Agent-based modelling of residential mobility, housing choice and regeneration

Agent-Based Models of Geographical Systems

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 511-524

  Jordan, René ^a   Birkin, Mark ^a   Evans, Andrew ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84881036947     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-90-481-8927-4_25     Document Type: Chapter

References (32)

1. Aguilera, A., &Ugalde, E. (2007). A spatially extended model for residential segregation.Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society.doi:10.1155/2007/48589.
2. Benenson, I. (2004). Agent-based modeling: From individual residential choice to urban residential dynamics. In M. F. Goodchild &D. G. Janelle (Eds.), Spatially integrated social science: Examples in best practice(pp. 67-95). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3. Black, S. (1999). Do better schools matter? Parental valuation of elementary education.Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114,578-599.
4. Blau, J. (2000). Group enmity and accord: The commercial press in three American cities.Social Science History,24(2), 395-413.
5. Boehm, T. (1982). A hierarchical model of housing choice.Urban Studies,19(1), 17-31.
6. Boheim, R., &Taylor, M. P. (1999).Residential mobility, housing tenure and the labour market in Britain(ILR working papers 035). London: Institute for Labour Research.
7. Bridge, G. (2002).The neighbourhood and social neworks(Centre for Neighbourhood Research, Paper, 4). CNR: London.
8. CCSR (The Cathie Marsh Centre for Census and Survey Research). (2010).The Samples of Anonymised Records (SARS)[online]. Accessed June 8, 2010. Available fromhttp://www.ccsr. ac.uk/sars/2001/hhold/variables/
9. Cho, Y. (2004). Who moves and where? A comparison of housing association tenants in London and northern regions. InHousing corporation sector studies 40.London: Housing Corporation.
10. Cho, Y., Lyall Grant, F., &Whitehead, C. (2004). Affordable housing in London: Who expects to move and where? InHousing Corporation Sector Studies 39.London: Housing Corporation.
11. Dieleman, F. (2001). Modelling residential mobility: A review of recent trends in research.Journal of Housing and the Built Environment,16(3), 249-265.
12. Gibbons, S., &Machin, S. (2003). Valuing English primary schools.Journal of Urban Economics, 53,197-219.
13. Gjessing, M. (2009).Interview withReneJordan.December 11, 2009. Leeds.
14. Johnston, R. J., Poulsen, M. F., &Forrest, J. (2002). Are there ethnic enclaves/ghettos in English cities?Urban Studies, 39,591-618.
15. Jordan, R., Birkin, M., &Evans, A. (2011). Agent-based simulation modelling of housing choice and urban regeneration policy. In T. Bosse, A. Geller, &C. Jonker (Eds.), Multi-agent-based simulation XI(pp. 152-166). Berlin: Springer.
16. Kim, J., Pagliara, F., &Preston, J. (2005). The intention to move and residential location choice behaviour.Urban Studies,42(9), 1621-1636.
17. Laurie, A., &Jaggi, N. (2003). The role of ‘vision’ in neighbourhood racial segregation: A variant of the Schelling segregation model.Urban Studies,40(13), 2687-2704.
18. Leeds City Council. (2007).East and south east Leeds area actionplan: Leeds local development framework. Leeds: Leeds City Council.
19. Muhins, D., &Murie, A. (2006).Housing policy in the UK.Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
20. Pancs, R., &Vriend, N. (2007). Schelling’s spatial proximity model of segregation revisited.Journal of Public Economics, 91,1-24.
21. Peach, C. (1999). London and New York: Contrasts in British and American models of segregation.International Journal of Population Geography, 5,319-351.
22. Phillips, D. (1998). Black minority ethnic concentration, segregation and dispersal in Britain.Urban Studies,35(10), 1681-1702.
23. Phillips, D. (2007). Ethnic and racial segregation: A critical perspective.Geography Compass,1(5), 1138-1159.
24. Power, A., &Mumford, K. (1999).The slow death of great cities? Urban abandonment or urban renaissance. York: York Publishing Services Limited.
25. Schelling, T. (1969). Models of segregation.The American Economic Review,59(2), 488-493.
26. Schelling, T. (1971). Dynamic models of segregation.Journal of Mathematical Sociology,1(2), 143-186.
27. Strand, S. (2002). Pupil mobility, attainment and progress in Key Stage 1: A study in cautious interpretation.British Education Research Journal, 28,63-78.
28. Tu, Y., &Goldfinch, J. (1996). A two-stage housing choice forecasting model.Urban Studies,33(3), 517-537.
29. Tunstall, R. (2003). ‘Mixed tenure’ policy in the UK: Privatization, pluralism or euphemism?Housing, Theory and Society, 20, 153-159.
30. Yin, L. (2009). The dynamics of residential segregation in Buffalo: An agent-based simulation.Urban Studies,46(13), 2749-2770.
31. Zhang, J. (2004a). A dynamic model of residential segregation.Journal of Mathematical Sociology,28(3), 147-170.
32. Zhang, J. (2004b). Residential segregation in an all-integrationist world.Journal of Economic Behavior &Organization,54(4), 533-550.