Estimating Temporal Causal Interaction between Spike Trains with Permutation and Transfer Entropy

PLoS ONE

Volumn 8, Issue 8, 2013, Pages

  Li, Zhaohui ^a   Li, Xiaoli ^b  

^a YANSHAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b BEIJING NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; BRAIN CELL; CELL INTERACTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENTROPY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; NERVE CELL NETWORK; NERVE CONDUCTION; NONLINEAR SYSTEM; NORMALIZED PERMUTATION TRANSFER ENTROPY; PERMUTATION CONDITIONAL MUTUAL INFORMATION; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SPIKE WAVE; SYMBOLIC TRANSFER ENTROPY;

EID: 84881103032     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070894     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Szczepanski J, Arnold M, Wajnryb E, Amigo JM, Sanchez-Vives MV, (2011) Mutual information and redundancy in spontaneous communication between cortical neurons. Biol Cybern 104: 161-174.
2. Rolls ET, Treves A, (2011) The neuronal encoding of information in the brain. Prog Neurobiol 95: 448-490.
3. Victor JD, Purpura KP, (1996) Nature and precision of temporal coding in visual cortex: a metric-space analysis. J Neurophysiol 76: 1310-1326.
4. van Rossum MC, (2001) A novel spike distance. Neural Comput 13: 751-763.
5. Quian Quiroga R, Kreuz T, Grassberger P, (2002) Event synchronization: a simple and fast method to measure synchronicity and time delay patterns. Phys Rev E 66: 041904.
6. Schreiber S, Fellous JM, Whitmer D, Tiesinga P, Sejnowski TJ, (2003) A new correlation-based measure of spike timing reliability. Neurocomputing 52-54: 925-931.
7. Kreuz T, Haas JS, Morelli A, Abarbanel HDI, Politi A, (2007) Measuring spike train synchrony. J Neurosci Methods 165: 151-161.
8. Vejmelka M, Palus M, (2008) Inferring the directionality of coupling with conditional mutual information. Phys Rev E 77: 026214.
9. Martini M, Kranz TA, Wagner T, Lehnertz K, (2011) Inferring directional interactions from transient signals with symbolic transfer entropy. Phys Rev E 83: 011919.
10. Cadotte AJ, DeMarse TB, He P, Ding M, (2008) Causal measures of structure and plasticity in simulated and living neural networks. PLoS One 3: e3355.
11. Dhamala M, Rangarajan G, Ding M, (2008) Analyzing information flow in brain networks with nonparametric Granger causality. NeuroImage 41: 354-362.
12. Kim S, Putrino D, Ghosh S, Brown EN, (2011) A Granger causality measure for point process models of ensemble neural spiking activity. PLoS Comput Biol 7: e1001110.
13. Li Z, Ouyang G, Li D, Li X, (2011) Characterization of the causality between spike trains with permutation conditional mutual information. Phys Rev E 84: 021929.
14. Waddell J, Dzakpasu R, Booth V, Riley B, Reasor J, et al. (2007) Causal entropies-A measure for determining changes in the temporal organization of neural systems. J Neurosci Methods 162: 320-332.
15. Gourévitch B, Eggermont J, (2007) Evaluating Information Transfer Between Auditory Cortical Neurons. J Neurophysiol 97: 2533-2543.
16. Li X, Ouyang G, (2010) Estimating coupling direction between neuronal populations with permutation conditional mutual information. NeuroImage 52: 497-507.
17. Bahraminasab A, Ghasemi F, Stefanovska A, McClintock P, Kantz H, (2008) Direction of coupling from phases of interacting oscillators: A permutation information approach. Phys Rev Lett 100: 84101.
18. Bandt C, Pompe B, (2002) Permutation entropy: A natural complexity measure for time series. Phys Rev Lett 88: 174102.
19. Schreiber T, (2000) Measuring information transfer. Phys Rev Lett 85: 461-464.
20. Staniek M, Lehnertz K, (2008) Symbolic transfer entropy. Phys Rev Lett 100: 158101.
21. Kaiser A, Schreiber T, (2002) Information transfer in continuous processes. Physica D 166: 43-62.
22. Strong S, Koberle R, de Ruyter van Steveninck R, Bialek W, (1998) Entropy and information in neural spike trains. Phys Rev Lett 80: 197-200.
23. Olofsen E, Sleigh JW, Dahan A, (2008) Permutation entropy of the electroencephalogram: a measure of anaesthetic drug effect. Br J Anaesth 101: 810-821.
24. Izhikevich EM, (2003) Simple model of spiking neurons. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 14: 1569-1572.
25. Izhikevich EM, (2006) Polychronization: computation with spikes. Neural Comput 18: 245-282.
26. Lubenov EV, Siapas AG, (2008) Decoupling through Synchrony in Neuronal Circuits with Propagation Delays. Neuron 58: 118-131.
27. Izhikevich EM, Edelman GM, (2008) Large-scale model of mammalian thalamocortical systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105: 3593-3598.
28. Izhikevich EM, (2007) Solving the Distal Reward Problem through Linkage of STDP and Dopamine Signaling. Cerebral Cortex 17: 2443-2452.
29. Ito S, Hansen ME, Heiland R, Lumsdaine A, Litke AM, et al. (2011) Extending Transfer Entropy Improves Identification of Effective Connectivity in a Spiking Cortical Network Model. PLoS One 6: e27431.