Delineation of groundwater potential zone: An AHP/ANP approach

Journal of Earth System Science

Volumn 122, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 887-898

  Agarwal, Etishree ^a   Agarwal, Rajat ^a   Garg, R D ^a   Garg, P K ^a  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY ROORKEE   (India)

Author keywords

Analytical network process; Groundwater; Multi criteria decision making

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; DECISION MAKING; EXPLOITATION; GIS; GROUNDWATER EXPLORATION; GROUNDWATER RESOURCE; MULTICRITERIA ANALYSIS; NUMERICAL MODEL; REMOTE SENSING; SATELLITE DATA; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

INDIA; UNNAO; UTTAR PRADESH;

EID: 84881074170     PISSN: 02534126     EISSN: 0973774X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12040-013-0309-8     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Banai R. 2010 Evaluation of land use-transportation systems with the analytic network process; Journal of Transport and Land Use 3(1) 85-112.
2. Cheng E. W L and Li H 2004 Contractor selection using the analytic network process; Construction Management and Economics 22 1021-1032.
3. Chowdhury A., Jha M K, Chowdhary V M and Mal B C 2009 Integrated remote sensing and GIS-based approach for accessing groundwater potential in west Medinipur district, West Bengal, India; Int. J. Remote Sens. 30(1) 231-250.
4. Dagdeviren M. and Ihsan Y 2007 Personnel selection using analytic network process; Istanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi Yil 6(11) 99-118.
5. Jaiswal R., Mukherjee S, Krishnamurthy J and Saxena R 2003 Role of remote sensing and GIS techniques for generation of groundwater prospect zone towards rural development-an approach; Int. J. Remote Sens. 24(5) 993-108.
6. Krishnamurthy J., Kumar N V, Jayaraman V and Manivel M 1996 An approach to demarcate groundwater potential zone through remote sensing and a geographic information system; Int. J. Remote Sens. 17(10) 1867-1884.
7. Machiwal D., Jha M K and Mal B C 2011 Assessment of groundwater potential in a semi-arid region of India using remote sensing, GIS and MCDM techniques; J. Water Resourc. Manag. 25(5) 1359-1386.
8. Malczewski J. 1999 GIS and multicriteria decision analysis (New York: John Wiley & Sons), 392p.
9. MOWR 2009 Report of the Groundwater Resource Estimation Committee; Ministry of Water Resources, Government of India, New Delhi, http://www.cgwb.gov.in.
10. Saaty T. L 1980 The Analytic Hierarchy Process; McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
11. Saaty T. L 1996 Decision making with dependence and feedback, The Analytic Network Process; RWS Publications, Pittsburgh.
12. Saaty T. L 1999 Fundamentals of the analytic network process; International Symposium of the Analytic Hierarchy Process (ISAHP), Kobe, Japan.
13. Saaty T. L 2004 Fundamentals of the analytic network process-multiple networks with benefits, costs, opportunities and risks; J. Systems Science and Systems Engineering 13(3) 348-379.
14. Sun H., Xu G and Tian P 2007 Design alternatives evaluation of emergency bridge by applying analytic network process (ANP); System Engineering Theory and Practice 27(3) 63-70.
15. Tran L. T, Knight C G, O'Neill R V and Smith E R 2004 Integrated environmental assessment of the Mid-Atlantic Region with Analytical Network Process; Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, Kluwer Academic Publishers 94 263-277.
16. Wang Ru-Hang, Huang Jian-Guo and Zhang Qun-Fei 2009 Underwater multiple target tracking decision making based on an analytic network process; Journal of Marine Science Application 8(4) 305-310.
17. Yang C. L, Chuang S P, Huang R H and Tai C C 2008 Location selection based on AHP/ANP approach; IEEE, International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, Singapore, pp. 1148-1153.