Implant diameter and length influence on survival: Interim results during the first 2 years of function of implants by a single manufacturer

Implant Dentistry

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 394-398

  Mijiritsky, Eitan ^a   Mazor, Ziv ^b   Lorean, Adi ^c   Levin, Liran ^d,e,f  

^a TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

^b Private Practice   (Israel)

^c Rambam Health Care Campus ^*  (Israel)

^d Endodontics and Dental Trauma Unit   (Israel)

^e TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Israel)

^f HARVARD SCHOOL OF DENTAL MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

alveolar bone; bone width; dental implantation; mandible; maxilla; successsurvival

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; DENTAL SURGERY; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MANDIBLE; MAXILLA; MIDDLE AGED; ORAL SURGERY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; STATISTICS; SURFACE PROPERTY; SURVIVAL; TOOTH IMPLANT; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; VERY ELDERLY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ALVEOLAR RIDGE AUGMENTATION; COHORT STUDIES; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; IMMEDIATE DENTAL IMPLANT LOADING; MANDIBLE; MAXILLA; MIDDLE AGED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SURFACE PROPERTIES; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84881022090     PISSN: 10566163     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ID.0b013e31829afac0     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Levin L, Sadet P, Grossmann Y. A retrospective evaluation of 1,387 singletooth implants: A 6-year follow-Up. J Periodontol. 2006;77:2080-2083
2. Levin L. Dealing with dental implant failures. J Appl Oral Sci. 2008;16:171-175
3. Smith DC. Dental implants: Materials and design considerations. Int J Prosthodont. 1993;6:106-117
4. Esposito M, Murray-Curtis L, Grusovin MG, et al. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: Different types of dental implants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;4:CD003815
5. Levin L, Nitzan D, Schwartz-Arad D. Success of dental implants placed in intraoral block bone grafts. J Periodontol. 2007;78:18-21
6. Levin L, Herzberg R, Dolev E, et al. Smoking and complications of onlay bone grafts and sinus lift operations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004;19: 369-373
7. Esposito M, Pellegrino G, Pistilli R, et al. Rehabilitation of posterior atrophic edentulous jaws: Prostheses supported by 5 mm short implants or by longer implants in augmented bone? Oneyear results from a pilot randomized clinical trial. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2011; 4:21-30
8. Hagi D, Deporter DA, Pilliar RM, et al. A targeted review of study outcomes with short (X7 mm) endosseous dental implants in partially edentulous patients. J Periodontol. 2004;75: 798-804
9. Das Neves FD, Fones D, Bernardes SR, et al. Short implantsdAn analysis of longitudinal studies. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2006;21:86-93
10. Renouard F, Nisand D. Impact of length and diameter on survival rates. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006:17:35-51
11. Telleman G, Raghoebar GM, Vissink A, et al. A systematic review of the prognosis of short (,10 mm) dental implants placed in the partially edentulous patient. J Clin Periodontol. 2011; 38:667-676
12. Morand M, Irinakis T. The challenge of implant therapy in the posterior maxilla: Providing a rationale for the use of short implants. J Oral Implantol. 2007; 33:257-266
13. Kotsovilis S, Fourmousis I, Karoussis IK, et al. A systematic review and meta-Analysis on the effect of implant length on the survival of rough-surface dental implants. J Periodontol. 2009;80: 1700-1718
14. Romeo E, Bivio A, Mosca D, et al. The use of short dental implants in clinical practice: Literature review. Minerva Stomatol. 2010;59:23-31
15. Lee JH, Frias V, Lee KW, et al. Effect of implant size and shape on implant success rates: A literature review. J Prosthet Dent. 2005;94:377-381
16. Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Rees J, et al. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: Augmentation procedures of the maxillary sinus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;17:CD008397
17. Himmlová L, Dostálová T, Kácovský A, et al. Influence of implant length and diameter on stress distribution: A finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2004;91:20-25
18. Mohammed Ibrahim M, Thulasingam C, Nasser KS, et al. Evaluation of design parameters of dental implant shape, diameter and length on stress distribution: A finite element analysis. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2011;11: 165-171
19. Arisan V, Bölükbaş i N, Ersanli S, et al. Evaluation of 316 narrow diameter implants followed for 5-10 years: A clinical and radiographic retrospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010;21:296-307
20. Davarpanah M, Martinez H, Tecucianu JF, et al. Small-diameter implants: Indications and contraindications. J Esthet Dent. 2000;12:186-194
21. Sohrabi K, Mushantat A, Esfandiari S, et al. How successful are small-diameter implants? A literature review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012; 23:515-525
22. Elsyad MA, Gebreel AA, Fouad MM, et al. The clinical and radiographic outcome of immediately loaded mini implants supporting a mandibular overdenture. A 3-year prospective study. J Oral Rehabil. 2011;38:827-834
23. Olate S, Lyrio MC, de Moraes M, et al. Influence of diameter and length of implant on early dental implant failure. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010;68: 414-419
24. Levin L, Ofec R, Grossmann Y, et al. Periodontal disease as a risk for dental implant failure over time: A long-Term historical cohort study. J Clin Peri. 2011; 38:732-737
25. Levin L. Ethics in the dental implant era. Quintessence Int. 2012; 43:351