Modelling policy decision of sustainable energy strategies for Nanjing city: A fuzzy integral approach

Renewable Energy

Volumn 62, Issue , 2014, Pages 197-203

  Zhang, Ling ^a   Zhou, De Qun ^a   Zhou, Peng ^a   Chen, Qi Ting ^a  

^a NANJING UNIVERSITY OF AERONAUTICS AND ASTRONAUTICS   (China)

Author keywords

fuzzy measure; China; Decision making; Fuzzy integral; Sustainable energy plan

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS; CHINA; ECONOMY AND SOCIETY; FUZZY INTEGRAL; FUZZY MEASURES; SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL; SUSTAINABLE ENERGY; SUSTAINABLE ENERGY SOURCES;

COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; ENERGY POLICY; FUZZY SYSTEMS; INTEGRAL EQUATIONS;

ENERGY CONSERVATION;

DECISION ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; FUZZY MATHEMATICS; IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS; NUMERICAL MODEL; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

CHINA; JIANGSU; NANJING [JIANGSU];

EID: 84880968614     PISSN: 09601481     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2013.06.044     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Shen Y.C., Lin G.T.R., Li K.P., Yuan B.J.C. An assessment of exploiting renewable energy sources with concerns of policy and technology. Energ Policy 2010, 38:4604-4616.
2. Tsoutsos T., Drandaki M., Frantzeskaki N., Iosifidis E., Kiosses I. Sustainable energy planning by using multi-criteria analysis application in the island of Crete. Energ Policy 2009, 37:1587-1600.
3. Wang J.J., Jing Y.Y., Zhang C.F., Zhao J.H. Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decision-making. Renew Sust Energ Rev 2009, 13:2263-2278.
4. Madlener R., Kowalski K., Stagl S. New ways for the integrated appraisal of national energy scenarios: the case of renewable energy use in Austria. Energ Policy 2007, 35:6060-6074.
5. Kaya T., Kahraman C. Multicriteria renewable energy planning using an integrated fuzzy VIKOR & AHP methodology: the case of Istanbul. Energy 2010, 35:2517-2527.
6. Heo E., Kim J., Boo K.J. Analysis of the assessment factors for renewable energy dissemination program evaluation using fuzzy AHP. Renew Sust Energ Rev 2010, 14:2214-2220.
7. Kahraman C., Kaya I., Cebi S. Acomparative analysis for multiattribute selection among renewable energy alternatives using fuzzy axiomatic design and fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. Energy 2009, 34:1603-1616.
8. San Cristóbal J.R. Multi-criteria decision-making in the selection of a renewable energy project in Spain: the Vikor method. Renew Energ 2011, 36:498-502.
9. Karakosta C., Askounis D. Developing countries' energy needs and priorities under a sustainable development perspective: a linguistic decision support approach. Energ Sust Dev 2010, 14:330-338.
10. Doukas H., Karakosta C., Psarras J. Computing with words to assess the sustainability of renewable energy options. Expert Syst Appl 2010, 37:5491-5497.
11. Grabisch M. The application of fuzzy integrals in multicriteria decision making. Eur J Oper Res 1996, 89:445-456.
12. Narukawa Y., Torra V. Multidimensional generalized fuzzy integral. Fuzzy Set Syst 2009, 160:802-815.
13. Srivastava S., Singh M., Madasu V.K., Hanmandlu M. Choquet fuzzy integral based modeling of nonlinear system. Appl Soft Comput 2008, 8:839-848.
14. Stupňanová A. Special fuzzy measures on infinite countable sets and related aggregation functions. Fuzzy Set Syst 2011, 167:57-64.
15. Agahi H., Yaghoobi M.A. General hardy type inequality for seminormed fuzzy integrals. Appl Math Comput 2010, 216:1972-1977.
16. Maiga A.S., Chen G.M., Wang Q., Xu J.Y. Renewable energy options for a Sahel country: Mali. Renew Sust Energ Rev 2008, 12:564-574.
17. Hu Y.C. Fuzzy integral-based perceptron for two-class pattern classification problems. Inform Sci 2007, 177:1673-1686.
18. Verkeyn A., Botteldooren D., Baets B.D. Genetic learning of fuzzy integrals accumulating human-reported environmental stress. Appl Soft Comput 2011, 11:305-314.
19. Demirel T., Demirel N.Ç., Kahraman C. Multi-criteria warehouse location selection using Choquet integral. Expert Syst Appl 2010, 37:3943-3952.
20. Büyüközkan G., Ruan D. Choquet integral based aggregation approach to software development risk assessment. Inform Sci 2010, 180:441-451.
21. Kojadinovic I., Marichal J.L., Roubens M. An axiomatic approach to the definition of the entropy of a discrete Choquet capacity. Inform Sci 2005, 172:131-153.
22. Shieh J.I., Wu H.H., Liu H.C. Applying a complexity-based Choquet integral to evaluate students' performance. Expert Syst Appl 2009, 36:5100-5106.
23. Beér J.M. High efficiency electric power generation: the environmental role. Prog Energ Combust 2007, 33:107-134.
24. Chatzimouratidis A.I., Pilavachi P.A. Multicriteria evaluation of power plants impact on the living standard using the analytic hierarchy process. Energ Policy 2008, 36:1074-1089.
25. Marichal J.L. Entropy of discrete Choquet capacities. Eur J Oper Res 2002, 137:612-624.
26. Liu Q, Zhang JZ, Zhang SF. Conditions of renewable energy resources of Nanjing city. In: Proceedings of the 2011 Jiangsu conference on HVACR, Yanch, China. p. 379-85 [in Chinese].
27. The project group for study on sustainable energy development plans for China The books on sustainable energy development plans for China: synthesis volume 2008, China Electricity Publishing Company, Beijing, [in Chinese].
28. Patlitzianas K.D., Psarras J. Formulating a modern energy companies' environment in the EU accession member states through a decision support methodology. Energ Policy 2007, 35:2231-2238.
29. Grabisch M. Fuzzy integral in multicriteria decision making. Fuzzy Set Syst 1995, 69:279-298.