An automated system for the recognition of various specific rat behaviours

Journal of Neuroscience Methods

Volumn 218, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 214-224

  Van Dam, Elsbeth A ^a   Van Der Harst, Johanneke E ^b   Ter Braak, Cajo J F ^c   Tegelenbosch, Ruud A J ^a   Spruijt, Berry M ^b   Noldus, Lucas P J J ^a  

^a Noldus Information Technology bv   (Netherlands)

^b Delta Phenomics BV   (Netherlands)

^c WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Behaviour recognition; Pharmacological validation; Rat; Real time analysis; Video

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; AUTOMATED BEHAVIOR RECOGNITION; BEHAVIOR; CAMERA; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRINKING; EATING; GROOMING; JUMPING; MALE; MUSCLE TWITCH; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; RECOGNITION; REST; SNIFFING;

BEHAVIOUR RECOGNITION; PHARMACOLOGICAL VALIDATION; RAT; REAL-TIME ANALYSIS; VIDEO;

ANIMALS; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; AUTOMATION; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; NEUROSCIENCES; RATS; VIDEO RECORDING;

EID: 84881016603     PISSN: 01650270     EISSN: 1872678X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2013.05.012     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Aggarwal J.K., Ryoo M.S. Human activity analysis: a review. ACM Comput Surv 2011, 43:16:1-16:43.
2. Aitchison J., Greenacre M. Biplots of compositional data. J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat 2002, 51:375-392.
3. Alvarez J.D.N., Fukushiro D.F., Tatsu J.A.O., de Carvalho E.P., Gandolfi A.C.D.C., Tsuchiya J.B., et al. Amphetamine-induced rapid-onset sensitization: role of novelty, conditioning and behavioral parameters. Pharmacol Biochem and Behav 2006, 83(4):500-507.
4. Benjamini Y., Fonio E., Galili T., Havkin Z.G., Golani I. Quantifying the buildup in extent and complexity of free exploration in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011, 108:15580-15587.
5. Braak C.J.F.ter, Šmilauer P. Canoco reference manual and user's guide: software for ordination, version 5.0 2012, 496. Microcomputer Power, Ithaca, USA.
6. Burgos-Artizzu X.P., Dollár P., Lin D., Anderson D.J., Perona P. Social behavior recognition in continuous videos. IEEE Conf Comp Vis and Pattern Recognit (CVPR 2012) 2012.
7. Crabbe J.C., Wahlsten D., Dudek B.C. Genetics of mouse behavior: interactions with laboratory environment. Science 1999, 284(5420):1670-1672.
8. Dankert H., Wang L., Hoopfer E.D., Anderson D.J., Perona P. Automated monitoring and analysis of social behavior in drosophila. Nat Methods 2009, 6(4):297-303.
9. Dollár P., Rabaud V., Cottrell G., Belongie S. Behavior recognition via sparse spatio-temporal features. 2nd Joint IEEE International Workshop on Visual surveillance and performance evaluation of tracking and surveillance, 2005 2005, 65-72. IEEE.
10. Drai D., Kafkafi N., Benjamini Y., Elmer G., Golani I. Rats and mice share common ethologically relevant parameters of exploratory behavior. Behav Brain Res 2001, 125:133-140.
11. Drew K.L., Glick S.D. Characterization of the associative nature of sensitization to amphetamine-induced circling behavior and of the environment dependent placebo-like response. Psychopharmacology 1988, 95(4):482-487.
12. Drew K.L., Glick S.D. Role of D-1 and D-2 receptor stimulation in sensitization to amphetamine-induced circling behavior and in expression and extinction of the Pavlovian conditioned response. Psychopharmacology 1990, 101(4):465-471.
13. Duda R.O., Hart P.E., Stork D.G. Pattern classification 2001, Wiley, New York. second ed.
14. Dunne F., O'Halloran A., Kelly J.P. Development of a home cage locomotor tracking system capable of detecting the stimulant and sedative properties of drugs in rats. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 2007, 31(7):1456-1463.
15. Faraway J.J. Extending the linear model with R. Generalized linear, mixed effects and nonparametric regression models 2006, Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL.
16. Field D.J. Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response properties of cortical cells. J Opt Soc Am A 1987, 4:2379-2394.
17. Fonio E., Benjamini Y., Golani I. Freedom of movement and the stability of its unfolding in free exploration of mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009, 106:21335-21340.
18. Fukunaga K. Introduction to statistical pattern recognition 1990, Academic Press Professional, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA. second ed.
19. Greenacre M.J. Biplots: the joy of singular value decomposition. Wiley interdisciplinary reviews: computational statistics 2012.
20. Jhuang H., Garrote E., Yu X., Khilnani V., Poggio T., Steele A.D., et al. Automated home-cage behavioural phenotyping of mice. Nat Commun 2010, 1(6):68.
21. List T., Bins J., Vazquez J., Fisher R. Performance evaluating the evaluator. Visual surveillance and performance evaluation of tracking and surveillance 2005, 129-136.
22. Lucas B.D., Kanade T. An iterative image registration technique with an application to stereo vision. IJCAI81 1981, 674-679.
23. Measuring behaviour, an introductory guide. Chapter 7: How good are your measures - observer reliability 2007, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. third ed. P. Martin, P. Bateson (Eds.).
24. McCulloch C.E., Searle S.R., Neuhaus J.M. Generalized linear mixed models 2008, Wiley, New York. second ed.
25. Noldus Information Technology EthoVision XT 8.0 2011, http://www.noldus.com/ethovision.
26. Noldus Information Technology The Observer XT 10.0 2011, http://www.noldus.com/observer.
27. R Development Core Team R: a language and environment for statistical computing 2010, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.r-project.org/.
28. Rousseau J.B., Van Lochem P.B., Gispen W.H., Spruijt B.M. Classification of rat behavior with an image-processing method and a neural network. Behav Res Methods 2000, 32(1):63-71.
29. Spruijt B.M., de Visser L. Advanced behavioural screening: automated home cage ethology. Drug Discov Today Technol 2006, 3:231-237.
30. Steele A.D., Jackson W.S., King O.D., Lindquist S. The power of automated high-resolution behavior analysis revealed by its application to mouse models of huntington's and prion diseases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007, 104(6):1983-1988.
31. van der Harst J.E., Baars J.M., Spruijt B.M. Standard housed rats are more sensitive to rewards than enriched housed rats as reflected by their anticipatory behaviour. Behav Brain Res 2003, 142:151-156.
32. van der Harst J.E., Fermont P.C.J., Bilstra A., Spruijt B.M. Access to enriched housing is rewarding to rats as reflected by their anticipatory behaviour. Anim Behav 2003, 66:493-504.
33. Vanderschuren L.J., Schoffelmeer A.N., Mulder A.H., De Vries T.J. Dopaminergic mechanism mediating the long-term expression of locomotor sensitization following pre-exposure to morphine or amphetamine. Psychopharmacology 1999, 143(3):244-253.
34. Wahlsten D.M. Different data from different labs: lessons form studies of gene-environment interaction. J Neurobiol 2002, 54(1):283-311.
35. Wuerbel H. Behavioral phenotyping enhanced - beyond (environmental) standardization. Genes Brain Behav 2002, 1(1):3-8.