Changing the focus in acute respiratory distress syndrome: Treating is mandatory, but preventing is imperative

Critical Care Medicine

Volumn 41, Issue 8, 2013, Pages 2058-2059

  Barbas, Carmen Silvia Valente ^a,b   Neto, Ary Serpa ^c,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^b HOSPITAL ISRAELITA ALBERT EINSTEIN   (Brazil)

^c Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein   (United States)

^d FACULDADE DE MEDICINA DO ABC   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Acute respiratory distress syndrome; Lung injury; Mechanical ventilation; Prevention; Tidal volume

Indexed keywords

ADULT RESPIRATORY DISTRESS SYNDROME; EDITORIAL; HUMAN; INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; LUNG INJURY; LUNG VENTILATION; POSITIVE END EXPIRATORY PRESSURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); TIDAL VOLUME;

ANIMALS; MALE; POSITIVE-PRESSURE RESPIRATION; PULMONARY ARTERY; TIDAL VOLUME; VENTILATOR-INDUCED LUNG INJURY;

EID: 84880949764     PISSN: 00903493     EISSN: 15300293     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31828c25f2     Document Type: Editorial

References (15)

1. ARDS Definition Task Force, Ranieri MV, Rubenfeld GD, et al: Acute respiratory distress syndrome: The Berlin Definition. JAMA 2012; 307:2526-2533
2. Herridge MS, Tansey CM, Matté A, et al; Canadian Critical Care Trials Group: Functional disability 5 years after acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 2011; 364:1293-1304
3. Amato MB, Barbas CS, Medeiros DM, et al: Effect of a protectiveventilation strategy on mortality in the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 1998; 338:347-354
4. The Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network: Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 2000; 342:1301-1308
5. Barbas CS, Matos GF, Amato MB, et al: Goal-oriented respiratory management for critically ill patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care Res Pract 2012; 2012:952168
6. Villar J, Blanco J, Añón JM, et al; ALIEN Network: The ALIEN study: Incidence and outcome of acute respiratory distress syndrome in the era of lung protective ventilation. Intensive Care Med 2011; 37:1932-1941
7. de Matos GF, Stanzani F, Passos RH, et al: How large is the lung recruitability in early acute respiratory distress syndrome: A prospective case series of patients monitored by computed tomography. Crit Care 2012; 16:R4
8. Plötz FB, Slutsky AS, van Vught AJ, et al: Ventilator-induced lung injury and multiple system organ failure: A critical review of facts and hypotheses. Intensive Care Med 2004; 30:1865-1872
9. Hubmayr RD: Point: Is low tidal volume mechanical ventilation preferred for all patients on ventilation? Yes. Chest 2011; 140:9-11
10. Serpa Neto A, Cardoso SO, Manetta JA, et al: Association between use of lung-protective ventilation with lower tidal volumes and clinical outcomes among patients without acute respiratory distress syndrome: A meta-analysis. JAMA 2012; 308:1651-1659
11. Determann RM, Royakkers A, Wolthuis EK, et al: Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with conventional tidal volumes for patients without acute lung injury: A preventive randomized controlled trial. Crit Care 2010; 14:R1
12. Lipes J, Bojmehrani A, Lellouche F: Low tidal volume ventilation in patients without acute respiratory distress syndrome: A paradigm shift in mechanical ventilation. Crit Care Res Pract 2012; 2012: 416862
13. Menendez C, Martinez-Caro L, Moreno L, et al: Pulmonary Vascular Dysfunction Induced by High Tidal Volume Mechanical Ventilation. Crit Care Med 2013; 41:e149-e155
14. Gattinoni L: Counterpoint: Is low tidal volume mechanical ventilation preferred for all patients on ventilation? No. Chest 2011; 140:11-13
15. Tenney SM, Remmers JE: Comparative quantitative morphology of the mammalian lung: Diffusing area. Nature 1963; 197:54-56