Diagnostic utility of a novel leadless arrhythmia monitoring device

American Journal of Cardiology

Volumn 112, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 520-524

  Turakhia, Mintu P ^a,b   Hoang, Donald D ^a   Zimetbaum, Peter ^c   Miller, Jared D ^a,b   Froelicher, Victor F ^a,b   Kumar, Uday N ^d   Xu, Xiangyan ^a   Yang, Felix ^a   Heidenreich, Paul A ^a,b  

^a VA PALO ALTO HEALTH CARE SYSTEM   (United States)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^d iRhythm Technologies Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AMBULATORY MONITORING; ARTICLE; CARDIOVASCULAR MONITORING DEVICE; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY MONITORING; FEMALE; HEART ARRHYTHMIA; HEART ATRIUM FIBRILLATION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ARRHYTHMIAS, CARDIAC; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY, AMBULATORY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84881191036     PISSN: 00029149     EISSN: 18791913     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.04.017     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. M.H. Crawford, S.J. Bernstein, P.C. Deedwania, J.P. DiMarco, K.J. Ferrick, A. Garson Jr., L.A. Green, H.L. Greene, M.J. Silka, P.H. Stone, C.M. Tracy, R.J. Gibbons, J.S. Alpert, K.A. Eagle, T.J. Gardner, G. Gregoratos, R.O. Russell, T.H. Ryan, and S.C. Smith Jr. ACC/AHA guidelines for ambulatory electrocardiography: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Revise the Guidelines for Ambulatory Electrocardiography). Developed in collaboration with the North American Society for Pacing and Electrophysiology J Am Coll Cardiol 34 1999 912 948
2. P.J. Zimetbaum, and M.E. Josephson The evolving role of ambulatory arrhythmia monitoring in general clinical practice Ann Intern Med 130 1999 848 856
3. P. Zimetbaum, and A. Goldman Ambulatory arrhythmia monitoring: choosing the right device Circulation 122 2010 1629 1636
4. S. Mittal, C. Movsowitz, and J.S. Steinberg Ambulatory external electrocardiographic monitoring: focus on atrial fibrillation J Am Coll Cardiol 58 2011 1741 1749
5. L. Roten, M. Schilling, A. Haberlin, J. Seiler, N.G. Schwick, J. Fuhrer, E. Delacretaz, and H. Tanner Is 7-day event triggered ECG recording equivalent to 7-day Holter ECG recording for atrial fibrillation screening? Heart 98 2012 645 649
6. S. Sivakumaran, A.D. Krahn, G.J. Klein, J. Finan, R. Yee, S. Renner, and A.C. Skanes A prospective randomized comparison of loop recorders versus Holter monitors in patients with syncope or presyncope Am J Med 115 2003 1 5
7. S. Kinlay, J.W. Leitch, A. Neil, B.L. Chapman, D.B. Hardy, and P.J. Fletcher Cardiac event recorders yield more diagnoses and are more cost-effective than 48-hour Holter monitoring in patients with palpitations: a controlled clinical trial Ann Intern Med 124 1996 16 20
8. R.I. Fogel, J.J. Evans, and E.N. Prystowsky Utility and cost of event recorders in the diagnosis of palpitations, presyncope, and syncope Am J Cardiol 79 1997 207 208
9. J.A. Reiffel, R. Schwarzberg, and M. Murry Comparison of autotriggered memory loop recorders versus standard loop recorders versus 24-hour Holter monitors for arrhythmia detection Am J Cardiol 95 2005 1055 1059
10. M.A. Rosenberg, M. Samuel, A. Thosani, and P.J. Zimetbaum Use of a noninvasive continuous monitoring device in the management of atrial fibrillation: a pilot study Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 36 2013 328 333
11. P.A. Ackermans, T.A. Solosko, E.C. Spencer, S.E. Gehman, K. Nammi, J. Engel, and J.K. Russell A user-friendly integrated monitor-adhesive patch for long-term ambulatory electrocardiogram monitoring J Electrocardiol 45 2012 148 153
12. S.A. Rothman, J.C. Laughlin, J. Seltzer, J.S. Walia, R.I. Baman, S.Y. Siouffi, R.M. Sangrigoli, and P.R. Kowey The diagnosis of cardiac arrhythmias: a prospective multi-center randomized study comparing mobile cardiac outpatient telemetry versus standard loop event monitoring J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 18 2007 241 247
13. C.R. Vasamreddy, D. Dalal, J. Dong, A. Cheng, D. Spragg, S.Z. Lamiy, G. Meininger, C.A. Henrikson, J.E. Marine, R. Berger, and H. Calkins Symptomatic and asymptomatic atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing radiofrequency catheter ablation J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 17 2006 134 139
14. T. Hanke, E.I. Charitos, U. Stierle, A. Karluss, E. Kraatz, B. Graf, A. Hagemann, M. Misfeld, and H.H. Sievers Twenty-four-hour Holter monitor follow-up does not provide accurate heart rhythm status after surgical atrial fibrillation ablation therapy: up to 12 months experience with a novel permanently implantable heart rhythm monitor device Circulation 120 2009 S177 S184
15. E.I. Charitos, U. Stierle, P.D. Ziegler, M. Baldewig, D.R. Robinson, H.H. Sievers, and T. Hanke A comprehensive evaluation of rhythm monitoring strategies for the detection of atrial fibrillation recurrence: insights from 647 continuously monitored patients and implications for monitoring after therapeutic interventions Circulation 126 2012 806 814