Concurrent repetition enhancement and suppression responses in extrastriate visual cortex

Cerebral Cortex

Volumn 23, Issue 9, 2013, Pages 2235-2244

  De Gardelle, Vincent ^a,b   Waszczuk, Monika ^a   Egner, Tobias ^c   Summerfield, Christopher ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DESCARTES   (France)

^c DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

face perception; fMRI; predictive coding; repetition enhancement; repetition suppression

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AMYGDALOID NUCLEUS; ARTICLE; BOLD SIGNAL; ECHO PLANAR IMAGING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EXTRASTRIATE BODY AREA; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; FUNCTIONAL NEUROIMAGING; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MIDDLE FRONTAL GYRUS; NERVE POTENTIAL; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTION; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPETITION ENHANCEMENT; REPETITION SUPPRESSION; SIMULATION; VISION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

FACE PERCEPTION; FMRI; PREDICTIVE CODING; REPETITION ENHANCEMENT; REPETITION SUPPRESSION;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BRAIN; FACE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; VISUAL CORTEX; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84881122554     PISSN: 10473211     EISSN: 14602199     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhs211     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Alink A, Schwiedrzik CM, Kohler A, Singer W, Muckli L. 2010. Stimulus predictability reduces responses in primary visual cortex. J Neurosci. 30:2960-2966.
2. Allman J, Miezin F, McGuinness E. 1985. Stimulus specific responses from beyond the classical receptive field: neurophysiological mechanisms for local-global comparisons in visual neurons. Annu Rev Neurosci. 8:407-430.
3. Angelucci A, Bullier J. 2003. Reaching beyond the classical receptive field of V1 neurons: horizontal or feedback axons? J Physiol Paris. 97:141-154.
4. Bar M. 2004. Visual objects in context. Nat Rev Neurosci. 5:617-629.
5. Deco G, Rolls ET. 2005. Attention, short-term memory, and action selection: a unifying theory. Prog Neurobiol. 76:236-256.
6. Dehaene S, Naccache L, Cohen L, Bihan DL, Mangin JF, Poline JB, Riviere D. 2001. Cerebral mechanisms of word masking and unconscious repetition priming. Nature Neurosci. 4:752-758.
7. den Ouden HEM, Friston KJ, Daw ND, McIntosh AR, Stephan KE. 2009. A dual role for prediction error in associative learning. Cereb Cortex. 19:1175-1185.
8. Egner T, Monti JM, Summerfield C. 2010. Expectation and surprise determine neural population responses in the ventral visual stream. J Neurosci. 30:16601-16608.
9. Friston K. 2005. A theory of cortical responses. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 360:815-836.
10. Gilbert CD, Sigman M. 2007. Brain states: top-down influences in sensory processing. Neuron. 54:677-696.
11. Grill-Spector K, Henson R, Martin A. 2006. Repetition and the brain: neural models of stimulus-specific effects. Trends Cogn Sci. 10:14-23.
12. Henson R, Shallice T, Dolan R. 2000. Neuroimaging evidence for dissociable forms of repetition priming. Science. 287:1269-1272.
13. Henson RN, Shallice T, Gorno-Tempini ML, Dolan RJ. 2002. Face repetition effects in implicit and explicit memory tests as measured by fMRI. Cereb Cortex. 12:178-186.
14. Hubel DH, Wiesel TN. 1959. Receptive fields of single neurones in the cat's striate cortex. J Physiol. 148:574-591.
15. Kouider S, de Gardelle V, Dehaene S, Dupoux E, Pallier C. 2010. Cerebral bases of subliminal speech priming. Neuroimage. 49:922-929.
16. Kouider S, Eger E, Dolan R, Henson RN. 2009. Activity in face-responsive brain regions is modulated by invisible, attended faces: evidence from masked priming. Cereb Cortex. 19:13-23.
17. Kovacs G, Iffland L, Vidnyanszky Z, Greenlee MW. 2012. Stimulus repetition probability effects on repetition suppression are position invariant for faces. Neuroimage. 60:2128-2135.
18. Kriegeskorte N, Formisano E, Sorger B, Goebel R. 2007. Individual faces elicit distinct response patterns in human anterior temporal cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 104:20600-20605.
19. Meyer T, Olson CR. 2011. Statistical learning of visual transitions in monkey inferotemporal cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 108:19401-19406.
20. Muller NG, Strumpf H, Scholz M, Baier B, Melloni L. 2012. Repetition suppression versus enhancement-it's quantity that matters. Cereb Cortex. In press.
21. Mumford D. 1992. On the computational architecture of the neocortex. II. The role of cortico-cortical loops. Biol Cybern. 66:241-251.
22. Murray SO, Kersten D, Olshausen BA, Schrater P, Woods DL. 2002. Shape perception reduces activity in human primary visual cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 99:15164-15169.
23. Naccache L, Dehaene S. 2001. The priming method: imaging unconscious repetition priming reveals an abstract representation of number in the parietal lobes. Cereb Cortex. 11:966-974.
24. Norman-Haignere SV, McCarthy G, Chun MM, Turk-Browne NB. 2012. Category-selective background connectivity in ventral visual cortex. Cereb Cortex. 22:391-402.
25. Rao RP, Ballard DH. 1999. Predictive coding in the visual cortex: a functional interpretation of some extra-classical receptive-field effects. Nature Neurosci. 2:79-87.
26. Rotshtein P, Henson RN, Treves A, Driver J, Dolan RJ. 2005. Morphing Marilyn into Maggie dissociates physical and identity face representations in the brain. Nature Neurosci. 8:107-113.
27. Rushworth MF, Mars RB, Summerfield C. 2009. General mechanisms for making decisions? Curr Opin Neurobiol. 19:75-83.
28. Schultz W, Dayan P, Montague PR. 1997. A neural substrate of prediction and reward. Science. 275:1593-1599.
29. Schultz W, Dickinson A. 2000. Neuronal coding of prediction errors. Annu Rev Neurosci. 23:473-500.
30. Smith FW, Muckli L. 2010. Nonstimulated early visual areas carry information about surrounding context. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 107:20099-20103.
31. Spratling MW. 2008. Reconciling predictive coding and biased competition models of cortical function. Front Comput Neurosci. 2:4.
32. Summerfield C, Greene M, Wager T, Egner T, Hirsch J, Mangels J. 2006. Neocortical connectivity during episodic memory formation. PLoS Biol. 4:e128. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0040128.
33. Summerfield C, Trittschuh EH, Monti JM, Mesulam MM, Egner T. 2008. Neural repetition suppression reflects fulfilled perceptual expectations. Nature Neurosci. 11:1004-1006.
34. Summerfield C, Wyart V, Johnen VM, de Gardelle V. 2011. Human scalp electroencephalography reveals that repetition suppression varies with expectation. Front Hum Neurosci. 5:67.
35. Tanaka K. 1996. Inferotemporal cortex and object vision. Annu Rev Neurosci. 19:109-139.
36. Turk-Browne NB, Yi DJ, Chun MM. 2006. Linking implicit and explicit memory: common encoding factors and shared representations. Neuron. 49:917-927.
37. Turk-Browne NB, Yi DJ, Leber AB, Chun MM. 2007. Visual quality determines the direction of neural repetition effects. Cereb Cortex. 17:425-433.
38. Ullman S. 1995. Sequence seeking and counter streams: a computational model for bidirectional information flow in the visual cortex. Cereb Cortex. 5:1-11.
39. van Turennout M, Ellmore T, Martin A. 2000. Long-lasting cortical plasticity in the object naming system. Nature Neurosci. 3:1329-1334.
40. Vuilleumier P, Henson RN, Driver J, Dolan RJ. 2002. Multiple levels of visual object constancy revealed by event-related fMRI of repetition priming. Nature Neurosci. 5:491-499.
41. Weigelt S, Limbach K, Singer W, Kohler A. 2012. Orientation-selective functional magnetic resonance imaging adaptation in primary visual cortex revisited. Hum Brain Mapp. 33:707-714.