Critical appraisal tools for assessing the methodological quality of qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods studies included in systematic mixed studies reviews

Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 722-

  Pluye, Pierre ^a  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL PRACTICE; EMPIRICISM; EVALUATION; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HUMAN; LETTER; METHODOLOGY; MIXED METHODS APPRAISAL TOOL; NAMED INVENTORIES, QUESTIONNAIRES AND RATING SCALES; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; QUANTITATIVE STUDY; RELIABILITY; STUDY DESIGN; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW (TOPIC); VALIDATION PROCESS; WORKSHOP;

BENCHMARKING; EVALUATION STUDIES AS TOPIC; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; RESEARCH DESIGN;

EID: 84881122584     PISSN: 13561294     EISSN: 13652753     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/jep.12017     Document Type: Letter

References (4)

1. Sirriyeh, R., Lawton, R., Gardner, P., &, Armitage, G., (2012) Reviewing studies with diverse designs: the development and evaluation of a new tool. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 18 (4), 746-752.
2. Pluye, P., Robert, E., Cargo, M., Bartlett, G., O'Cathain, A., Griffiths, F., Boardman, F., Gagnon, M. P., &, Rousseau, M. C., (2011) Proposal: a mixed methods appraisal tool for systematic mixed studies reviews. Available at: http://mixedmethodsappraisaltoolpublic.pbworks.com. (last accessed 10 November 2012).
3. Pluye, P., Gagnon, M. P., Griffiths, F., &, Johnson-Lafleur, J., (2009) A scoring system for appraising mixed methods research, and concomitantly appraising qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods primary studies in mixed studies reviews. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 46 (4), 529-546.
4. Pace, R., Pluye, P., Bartlett, G., Macaulay, A. C., Salsberg, J., Jagosh, J., &, Seller, R., (2011) Testing the reliability and efficiency of the pilot Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) for systematic mixed studies review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 49 (1), 47-53.