Comparisons of amine solvents for post-combustion CO2 capture: A multi-objective analysis approach

International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control

Volumn 18, Issue , 2013, Pages 68-74

  Lee, Anita S ^a,b   Eslick, John C ^a,b   Miller, David C ^a   Kitchin, John R ^a,b  

^a NATIONAL ENERGY TECHNOLOGY LABORATORY   (United States)

^b CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Amine solvent comparisons; Aspen modeling; Carbon capture; Multi objective optimization

Indexed keywords

CARBON CAPTURE; CARBON DIOXIDE; COAL; COAL COMBUSTION; COSTS; ELECTROLYTES; FOSSIL FUEL POWER PLANTS; GENETIC ALGORITHMS; INVESTMENTS; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; PROCESS DESIGN; SOLVENTS; SPECIFICATIONS;

2-AMINO-2-METHYL-1-PROPANOL; AMINE SOLVENTS; ASPEN MODELS; COAL-FIRED POWER PLANT; MULTI-OBJECTIVE ANALYSIS; MULTI-OBJECTIVE GENETIC ALGORITHM; PROCESS SPECIFICATION; THERMODYNAMIC MODEL;

ETHANOLAMINES;

CARBON DIOXIDE; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; COMBUSTION; GENETIC ALGORITHM; MODELING; OPTIMIZATION; SOLVENT;

POPULUS;

EID: 84880986072     PISSN: 17505836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2013.06.020     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. 2 capture from power plants part I. A parametric study of the technical performance based on monoethanolamine. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 2007, 1(April (1)):37-46.
2. 2 capture using MEA scrubbing: a flowsheet decomposition method. Energy Conversion and Management 2005, 46(3):475-487.
3. 2 capture with MEA: integrating the absorption process and steam cycle of an existing coal-fired power plant 2004, University of Waterloo, Canada, (PhD thesis).
4. Aspen Plus v7.2 2010, Aspen Technology Inc., Cambridge, MA.
5. 2 capture and emission reduction. Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 2010, 1(December (24)):3459-3464.
6. Carbon Capture Simulation Initiative AspenSinter User Manual 2012 November, National Energy Technology Laboratory.
7. 2 emissions from coal-fired power plants. Heat Recovery Systems and CHP 1995, 15(2):231-240.
8. 2 absorption stripping systems. Separation Science and Technology 2005, 40(March (4)):877-909.
9. 2 capture. Energy Procedia 2011, 4:201-208.
10. 2 capture by tertiary amine absorbents: a performance comparison study. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 2013, 52(June (24)):8323-8331.
11. Ciferno J., Litynski J., Plasynski S., Murphy J., Vaux G., Munson R., Marano J. DOE/NETL Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage RD&D Roadmap 2010, US DOE National Energy Technology Laboratory, Pittsburgh.
12. 2 absorption. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 2007, 1(April (2)):151-157.
13. 2 capture by aqueous amines and aqueous ammonia - a comparison. Energy Procedia 2009, 1(February (1)):949-954.
14. Davis J., Rochelle G. Thermal degradation of monoethanolamine at stripper conditions. Energy Procedia 2009, 1(February (1)):327-333.
15. 2 capture and compression process. Computers & Chemical Engineering 2011, 35(8):1488-1500.
16. 2 removal from flue gases using MEA 2002 May, The University of Texas Austin, USA, MS thesis.
17. 2 capture by aqueous monoethanolamine. AIChE Journal 2003, 49(July (7)):1676-1686.
18. 2 capture. Clean Air Task Force 2009, 1-39.
19. 2. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 2012, 51(42):13609-13618. 10.1021/ie301419q.
20. 2. ChemSusChem 2010, 3(July (8)):931-938.
21. modeFRONTIER v4.4.2, 2012. ESTECO, Trieste, Italy.
22. NETL, Nov. 2010. Cost and Performance Comparison Baseline for Fossil Energy Power Plants. Tech. Rep. DOE/2010/1397.
23. 2 capture process with aqueous amines using response surface methodology. Computers & Chemical Engineering Aug. 2011, 35(8):1521-1531.
24. 2 concentration in flue gas and utility cost fluctuations. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control Mar. 2013, 13:34-43.
25. 2 capture by wet chemical absorption: the misguided focus on low heat of absorption solvents. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 2010, 4(January (1)):36-43.
26. 2 capture by aqueous amines. AIChE Journal 2007, 53(12):3144-3154.
27. 2 capture by aqueous amines. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 2006, 45(April (8)):2457-2464.
28. Puxty G., Rowland R., Allport A., Yang Q., Bown M., Burns R., Maeder M., Attalla M. Carbon dioxide postcombustion capture: a novel screening study of the carbon dioxide absorption performance of 76 amines. Environmental Science & Technology 2009, 43(August (16)):6427-6433.
29. 2 Capture. Science 2009, 325(September (5948)):1652-1654.
30. 2 capture plant energy requirement by selecting a suitable solvent and analyzing the operating parameters. International Journal of Energy Research 2012, 37(February (8)):973-981.
31. Sartori G., Savage D. Sterically hindered amines for carbon dioxide removal from gases. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Fundamentals 1983, 22(2):239-249.
32. Seider W.D., Seader J.D., Lewin D.R., Widagdo S. Product and Process Design Principles. Synthesis, Analysis and Design. December 2008, Wiley, Westford, ISBN-10: 0470048956; ISBN-13: 978-0470048955.
33. 2 absorbents-I. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 2007, 1(April (1)):5-10.
34. 2 absorbents-II. Chemical Engineering Research and Design 2009, 87(February (2)):135-144.
35. 2 interaction investigated by NMR and IR spectroscopies. Chemistry Letters 2003, 32(4):344-345.