Utilization and success rates of unstimulated in vitro fertilization in the United States: An analysis of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology database

Fertility and Sterility

Volumn 100, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 392-395

  Gordon, John David ^a   Dimattina, Michael ^a   Reh, Andrea ^a   Botes, Awie ^a   Celia, Gerard ^a   Payson, Mark ^a  

^a Dominion   (United States)

Author keywords

IVF; Natural cycle IVF; unstimulated IVF

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; HUMAN; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PREGNANCY RATE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; UNITED STATES; UNSTIMULATED IN VITRO FERTILIZATION;

IVF; NATURAL CYCLE IVF; UNSTIMULATED IVF;

ADULT; DATABASES, FACTUAL; EMBRYO IMPLANTATION; EMBRYO TRANSFER; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; HUMANS; MATERNAL AGE; OVULATION INDUCTION; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY RATE; REPRODUCTIVE TECHNIQUES, ASSISTED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SOCIETIES, MEDICAL; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84881130826     PISSN: 00150282     EISSN: 15565653     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.03.037     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. T. Matsuura, Y. Takehara, H. Kaijima, S. Teramoto, and O. Kato Natural IVF cycles may be desirable for women with repeated failures by stimulated IVF cycles J Assist Reprod Genet 25 2008 163 167
2. S.J. Phillips, I.J. Kadoch, L. Lapensée, B. Couturier, R. Hemmings, and F. Bissonnette Controlled natural cycle IVF: experience in a world of stimulation Reprod Biomed Online 14 2007 356 359
3. A. Aanesen, K.G. Nygren, and L. Nylund Modified natural cycle IVF and mild IVF: a 10 year Swedish experience Reprod Biomed Online 20 2010 156 162
4. M. Schimberni, F. Morgia, J. Colabianchi, A. Giallonardo, C. Piscitelli, and P. Giannini Natural-cycle in vitro fertilization in poor responder patients: a survey of 500 consecutive cycles Fertil Steril 92 2009 1297 1301
5. K.M. Trokoudes, M.B. Minbattiwalla, L. Kalogirou, K. Pantelides, P. Mitsingas, and A. Sokratous Controlled natural cycle IVF with antagonist use and blastocyst transfer Reprod Biomed Online 11 2005 685 689
6. B.C. Heng Reluctance of medical professionals in adopting natural-cycle and minimal ovarian stimulation protocols in human clinical assisted reproduction Reprod Biomed Online 15 2007 9 11
7. E. Flisser, R. Scott, and A. Copperman Patient-friendly IVF: how should it be defined? Fertil Steril 88 2007 547 549
8. J.D. Gordon, M. Dimattina, A. Botes, and G. Celia Opinions regarding unstimulated IVF: a survey of clinics reporting to SART Fertil Steril 94 2010 S158
9. E.N. Pistorius, E.M. Adang, P.F. Stalmeier, D.D. Braat, and J.A. Kemer Prospective patient and physician preferences for stimulation or no stimulation in IVF Hum Fertil (Camb) 9 2006 209 216
10. G. Nargund, J. Waterstone, J. Bland, Z. Philips, J. Parsons, and S. Campbell Cumulative conception and live birth rates in natural (unstimulated) IVF cycles Hum Reprod 16 2001 259 262
11. M.J. Pelinck, H.M. Knol, N.E. Vogel, E.G. Arts, A.H. Simons, and M.J. Heineman Cumulative pregnancy rates after sequential treatment with modified natural cycle IVF followed by IVF with controlled ovarian stimulation Human Reprod 23 2008 1808 1814
12. M.J. Pelinck, N.E. Vogel, E.G. Arts, A.H. Simons, M.J. Heineman, and A. Hoek Cumulative pregnancy rates after a maximum of nine cycles of modified natural cycle IVF and analysis of patient drop-out: a cohort study Human Reprod 22 2007 2463 2470
13. A. Hojgaard, H.J. Ingerslev, and J. Dinesen Friendly IVF: patient opinions Hum Reprod 16 2001 1391 1396
14. B.S. Shapiro, S.T. Daneshmand, F.C. Garner, M. Aguirre, C. Hudson, and S. Thomas Evidence of impaired endometrial receptivity after ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: a prospective randomized trial comparing fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfer in normal responders Fertil Steril 96 2011 344 348