Shared care is a model for patients with stable prostate cancer

Danish Medical Journal

Volumn 60, Issue 8, 2013, Pages 9-

  Lund, Lars ^a   Jønler, Morten ^a   Graversen, Peder H ^b   Borre, Michael ^c   Bro, Flemming ^d  

^a Department of Urology   (Denmark)

^b Department of Urology   (Denmark)

^c AARHUS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

^d AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; FOLLOW UP; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MONITORING; PATIENT CARE; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; PROSTATE CANCER;

EID: 84881074283     PISSN: None     EISSN: 22451919     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. The Danish registry of death causes 2009. Copenhagen: National Danish Board of Health, 2011. www.sst.dk/publ/Publ2010/DOKU/Registre/ Doedsaarsagsregisteret2009.pdf. (Jan 2011).
2. Cancer incidence in Denmark 2009. Copenhagen: National Danish Board of Health, 2011. www.sst.dk/publ/Publ2010/DOKU/Registre/ Cancerregisteret2009.pdf (Jan 2011).
3. Anvik T, Holtedahl KAMikalsen H.,"When patients have cancer, they stop seeing me" - the role of the general practitioner in early follow-up of patients with cancer - a qualitative study. BMC Fam Pract 2006;7:19.
4. Lewis RA, Neal RD, Williams NH et al. Follow-up of cancer in primary care versus secondary care: systematic review. Br J Gen Pract 2009;59:234-47.
5. Etim AE, Schellhase KG, Sparapani R et al. Effect of model of care delivery on mammography use among elderly breast cancer survivors. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2006;96:293-9.
6. Cheung WY, Neville BA, Cameron DB et al. Comparisons of patient and physician expectations for cancer survivorship care. J Clin Oncol 2009;27: 2489-95.
7. Burstein HJ, Winer EP. Primary care for survivors of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2000;343:1086-94.
8. HebertøCroteau N, Brisson J, Latreille J et al. Compliance with consensus recommendations for systemic therapy is associated with improved survival of women with node-negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2004;22:3685-93.
9. Mille D, Roy T, Carrère MO et al. Economic impact of harmonizing medical practices: compliance with clinical practice guidelines in the follow-up of breast cancer in a French Comprehensive Cancer Center. J Clin Oncol 2000;18:1718-24.
10. Smith TJ, Hillner BE. Ensuring quality cancer care by the use of clinical practice guidelines and critical pathways. J Clin Oncol 2001;19:2886-97.
11. McNicholas TA. Lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic obstruction: what are the current practice patterns? Eur Urol 2001;39:26-30.
12. Lukacs B. Management of symptomatic BPH in France: who is treated and how? Eur Urol 1999;36:14-20.
13. Tubaro A, Montanari E. Management of symptomatic BPH in Italy: Who is treated and how? Eur Urol 1999;36:28-32.
14. Dixon JM, Montgomery D. Follow-up after breast cancer. BMJ 2008;336: 107-8.
15. Dixon JM, Montgomery DA. Extended follow-up of breast cancer patients in clinic wastes time for both patients and doctors: the case for. Breast Cancer Res 2008;10(Suppl 4):S8.
16. Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S et al. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: new guidance. London: Medical Research Council, 2008.
17. Peterson KJ. Shared decision making in health care settings: a role for social work. Soc Work Health Care 2012;51:894-908.
18. Madarnas Y, Joy AA, Verma S et al. Models of care for early-stage breast cancer in Canada. Curr Oncol 2011;18:10-9.
19. Worster A, Bass MJ, Wood ML. Willingness to follow breast cancer. Survey of family physicians. Can Fam Physician 1996;42:263-8.
20. Hawe P, Shiell A, Riley T. Complex interventions: how "out of control" can a randomized controlled trial be? Br Med J 2004;328:1561-3.