![]() |
Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 633-637
|
Systematic reviews showed insufficient evidence for clinical practice in 2004: What about in 2011? the next appeal for the evidence-based medicine age
|
Author keywords
clinical medicine; clinical trials; Cochrane reviews; evidence based medicine; limitations; meta analysis; research; review literature
|
Indexed keywords
CLINICAL PRACTICE;
COCHRANE LIBRARY;
CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY;
EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE;
HUMAN;
META ANALYSIS;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
REVIEW;
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;
CLINICAL MEDICINE;
CLINICAL TRIALS;
COCHRANE REVIEWS;
EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE;
LIMITATIONS;
META-ANALYSIS;
RESEARCH;
REVIEW LITERATURE;
CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES;
EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE;
HUMANS;
RANDOM ALLOCATION;
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC;
REVIEW LITERATURE AS TOPIC;
|
EID: 84881150396
PISSN: 13561294
EISSN: 13652753
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01877.x Document Type: Review |
Times cited : (22)
|
References (7)
|