Critical discourse analysis and critical policy studies

Critical Policy Studies

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 177-197

  Fairclough, Norman ^a  

^a LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

argumentation; critical discourse analysis; cultural political economy; discourse; policy; poststructuralist discourse analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 84880957999     PISSN: 19460171     EISSN: 1946018X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/19460171.2013.798239     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Bacchi, C., 2012. Why study problematizations? Making politics visible. Open journal of political science, 2 (1), 1-8. Doi:10.4236/ojps.2012.21001. http://www.SciRP.org/journal/ojps (http://www.SciRP.org/journal/ojps)
2. Chouliaraki, L. and Fairclough, N. 1999. Discourse in late modernity, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
3. Fairclough, I. and Fairclough, N. 2011. Practical reasoning in political discourse: the UK government's response to the economic crisis in the 2008 Pre-Budget Report. Discourse and society, 22 (3): 243-268.
4. Fairclough, I. and Fairclough, N. 2012a. Political discourse analysis: a method for advanced students, London: Routledge.
5. Fairclough, I. and Fairclough, N. 2012b. " Analyse et évaluation de l'argumentation dans l'analyse critique du discours (CDA): délibération et dialectique des Lumières ". In Argumentation et analyse du discours (9 electronic journal of the ADARR Group)4-26.
6. Fairclough, N. 1992. Discourse and social change, Cambridge: Polity Press.
7. Fairclough, N. 2001. The dialectics of discourse. Textus, 14 (2): 231-242.
8. Fairclough, N. 2003. Analysing discourse: textual analysis for social research, London: Routledge.
9. Fairclough, N. 2006. Language and globalization, London: Routledge.
10. Fairclough, N. 2009. A dialectical-relational approach to critical discourse analysis in social research Methods in critical discourse analysis, Edited by: M. Meyer and R. Wodak. 211-236. London: Sage.
11. Fairclough, N. and Graham, P. 2002. Marx as critical discourse analyst: the genesis of a critical method and its relevance to the critique of global capital. Estudios de Sociolinguistica, 3 (1): 185-229.
12. Fairclough, N., Jessop, R. and Sayer, A. 2004. " Critical realism and semiosis ". In Realism, discourse and deconstruction, Edited by: Roberts, J.M. and Joseph, J. 23-42. London: Routledge.
13. Fischer, F. 2003. Reframing public policy: discursive politics and deliberative practices, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14. Fischer, F. 2007. " Deliberative policy analysis as practical reason: integrating empirical and normative arguments ". In Handbook of public policy analysis, Edited by: Fischer, F., Miller, G.J. and Sidney, M.S. 223-236. London and New York: CRC Press.
15. Fischer, F. and Forester, J. 1993. The argumentative turn in policy analysis, Durham: Duke University Press.
16. Fischer, F. and Gottweis, H. 2012. The argumentative turn revisited: public policy as communicative practice, Durham, London: Duke University Press.
17. Foucault, M. 1984. " Polemics, politics and problematizations: an interview with Michel Foucault ". In The Foucault reader, Edited by: Rabinow, P. 381-390. London: Penguin Books.
18. Gottweis, H. 2003. " Theoretical strategies of poststructuralist policy analysis: towards an analytics of government ". In Deliberative policy analysis: understanding governance in the network society, Edited by: Hajer, M. and Wagenaar, H. 247-265. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19. Harvey, D. 1996. Justice, nature and the geography of difference, Oxford: Blackwell.
20. Harvey, D. 2010. The enigma of capital and the crises of capitalism, London: Profile Books.
21. Howarth, D. 2009. Power, discourse, and policy: articulating a hegemony approach to critical policy studies. Critical policy studies, 3 (3-4): 309-335.
22. Howarth, D. and Griggs, S. 2012. " Poststructuralist policy analysis: discourse, hegemony and critical explanation ". In The argumentative turn revisited: public policy as communicative practice, Edited by: Fischer, F. and Gottweis, H. 305-342. Durham, London: Duke University Press.
23. Jessop, B. 2004. Critical semiotic analysis and cultural political economy. Critical discourse studies, 1 (2): 159-174.
24. Jessop, B. 2009. Cultural political economy and critical policy studies. Critical policy studies, 3 (3-4): 336-356.
25. Jessop, B. and Sum, N.-L. 2001. Pre-disciplinary and post-disciplinary perspectives in political economy. New political economy, 6: 89-101.
26. Krugman, P. 1994. Competitiveness: a dangerous obsession. Foreign affairs, 73 (2): 28-44.
27. Krugman, P. 2011. The competition myth. New York Times, 23 January.,
28. Marsden, R. 1999. The nature of capital: Marx after Foucault, London: Routledge.
29. Morera, E. 1990. Gramsci's historicism: a realist interpretation, London: Routledge.
30. Sayer, A. 2000. Realism and social science, London: Sage.
31. Sayer, A. 2011. Why things matter to people: social science, values and ethical life, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32. Sum, N.-L., 2004. Towards a cultural political economy: discourses, material power and (counter-)hegemony. EU Framework 6 Demologos spot paper http://demologos.ncl.ac.uk/wp/wp1/disc.php (http://demologos.ncl.ac.uk/wp/wp1/disc.php)
33. Sum, N.-L. 2009. The production of hegemonic policy discourses: 'competitiveness' as a knowledge brand and its (re)contextualizations. Critical policy studies, 3 (2): 184-203.