Codling Moth, Cydia pomonella, Captures in Monitoring Traps as Influenced by Proximately to Competing Female-Like- vs. High-Releasing Pheromone Point Sources

Journal of Insect Behavior

Volumn 26, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 660-666

  Huang, Juan ^a   Gut, Larry J ^a   Miller, James R ^a  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Competitive attraction; Isomate C Plus; plume selection

Indexed keywords

CYDIA POMONELLA; LEPIDOPTERA; MALUS X DOMESTICA;

EID: 84881023499     PISSN: 08927553     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10905-013-9381-9     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Arn H, Guerin M, Buser HR, Rauscher S, Mani E (1985) Sex pheromone blend of the codling moth, Cydia pomonella: evidence for a behavioral role of dodecan-1-ol. Experientia 41: 1482-1484.
2. Bäckman AC, Bengtsson M, Witzgall P (1996) Pheromone release by individual females of codling moth, Cydia pomonella. J Chem Ecol 23: 807-815.
3. Barrett B (1995) Effect of synthetic pheromone permeation on captures of male codling moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in pheromone and virgin female moth-baited traps at different tree heights in small orchard blocks. Environ Entomol 24: 1201-1206.
4. Gut LJ, Stellinski LL, Thomson DR, Miller JR (2004) Behavior-modifying chemicals: Prospects and constraints in IPM. In: Koul O, Dhaliwal GS, Cuperus G (eds) Integrated pest management-potential, constraints, and challenges. CABI, New York, pp 73-121.
5. Kennedy JS, Ludlow AR, Sanders CJ (1981) Guidance of flying male moths by wind-borne sex pheromone. Physiol Entomol 6: 395-412.
6. Knight AL, Croft BA, Bloem KB (1999) Effect of mating disruption dispenser placement on trap performance for monitoring codling moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). J Entomol Soc Br Columbia 96: 95-102.
7. Kuenen LPS, Baker TC (1981) Habituation versus sensory adaptation as the cause of reduced attraction following pulsed and constant sex pheromone pre-exposure in Trichoplusia ni. J Insect Physiol 27: 721-726.
8. Millar JG (1995) Degradation and stabilization of E8, E10-dodecadienol, the major component of the sex pheromone of the codling moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). J Econ Entomol 88: 1425-1432.
9. Miller JR, McGhee PS, Siegert PY, Adams CG, Huang J, Grieshop MJ, Gut LJ (2010) General principles of attraction and competitive attraction as revealed by large-cage studies of moths responding to sex pheromone. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107(374): 22-27.
10. SAS Institute (2010) SAS/STAT user's guide, version 6, 4th 383 edition, vol. 1. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.
11. Stelinski LL, Gut LJ, Epstein D, Miller JR (2005) Attraction of four tortricid moth species to high dosage pheromone rope dispensers: observations implicating false plume following as an important factor in mating disruption. IOBC/WPRS Bull 28: 313-317.
12. Stelinski LL, Gut LJ, Miller JR (2006) Orientational behaviors and EAG responses of male codling moth after exposure to synthetic sex pheromone from various dispensers. J Chem Ecol 32: 1527-1538.
13. Thomson D, Brunner J, Gut L, Judd G, Knight A (2001) Ten years implementing codling moth mating disruption in the orchards of Washington and British Columbia: starting right and managing for success. IOBC/WPRS Bull 24: 23-30.
14. Willis MA, Baker TC (1984) Effects of intermittent and continuous pheromone stimulation on the flight behavior of the oriental fruit moth, Grapholita molesta. Physiol Entomol 9: 341-358.