Concordance between self-report and a survey-based algorithm for classification of type 1 and type 2 diabetes using the 2011 population-based survey on living with chronic diseases in canada (slcdc)-diabetes component

Canadian Journal of Diabetes

Volumn 37, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 249-253

  Ng, Edward ^a   Vanderloo, Saskia E ^b   Geiss, Linda ^c   Johnson, Jeffrey A ^d  

^a STATISTICS CANADA   (Canada)

^b OTTAWA HOSPITAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

^c NATIONAL CENTER FOR CHRONIC DISEASE PREVENTION AND HEALTH PROMOTION   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Surveillance; Survey; Type 1 diabetes; Type 2 diabetes

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; AGING; ARTICLE; CANADA; CLASSIFICATION ALGORITHM; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NON INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; PREDICTIVE VALUE; SELF REPORT; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; ALGORITHM; CHRONIC DISEASE; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 1; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MIDDLE AGED; PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY; STANDARDS; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; AGED; ALGORITHMS; CANADA; CHRONIC DISEASE; DATA COLLECTION; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 1; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PUBLIC HEALTH SURVEILLANCE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SELF REPORT; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84881227341     PISSN: 14992671     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2013.05.007     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Statistics Canada. 2008. Leading causes of deaths in Canada, CANSIM Table102-0561. accessed July 5, 2013. http://www.statcan.gc.ca/tables-tableaux/sum-som/l01/cst01/hlth36a-eng.htm.
2. Statistics Canada. 2011. Diabetes, by sex, provinces and territories, CANSIMTable105-0501. accessed July 5, 2013. http://www5.statcan.gc.ca/cansim/a05?lang=eng&id=1050501.
3. Hux J.E., Ivis F., Flintoft V., et al. Diabetes in Ontario: determination of prevalence and incidence using a validated administrative data algorithm. Diabetes Care 2002, 25:512-516.
4. Public Health Agency of Canada. 2011. Diabetes in Canada: facts and figures from a public health perspective. Ottawa. accessed July 5, 2013. http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/cd-mc/publications/diabetes-diabete/facts-figures-faits-chiffres-2011/.
5. Guttmann A., Nakhla M., Henderson M., et al. Validation of a health administrative data algorithm for assessing the epidemiology of diabetes in Canadian children. Pediatr Diabetes 2010, 11:122-128.
6. Statistics Canada. 2012. Canadian Community Health Survey-Annual Component (CCHS). Accessed February 22, 2012. http://www.statcan.gc.ca/cgi-bin/imdb/p2SV.pl%3fFunction%3dgetSurvey%26SDDS%3d3226%26lang%3den%26db%3dimdb%26adm%3d8%26dis%3d2.
7. Ng E., Dasgupta K., Johnson J. An algorithm to differentiate diabetic respondents in the Canadian Community Health Survey. Health Rep 2008, 19:71-79.
8. Statistics Canada. 2009. Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS)-cycle 1.1. Accessed February 22, 2012. http://www.statcan.gc.ca/concepts/health-sante/index-eng.htm.
9. Maddigan S.L., Feeny D.H., Majumdar S.R., et al. Understanding the determinants of health for people with type 2 diabetes. Am J Public Health 2006, 96:1649-1655.
10. Statistics Canada. 2011. Survey on living with chronic diseases in Canada-user guide. Accessed February 5, 2012. http://www.statcan.gc.ca/imdb-bmdi/document/5160_D4_T1_V2-eng.pdf.
11. Statistics Canada. 2011. Survey on Living with Chronic Diseases in Canada (SLCDC)-diabetes component (questionnaire). Accessed: May 13, 2012. http://www23.statcan.gc.ca:81/imdb-bmdi/instrument/5160_Q5_V1-eng.pdf.
12. Landis J.R., Koch G.G. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977, 33:159-174.
13. Dabelea D., Pihoker C., Talton J.W., et al. Etiological approach to characterization of diabetes type: the SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth Study. Diabetes Care 2011, 34:1628-1633.
14. Vanderloo S.E., Johnson J.A., Reimer K., et al. Validation of classification algorithms for childhood diabetes identified from administrative data. Pediatr Diabetes 2012, 13:229-234.
15. Robinson J.R., Young T.K., Roos L.L., et al. Estimating the burden of disease. Comparing administrative data and self-reports. Med Care 1997, 35:932-947.
16. Sharp L.M., Frankel J. Respondent burden: a test of some common assumptions. Public Opin Q 1983, 47:36-53.
17. Skinner K.M., Miller D.R., Lincoln E., et al. Concordance between respondent self-reports and medical records for chronic conditions: experience from the Veterans Health Study. JAmbul Care Manage 2005, 28:102-110.
18. Okura Y., Urban L.H., Mahoney D.W., et al. Agreement between self-report questionnaires and medical record data was substantial for diabetes, hypertension, myocardial infarction and stroke but not for heart failure. JClin Epidemiol 2004, 57:1096-1103.
19. Statistics Canada. Survey on Living with Chronic Diseases in Canada (SLCDC)-detailed information for 2011 (diabetes and respiratory conditions) (2011). Accessed February 20, 2012. http://www.statcan.gc.ca/cgi-bin/imdb/p2SV.pl%3fFunction%3dgetSurvey%26SDDS%3d5160%26lang%3den%26db%3dimdb%26adm%3d8%26dis%3d2.
20. Clottey C., Mo F., LeBrun B., et al. The development of the National Diabetes Surveillance System (NDSS) in Canada. Chronic Dis Can 2001, 22:67-69.