MULTI-CRITERIA GROUP DECISION MAKING WITH HETEROGENEOUS INFORMATION BASED ON IDEAL POINTS CONCEPT

International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems

Volumn 6, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 616-625

  Peng, Ding Hong ^a,b   Gao, Chang Yuan ^a   Zhai, Li Li ^a  

^a HARBIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^b KUNMING UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

decision attitude; heterogeneous information; ideal points; information uniform; multi criteria group decision making (MCGDM); ordered weighted distance (OWD) measure

Indexed keywords

DECISION ATTITUDES; HETEROGENEOUS INFORMATION; IDEAL POINTS; INFORMATION UNIFORM; MULTI-CRITERIA GROUP DECISION MAKINGS; WEIGHTED DISTANCE;

FUZZY SETS; LINGUISTICS; NUMERICAL METHODS; SEMANTICS;

DECISION MAKING;

EID: 84880953419     PISSN: 18756891     EISSN: 18756883     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/18756891.2013.802112     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Hwang, C.L. and Yoon, K. 1981. Multiple Attribute Decision Making, Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
2. Shih, H.-S., Shyur, H.-J. and Lee, E. S. 2007. An extension of TOPSIS for group decision making. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 45: 801 - 813.
3. Chen, C.-T. 2000. Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 114: 1 - 9.
4. Jahanshahloo, G.R., Lotfi, F.H. and Izadikhah, M. 2006. An algorithmic method to extend TOPSIS for decision-making problems with interval data. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 175: 1375 - 1384.
5. Wang, Y.-M. and Elhag, T.M.S. 2006. Fuzzy TOPSIS method based on alpha level sets with an application to bridge risk assessment. Expert Systems with Applications, 31: 309 - 319.
6. Wang, Y.-J. and Lee, H.-S. 2007. Generalizing TOPSIS for fuzzy multiple-criteria group decision-making. Computers and Mathematics with Applications, 53: 1762 - 1772.
7. Chen, M.-F. and Tzeng, G.-H. 2004. Combining grey relation and TOPSIS concepts for selecting an expatriate host country. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 40: 1473 - 1490.
8. García-Cascales, M.S. and Lamata, M.T. 2007. Solving a decision problem with linguistic information. Pattern Recognition Letters, 28: 2284 - 2294.
9. Chen, S.-M. and Lee, L.-W. 2010. Fuzzy multiple attributes group decision-making based on the interval type-2 TOPSIS method. Expert Systems with Applications, 37: 2790 - 2798.
10. Li, D.-F. 2010. TOPSIS based nonlinear programming methodology for MADM with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 18 (2): 299 - 311.
11. Hu, Y.-C. 2008. Classification performance evaluation of single-layer perceptron with Choquet integral-based TOPSIS. Appl. Intell., 29: 204 - 215.
12. Zanakis, S.H., Solomon, A., Wishart, N. and Dublish, S. 1998. Multi-attribute decision making: A simulation comparison of selection methods. European Journal of Operational Research, 107: 507 - 529.
13. Zadeh, L.A. 1975. The concept of a linguistic variable and its applications to approximate reasoning. Part I. Information Sciences, 8: 199 - 249.
14. Herrera, F. and Herrera-Viedma, E. 2000. Linguistic decision analysis: steps for solving decision problems under linguistic information. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 115: 67 - 82.
15. Xu, Z. 2004. A method based on linguistic aggregation operators for group decision making with linguistic preference relations. Information Sciences, 166: 19 - 30.
16. Xu, Z. 2007. A method for multiple attribute decision making with incomplete weight information in linguistic setting. Knowledge-Based Systems, 20: 719 - 725.
17. Herrera, F., Herrera-Viedma, E. and Martinez, L. 2000. A fusion approach for managing multi-granularity linguistic term sets in decision making. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 114: 43 - 58.
18. Herrera, F., Martinez, L. and Sanchez, P.J. 2005. Managing non-homogeneous information in group decision making. European Journal of Operational Research, 166: 115 - 132.
19. Martinez, L., Liu, J., Ruan, D. and Yang, J.-B. 2007. Dealing with heterogeneous information in engineering evaluation processes. Information Sciences, 177: 1533 - 1542.
20. Yager, R.R. 1988. On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decision-making. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 18 (1): 183 - 190.
21. Yager, R.R. 1996. Quantifier guided aggregation using OWA operators. International Journal Intelligent System, 11 (1): 49 - 73.
22. Xu, Z. 2005. An overview of methods for determining OWA weights. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 20: 843 - 865.
23. Malczewski, J. 2006. Ordered weighted averaging with fuzzy quantifiers: GIS-based multicriteria evaluation for land-use suitability analysis. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 8: 270 - 277.
24. Deng, H., Yeh, C.-H. and Willis, R.J. 2000. Inter-company comparison using modified TOPSIS with objective weights. Computers & Operations Research, 27: 963 - 973.