Ontology patterns for complex activity modelling

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 8035, Issue , 2013, Pages 144-157

  Meditskos, Georgios ^a   Dasiopoulou, Stamatia ^a   Efstathiou, Vasiliki ^a   Kompatsiaris, Ioannis ^a  

^a Information Technologies Institute   (Greece)

Author keywords

activity modelling; ontologies; patterns; SPARQL rules

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES; SEMANTICS; WEB CRAWLER;

ACTIVITY MODELLING; DOMAIN ONTOLOGIES; FORMAL REPRESENTATIONS; INTEROPERABILITY AND REUSE; INTERPRETATION MODEL; PATTERNS; SPARQL RULES; TEMPORAL ASSOCIATION;

ONTOLOGY;

EID: 84881002368     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-39617-5_15     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. Allen, J.F.: Towards a general theory of action and time. Artif. Intell. 23(2), 123-154 (1984), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(84)90008-0
2. Anicic, D., Fodor, P., Rudolph, S., Stojanovic, N.: Ep-sparql: a unified language for event processing and stream reasoning. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on World Wide Web, WWW 2011, pp. 635-644. ACM, New York (2011), http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1963405.1963495
3. Barbieri, D.F., Braga, D., Ceri, S., Valle, E.D., Grossniklaus, M.: Querying rdf streams with c-sparql. SIGMOD Rec. 39(1), 20-26 (2010)
4. Beltran, V., Arabshian, K., Schulzrinne, H.: Ontology-based user-defined rules and context-aware service composition system. In: García-Castro, R., Fensel, D., Antoniou, G. (eds.) ESWC 2011 Workshops. LNCS, vol. 7117, pp. 139-155. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)
5. Bolles, A., Grawunder, M., Jacobi, J.: Streaming SPARQL - extending SPARQL to process data streams. In: Bechhofer, S., Hauswirth, M., Hoffmann, J., Koubarakis, M. (eds.) ESWC 2008. LNCS, vol. 5021, pp. 448-462. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
6. Chen, L., Nugent, C.D.: Ontology-based activity recognition in intelligent pervasive environments. International Journal of Web Information Systems 5(4), 410-430 (2009)
7. Chen, L., Nugent, C.D., Wang, H.: A knowledge-driven approach to activity recognition in smart homes. IEEE Trans. on Knowl. and Data Eng. 24(6), 961-974 (2012)
8. Debattista, J., Scerri, S., Rivera, I., Handschuh, S.: Ontology-based rules for rec-ommender systems. In: SeRSy, pp. 49-60 (2012)
9. DOLCE+DnS Ultralite (DUL) ontology, http://www.loa.istc.cnr.it/ ontologies/DUL.owl
10. Gangemi, A., Mika, P.: Understanding the semantic web through descriptions and situations. In: Meersman, R., Schmidt, D.C. (eds.) CoopIS/DOA/ODBASE 2003. LNCS, vol. 2888, pp. 689-706. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)
11. van Hage, W.R., Malaisé, V., Segers, R., Hollink, L., Schreiber, G.: Design and use of the Simple Event Model (SEM). J. Web Sem. 9(2), 128-136 (2011)
12. Knublauch, H., Hendler, J.A., Idehen, K.: SPIN - overview and motivation. W3C member submission, World Wide Web Consortium (February 2011)
13. Maria, K., Vasilis, E., Grigoris, A.: S-CRETA: Smart classroom real-time assistance. In: Novais, P., Hallenborg, K., Tapia, D.I., Rodríguez, J.M.C. (eds.) Ambient Intelligence - Software and Applications. AISC, vol. 153, pp. 67-74. Springer, Heidelberg (2012), http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642- 28783-1-9
14. May, W., Alferes, J.J., Amador, R.: An ontology- and resources-based approach to evolution and reactivity in the semantic web. In: Meersman, R. (ed.) OTM 2005, Part II. LNCS, vol. 3761, pp. 1553-1570. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
15. Motik, B., Cuenca Grau, B., Sattler, U.: Structured objects in OWL: representation and reasoning. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW 2008), pp. 555-564. ACM, New York (2008)
16. Okeyo, G., Chen, L., Hui, W., Sterritt, R.: A hybrid ontological and temporal approach for composite activity modelling. In: Min, G., Wu, Y., Liu, L.C., Jin, X., Jarvis, S.A., Al-Dubai, A.Y. (eds.) TrustCom, pp. 1763-1770. IEEE Computer Society (2012)
17. Pan, F., Hobbs, J.R.: Time ontology in OWL. W3C working draft, W3C (September 2006), http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-owl-time-20060927/
18. Patkos, T., Chibani, A., Plexousakis, D., Amirat, Y.: A production rule-based framework for causal and epistemic reasoning. In: Bikakis, A., Giurca, A. (eds.) RuleML 2012. LNCS, vol. 7438, pp. 120-135. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)
19. Patkos, T., Chrysakis, I., Bikakis, A., Plexousakis, D., Antoniou, G.: A reasoning framework for ambient intelligence. In: Konstantopoulos, S., Perantonis, S., Karkaletsis, V., Spyropoulos, CD., Vouros, G. (eds.) SETN 2010. LNCS, vol. 6040, pp. 213-222. Springer, Heidelberg (2010), http://dx.doi.org/10. 1007/978-3-642-12842-4-25
20. Riboni, D., Pareschi, L., Radaelli, L., Bettini, C: Is ontology-based activity recognition really effective? In: 2011 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PERCOM Workshops), pp. 427-431 (March 2011)
21. Riboni, D., Bettini, C: Cosar: hybrid reasoning for context-aware activity recognition. Personal Ubiquitous Comput. 15(3), 271-289 (2011), http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00779-010-0331-7
22. Riboni, D., Bettini, C: Owl 2 modeling and reasoning with complex human activities. Pervasive and Mobile Computing 7(3), 379-395 (2011)
23. Scherp, A., Franz, T., Saathoff, C, Staab, S.: A core ontology on events for representing occurrences in the real world. Multimedia Tools and Applications 58(2), 293-331 (2012)
24. Sirin, E., Parsia, B., Grau, B.C., Kalyanpur, A., Katz, Y.: Pellet: A practical OWL-DL reasoner. Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web 5(2), 51-53 (2011)
25. Stevenson, G., Knox, S., Dobson, S., Nixon, P.: Ontonym: a collection of upper ontologies for developing pervasive systems. In: Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Context, Information and Ontologies, CIAO 2009, pp. 9:1-9:8. ACM, New York (2009)
26. Tappolet, J., Bernstein, A.: Applied Temporal RDF: Efficient Temporal Querying of RDF Data with SPARQL. In: Aroyo, L., et al. (eds.) ESWC 2009. LNCS, vol. 5554, pp. 308-322. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
27. Teymourian, K., Rohde, M., Paschke, A.: Fusion of background knowledge and streams of events. In: DEBS, pp. 302-313 (2012)
28. Wessel, M., Luther, M., Wagner, M.: The difference a day makes - recognizing important events in daily context logs. In: C&O:RR (2007)
29. Ye, J., Stevenson, G., Dobson, S.: A top-level ontology for smart environments. Pervasive and Mobile Computing 7(3), 359-378 (2011)