (2002).
7. S. Yano, et al,., " Two factors in visual fatigue caused by stereoscopic HDTV images," Displays 25, No. 4, 141-150 (2004).
8. M. Emoto, et al,., " Changes in fusional vergence limit and its hysteresis after viewing stereoscopic TV," Displays 25 (2-3), 67-76 (2004).
9. T. Inoue, and, H. Ohzu, " Accommodative responses to stereoscopic three-dimensional display," Appl. Opt. 36, No. 19, 4509-15 (1997).
10. M. T. Banich, " Cognitive neuroscience and neuropsychology," Houghton Mifflin Co. Orlando, FL (2004).
11. F. Biocca, " The cyborg's dilemma: embodiment in virtual environments," Proceedings, Second International Conference on Cognitive Technology: Humanizing the Information Age, 12-26 (1997).
12. K. Stanney, and, G. Salvendy, " Aftereffects and sense of presence in virtual environments: formulation of a research and development agenda," Int. J. Hum-Comput. Int. 10, No. 2, 135-187 (1998).
13. K. Behr, et al,., " Some practical considerations of ethical issues in VR research," Presence: Teleop. Virtual Environ. 14, No. 6, 668-677 (2005).
14. R. N. Shepard, and, J. Metzler, " Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects," Science 171, No. 3972, 701 (1971).
15. I. Spence, and, J. Feng, " Video games and spatial cognition," Rev. Gen. Psychol. 14, No. 2, 92-104 (2010).
16. D. Stransky, et al,., " Mental rotation: cross-task training and generalization," J. Exp. Psychol. Appl. 16, No. 4, 349-60 (2010).
17. J. M. Loomis, et al,., " Visual space perception and visually directed action," J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 18, No. 4, 906-21, (1992).
18. J. W. Philbeck, " Visually directed walking to briefly glimpsed targets is not biased toward fixation location," Perception 29, No. 3, 259-272 (2000).
19. B. J. Mohler, et al,., " The influence of feedback on egocentric distance judgments in real and virtual environments," in Proceedings of the 3rd Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization, 1, No. 212, (2006), pp. 9-14.
20. S. J. Luck, and, E. K. Vogel, " The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions," Nature 390, No. 6657, 279-81 (1997).
21. R. L. Solomon, " An extension of control group design," Psychol. Bull. 46, 137-150 (1949).
22. M. Braver, and, S. L. Braver, " Statistical treatment of the Solomon four-group design: A meta-analytic approach," Psychol. Bull. 104, No. 1, 150 (1988).
23. S. G. Vandenberg, and, A. R. Kuse, " Mental rotations, a group test of three-dimensional spatial visualization," Percept. Mot. Skills 47, 599-604 (1978).
24. A. Basso, and, F. Burgio, " Semantic category and initial letter word fluency in left-brain-damaged patients," Eur. J. Neurol. 544-550 (1997).
25. S. Yang, et al,., " Individual differences and seating position affect immersion and symptoms in stereoscopic 3D viewing," Optom. Vis. Sci. 89, No. 7, (2012), 1-44.
26. M. Heil, et al,., " What is improved if a mental rotation task is repeated-the efficiency of memory access, or the speed of a transformation routine? " Psychol. Res. 61, No. 2, 99-106 (1998).
27. M. Peters, et al,., " A redrawn Vandenberg and Kuse mental rotations test: different versions and factors that affect performance," Brain Cogn. 28, No. 1, 39-58 (1995).
28. A. Treisman, " A feature-integration theory of attention," Cogn. Psychol. 136, 97-136 (1980).
29. L. K. Miller, " Developmental differences in the field of view during covert and overt search," Child Dev. 44, No. 2, 247-52 (1973).
30. J. Lessiter, et al,., " A cross-media presence questionnaire: the ITC-sense of presence inventory," Presence: Teleop. Virtual Environ. 10, No. 3, 282-297 (2001).