Laparoscopic versus conventional ileoanal pouch procedure in patients undergoing elective restorative proctocolectomy (LapConPouch Trial) - A randomized controlled trial

Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery

Volumn 398, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 807-816

  Schiessling, Serin ^a   Leowardi, Christine ^a   Kienle, Peter ^b   Antolovic, Dalibor ^a   Knebel, Phillip ^a   Bruckner, Thomas ^a   Kadmon, Martina ^a   Seiler, Christoph M ^c   Büchler, Markus W ^a   Diener, Markus K ^a   Ulrich, Alexis ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANNHEIM   (Germany)

^c GRN Hospitals Rhein Neckar   (Germany)

Author keywords

Blood loss; Conventional surgery; Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP); Laparoscopy; Proctocolectomy; Ulcerative colitis (UC)

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTIVE SURGERY; FAMILIAL COLON POLYPOSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTESTINE FUNCTION; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; OPERATION DURATION; OPERATIVE BLOOD LOSS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCTOCOLECTOMY; QUALITY OF LIFE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SKIN INCISION; TREATMENT RESPONSE; ULCERATIVE COLITIS;

ADENOMATOUS POLYPOSIS COLI; ADULT; BLOOD LOSS, SURGICAL; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; COLITIS, ULCERATIVE; COLONIC POUCHES; FEMALE; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; LAPAROTOMY; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OPERATIVE TIME; PATIENT SELECTION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROCTOCOLECTOMY, RESTORATIVE; PROGNOSIS; QUALITY OF LIFE; RISK ASSESSMENT; SINGLE-BLIND METHOD; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, ELECTIVE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84881104844     PISSN: 14352443     EISSN: 14352451     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00423-013-1088-z     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Weeks JC, Nelson H, Gelber S, Sargent D, Schroeder G, Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy (COST) Study Group (2002) Short-term quality-of-life outcomes following laparoscopic-assisted colectomy vs open colectomy for colon cancer: a randomized trial. JAMA 287(3):321-328
2. Sardinha TC, Wexner SD (1998) Laparoscopy for inflammatory bowel disease: pros and cons. World J Surg 22(4):370-374
3. Marcello PW, Milsom JW, Wong SK, Hammerhofer KA, Goormastic M, Church JM et al (2000) Laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy: case-matched comparative study with open restorative proctocolectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 43(5):604-608
4. Maartense S, Dunker MS, Slors JF, Cuesta MA, Gouma DJ, van Deventer SJ et al (2004) Hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis: a randomized trial. Ann Surg 240(6):984-991, discussion 991-2
5. Fleming FJ, Francone TD, Kim MJ, Gunzler D, Messing S, Monson JR (2011) A laparoscopic approach does reduce short-term complications in patients undergoing ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 54(2):176-182
6. Fajardo AD, Dharmarajan S, George V, Hunt SR, Birnbaum EH, Fleshman JW et al (2010) Laparoscopic versus open 2-stage ileal pouch: laparoscopic approach allows for faster restoration of intestinal continuity. J Am Coll Surg 211(3):377-383
7. Sammour T, Kahokehr A, Srinivasa S, Bissett IP, Hill AG (2011) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery is associated with a higher intraoperative complication rate than open surgery. Ann Surg 253(1):35-43, Review
8. Antolovic D, Kienle P, Knaebel HP, Schmidt J, Gutt CN, Weitz J et al (2006) Totally laparoscopic versus conventional ileoanal pouch procedure - design of a single-centre, expertise based randomised controlled trial to compare the laparoscopic and conventional surgical approach in patients undergoing primary elective restorative proctocolectomy - LapConPouch-trial. BMC Surg 6:13
9. Kienle P, Z'graggen K, Schmidt J, Benner A, Weitz J, Büchler MW (2005) Laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy. Br J Surg 92(1):88-93
10. Ware J.E. Kosinski M. Keller S.D. 1994.
11. Dunker MS, Bemelman WA, Slors JF, van Duijvendijk P, Gouma DJ (2001) Functional outcome, quality of life, body image, and cosmesis in patients after laparoscopic-assisted and conventional restorative proctocolectomy: a comparative study. Dis Colon Rectum 44(12):1800-1807
12. Food and Drug Administration, Department of Health and human Services. International Conference on Harmonization (1998) Guidance on statistical principles for clinical trials, availability. Fed Regist 63(179) http://www.fda.gov/downloads/RegulatoryInformation/Guidances/UCM129505.pdf
13. Psaty BM, Rennie D (2003) Stopping medical research to save money: a broken pact with researchers and patients. JAMA 289(16):2128-2131
14. Schroen AT, Petroni GR, Wang H, Gray R, Wang XF, Cronin W et al (2010) Preliminary evaluation of factors associated with premature trial closure and feasibility of accrual benchmarks in phase III oncology trials. Clin Trials 7(4):312-321, Epub 2010Jul 1
15. Taylor KM, Feldstein ML, Skeel RT, Pandya KJ, Ng P, Carbone PP (1994) Fundamental dilemmas of the randomized clinical trial process: results of a survey of the 1,737 Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group investigators. J Clin Oncol 12(9):1796-1805
16. Ahmed Ali U, Keus F, Heikens JT, Bemelman WA, Berdah SV, Gooszen HG et al (2009) Open versus laparoscopic (assisted) ileo pouch anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev Jan 21(1):CD006267 Review doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006267.pub2
17. Wu XJ, He XS, Zhou XY, Ke J, Lan P (2010) The role of laparoscopic surgery for ulcerative colitis: systematic review with meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 25(8):949
18. Tilney HS, Lovegrove RE, Heriot AG, Purkayastha S, Constantinides V, Nicholls RJ et al (2007) Comparison of short-term outcomes of laparoscopic vs open approaches to ileal pouch surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis 22(5):531-542, Epub 2006 Aug 10, review
19. Araki Y, Isomoto H, Tsuzi Y, Matsumoto A, Yasunaga M, Toh U et al (1998) Clinical aspects of total colectomy - laparoscopic versus open technique for familial adenomatous polyposis and ulcerative colitis. Kurume Med J 45(2):203-207
20. Flores P, Bailez MM, Cuenca E, Fraire C (2010) Comparative analysis between laparoscopic (UCL) and open (UCO) technique for the treatment of ulcerative colitis in pediatric patients. Pediatr Surg Int 26(9):907-911, Epub 2010 Jul 15
21. Polle SW, Dunker MS, Slors JF, Sprangers MA, Cuesta MA, Gouma DJ et al (2007) Body image, cosmesis, quality of life, and functional outcome of hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open restorative proctocolectomy: long-term results of a randomized trial. Surg Endosc 21(8):1301-1307, Epub 2007 May 24
22. Larson DW, Davies MM, Dozois EJ, Cima RR, Piotrowicz K, Anderson K et al (2008) Sexual function, body image, and quality of life after laparoscopic and open ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 51(4):392-396, Epub 2008 Jan 24
23. Franzoi SL, Koehler V (1998) Age and gender differences in body attitudes: a comparison of young and elderly adults. Int J Aging Hum Dev 47(1):1-10
24. Berdah SV, Mardion RB, Grimaud JC, Barthet M, Orsoni P, Moutardier V et al (2009) Mid-term functional outcome of laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy: a prospective study of 40 consecutive cases. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 19(4):485-488