Where is the governance in Internet governance?

New Media and Society

Volumn 15, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 720-736

  van Eeten, Michel J G ^a   Mueller, Milton ^b  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^b SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cyberlaw; information security; Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN); Internet governance; network; state

Indexed keywords

EID: 84880975306     PISSN: 14614448     EISSN: 14617315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1461444812462850     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Anderson R,Moore T.The economics of information security.Science. 2006;314:610-613.
2. Networks and Netwars: The Future of Terror, Crime and Militancy. Arquilla JRonfelt D, ed. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation; 2001.
3. Axelrod RThe Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books; 2006.
4. Bauer JM.Internet governance: theory and first principles. Paper presented at the 33rd annual telecommunication policy research conference; 2005Arlington, VA; 2005.
5. Bauer JM,van Eeten M.Cybersecurity: stakeholder incentives, externalities, and policy options.Telecommunications Policy. 2009;33 (10-11): 706-719.
6. Benkler YThe Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 2006.
7. Bygrave L,Bing JInternet Governance: Infrastructure and Institutions. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009.
8. Christou G,Simpson S.New governance, the Internet, and country code top-level domains in Europe.Governance: An International Journal of Policy Administration and Institutions. 2009;22:599-624.
9. De Beer J,Clemmer CD.Global trends in online copyright enforcement: a non-neutral role for network intermediaries?.Jurimetrics. 2009;49:375-409.
10. Deibert R,Rohozinski R.Risking security: policies and paradoxes of cyberspace security.International Political Sociology. 2010;4 (1): 15-32.
11. Access Denied: The Practice and Policy of Global Internet Filtering. Deibert RPalfrey JGRohozinski R, ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2008.
12. DeNardis LProtocol Politics: The Globalization of Internet Governance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2009.
13. Reforming Internet Governance: Perspectives from the Working Group on Internet Governance. Drake WJ, ed. New York: United Nations ICT Task Force; 2005.
14. Drezner DW.The global governance of the Internet: bringing the state back in.Political Science Quarterly. 2004;119:447-498.
15. Drezner DWAll Politics Is Global: Explaining International Regulatory Regimes. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2007.
16. Froomkin AM.Wrong turn in cyberspace: using ICANN to route around the APA and the constitution.Duke Law Journal. 2000;50 (1): 17-186.
17. Froomkin AM.ICANN 2.0: meet the new boss.Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review. 2003;36 (3): 1087-1102.
18. Goldsmith J,Wu TWho Controls the Internet? Illusions of a Borderless World. New York: Oxford University Press; 2006.
19. Granovetter M.Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness.American Journal of Sociology. 1985;91 (3): 481-510.
20. Hofmann J.Internet governance: between state authority and private coordination.Internationale Politik Und Gesellschaft. 2005;3:10-29.
21. IGP (2005) Political oversight of ICANN: A briefing for the WSIS summit. Internet Governance Project. Paper IGP05-009. Available at: http://internetgovernance.org/pdf/political-oversight.pdf.
22. Johnson DR,Post D.Law and borders: the rise of law in cyberspace.Stanford Law Review. 1996;48:1367.
23. Johnson DR,Post DCoordinating the Internet. Kahin BKeller JH, ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1997:62-91.
24. Johnson DR,Crawford SP,Palfrey JG.The accountable Internet: peer production of Internet governance.Virginia Journal of Law and Technology. 2004;9:2-33.
25. Jones C,Hesterly WS,Borgatti SP.A general theory of network governance: exchange conditions and social mechanisms.Academy of Management Review. 1997;22 (4): 911-945.
26. Networked Politics: Agency, Structure and Power. Kahler M, ed. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press; 2009.
27. Kjaer AMGovernance. Cambridge: Polity Press; 2004.
28. Klein H.Understanding WSIS: an institutional analysis of the UN world summit on the information society.Information Technology & International Development. 2004;1 (3-4): 3-14.
29. Kleinwachter W.Beyond ICANN vs ITU? How WSIS tries to enter the new territory of Internet governance.Gazette. 2004a;66 (3-4): 233-251.
30. Kleinwachter W.WSIS: a new diplomacy? Multistakeholder approach and bottom up policy in global ICT governance.Information Technology & International Development. 2004b;1 (3-4): 3-13.
31. Koppell JGS.Pathologies of accountability: ICANN and the challenge of 'multiple accountabilities disorder'.Public Administration Review. 2005;65 (1): 94-108.
32. KrebsB (2009) A year later: a look back at McColo. In: Washington post security fix weblog. Available at: http://voices.washingtonpost.com/securityfix/2009/11/a_year_later_a_look_back_at_mc.html.
33. Kuerbis BSyracuse, NY: School Information Science and Technology; 2011.
34. Lessig LCode and Other Laws of Cyberspace. New York: Basic Books; 1999.
35. Litman JDigital Copyright. Amherst, NY: Prometheus; 2001.
36. McDowell S,Steinberg P,Tomasello TManaging the Infosphere: Governance, Technology, and Cultural Practice in Motion. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press; 2008.
37. Malcolm JMulti-Stakeholder Governance and the Internet Governance Forum. Perth, WA, Australia: Terminus Press; 2008.
38. Marsden CTNet Neutrality: Towards a Co-Regulatory Solution. New York: Bloomsbury USA; 2010.
39. Mathiason JInternet Governance: The New Frontier of Global Institutions. New York: Routledge Global Institutions series; 2009.
40. Moore T,Clayton R,Anderson R.The economics of online crime.Journal of Economic Perspectives. 2009;23 (3): 3-20.
41. Mueller MRuling the Root: Internet Governance and the Taming of Cyberspace. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2002.
42. Mueller MNetworks and States: The Global Politics of Internet Governance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2010.
43. Mueller M,Kuerbis B,Pagé C.Democratizing global communication? Global civil society and the campaign for communication rights in the information society.International Journal of Communication. 2007a;1:267-296.
44. Mueller M,Mathiason J,Klein H.The Internet and global governance: principles and norms for a new regime.Global Governance. 2007b;13 (2): 237-254.
45. O'Siochru S.Civil society participation in the WSIS process: promises and reality.Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies. 2004;18 (3): 330-344.
46. Owen BCommunication Research & Policy: A Sourcebook. Braman S, ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2002:347-356.
47. Palfrey JG.The end of the experiment: how ICANN'S foray into global Internet democracy failed.Harvard Journal of Law and Technology. 2004;17 (2): 409-473.
48. ParkYJ (2008) The political economy of ccTLDs. PhD Thesis, Syracuse University School of Information Studies, Syracuse, NY.
49. Pavane E,Diani M.Structuring online and offline discursive spaces of Internet governance: insights from a network approach to map an emerging field. Paper presented at the annual GigaNet symposium; 2008Hyderabad, India; 2008.
50. Pommerening C.The development of governance structures for the Internet: principles and practices in the case of the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN).Dissertation Abstracts International, A: The Humanities and Social Sciences. 2004;64 (10): 3831-A.
51. Powell WW.Neither market nor hierarchy: network forms of organization.Research in Organizational Behavior. 1990;12:295-336.
52. Raboy M.The WSIS as a political space in global media governance.Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies. 2004;18 (3): 347-361.
53. Samuelson P.The copyright grab.Wired. 4 (1): 134.
54. Solove DJThe Future of Reputation: Gossip, Rumor and Privacy on the Internet. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 2007.
55. Theories of Democratic Network Governance. Sørenson ETorfing J, ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2007.
56. Souter DWhose Summit? Whose Information Society? Developing Countries and Civil Society at the World Summit on the Information Society. Melville, South Africa: Association for Progressive Communications; 2007.
57. The Economist (2009) Regulating the Internet: ICANN be independent. Available at: http://www.economist.com/node/14517430.
58. Urban JM,Quilter L.Efficient process or 'Chilling effects'? Takedown notices under section 512 of the digital millennium copyright act.Santa Clara Computer and High Technology Law Journal. 2006;22:621-693.
59. van Eeten M,Bauer JMEconomics of malware: security decisions, incentives and externalities. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development; 2008 2008.
60. van Eeten M,Bauer JM,Asghari H, et alThe role of Internet service providers in botnet mitigation: an empirical analysis based on spam data. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development; 2010 2010.
61. Villeneuve N.Evasion tactics: global online censorship is growing, but so are the means to challenge it and protect privacy.Index on Censorship. 2007;4:71-85.
62. WGIG (2005) Report of the working group on Internet governance. June. Available at: http://www.wgig.org/docs/WGIGREPORT.pdf.
63. Wu T.Network neutrality, broadband discrimination.Journal of Telecommunications and High Technology Law. 2003;2:141.
64. Yoo CNet Neutrality or Net Neutering: Should Broadband Internet Services Be Regulated?. Lenard TNMay R, ed. Berlin: Springer; 2006:25-71.
65. ZimmerM (2008) The externalities of search 2.0: the emerging privacy threats when the drive for the perfect search engine meets Web 2.0. First Monday13(3). Available at: http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/viewArticle/2136.
66. Zittrain JThe Future of the Internet - And How to Stop It. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 2008.
67. ZittrainJEdelmanB (2003) Empirical analysis of Internet filtering in china. Available at: http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/filtering/china/ (25 February 2009).